Post Number: 51
Posted From: 188.8.131.52
|Posted on Tuesday, June 06, 2006 - 08:42 pm: ||
Saw this yeast on White Labs site the last time I was there and wrote it down as something to try. I'm thinking of using it in an APA. Has anyone had any experience with it? This is what it says about it on the site: From Northern California. This strain is more fruity than WLP001, and slightly more flocculant. Attenuation is lower, resulting in a fuller bodied beer than with WLP001.
Post Number: 489
Posted From: 184.108.40.206
|Posted on Tuesday, June 06, 2006 - 08:52 pm: ||
I have used it for a stout. I liked it, but I never used it again. Not sure why.
Post Number: 1120
Posted From: 220.127.116.11
|Posted on Tuesday, June 06, 2006 - 09:22 pm: ||
It gives a really nice apricot/peach like fruitiness to an APA especially when backed up by lots of Simcoe & Amarillo hops! I like using it for West Coast-style Browns, Porters & Stouts and use it exclusively in my RIS recipe. I think DC is a fan of it as well? Give it a try!
"From man's sweat and God's love, beer came into the world." ~ Saint Arnold of Metz (580-640) - Patron Saint of Brewers
Post Number: 5568
Posted From: 18.104.22.168
|Posted on Tuesday, June 06, 2006 - 09:43 pm: ||
It's supposed to be similar to Wyeast 1272, which is one of my favorite strains.
Post Number: 566
Posted From: 22.214.171.124
|Posted on Tuesday, June 06, 2006 - 11:50 pm: ||
Big thumbs up. What Beertracker and Bill said.
Post Number: 1625
Posted From: 126.96.36.199
|Posted on Wednesday, June 07, 2006 - 12:27 am: ||
I used it . Once in the "Old Fart" cream ale recipe.
seems like I used it once before... Would be nice if you could sort promash recipe and session files by yeast or grain types????????
Post Number: 44
Posted From: 188.8.131.52
|Posted on Wednesday, June 07, 2006 - 01:17 am: ||
I've used it side by side with WLP001. It finished a little faster and a little lower, and resulted in a slighly fruity finish vs clean WLP001. I liked it.
Post Number: 54
Posted From: 184.108.40.206
|Posted on Wednesday, June 07, 2006 - 02:39 am: ||
I've always found that this yeast finishes a little higher than wlp001, due to higher flocculation/lower attenuation.
I haven't used another yeast in my american IPA's since I used this one.
Post Number: 578
Posted From: 220.127.116.11
|Posted on Wednesday, June 07, 2006 - 01:50 pm: ||
I have not used it but use 1272 alot. If it is the same as 1272 it does a fantastic APA in combination with Cascades and similar citrusy hops.
Post Number: 2317
Posted From: 18.104.22.168
|Posted on Wednesday, June 07, 2006 - 02:41 pm: ||
I've used it in Denny's RIPA as my LBBS doesn't carry Wyeast and I don't have time to fool with stepping up any CL-50. I agree with the others comments on the more fruity and less attentive than the Chico yeast.