Post Number: 16
Posted From: 126.96.36.199
|Posted on Tuesday, October 02, 2007 - 04:41 pm: ||
I'm going to pick up a few bags of malt but my supplier doesn't have any Weyermann Munich malt (which I usually use).
However, he does have a bag of Dingemans Munich. Anyone out there with a lot of experience have any thoughts on wether or not I should make this substitute.
I'll be using the munich this fall/winter mainly in german style lagers.
Post Number: 2905
Posted From: 188.8.131.52
|Posted on Tuesday, October 02, 2007 - 09:40 pm: ||
I've subbed Dinglemans Pils for Weyermanns with good results. Never have tried their Munich though. My gut is that since it's also continental vs. American or UK it would be fine.
Post Number: 5078
Posted From: 184.108.40.206
|Posted on Wednesday, October 03, 2007 - 04:01 pm: ||
I've never used Dingemann Munich, but back in the day, DeWolf Cosyns Munich (another Belgian) was my all-time favorite munich malt, so I say go for it.
Post Number: 1013
Posted From: 220.127.116.11
|Posted on Thursday, October 04, 2007 - 02:37 am: ||
I used Dingeman's Munich in an alt, but it also had Durst Munich in it. The beer was good, but it was also the only altbier I ever brewed. I would say get it.