| Author |
Message |
    
David Spaedt
New Member
Username: Crockett
Post Number: 16
Registered: 06-2007
Posted From: 205.160.53.142
| | Posted on Tuesday, October 02, 2007 - 04:41 pm: | 
|
I'm going to pick up a few bags of malt but my supplier doesn't have any Weyermann Munich malt (which I usually use).
However, he does have a bag of Dingemans Munich. Anyone out there with a lot of experience have any thoughts on wether or not I should make this substitute.
I'll be using the munich this fall/winter mainly in german style lagers. |
Vance Barnes
Senior Member
Username: Vancebarnes
Post Number: 2905
Registered: 03-2003
Posted From: 209.155.236.154
| | Posted on Tuesday, October 02, 2007 - 09:40 pm: |
|
I've subbed Dinglemans Pils for Weyermanns with good results. Never have tried their Munich though. My gut is that since it's also continental vs. American or UK it would be fine. |
Chumley
Senior Member
Username: Chumley
Post Number: 5078
Registered: 02-2003
Posted From: 63.118.227.254
| | Posted on Wednesday, October 03, 2007 - 04:01 pm: |
|
I've never used Dingemann Munich, but back in the day, DeWolf Cosyns Munich (another Belgian) was my all-time favorite munich malt, so I say go for it. |
Dave Witt
Senior Member
Username: Davew
Post Number: 1013
Registered: 03-2003
Posted From: 71.194.189.126
| | Posted on Thursday, October 04, 2007 - 02:37 am: |
|
I used Dingeman's Munich in an alt, but it also had Durst Munich in it. The beer was good, but it was also the only altbier I ever brewed. I would say get it. |
Brews and Views Archive 2007 
Closed: New threads not accepted on this page