HOMEBREW Digest #1181 Wed 14 July 1993

Digest #1180 Digest #1182


	FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
		Rob Gardner, Digest Coordinator


Contents:
  fruit/hot break (korz)
  FWD: Low SG problem resolved! ("Bret D. Wortman")
  U-brew-it-here-place (MRS BETTINA A BARBIER)
  Flat Beer (MRS BETTINA A BARBIER)
   (MRS BETTINA A BARBIER)
  dark wheat (LLAPV)
  Pike Place Yeast (Domenick Venezia)
  Re: J Klaassen's wheat beer (LeRoy S. Strohl)
  electric surface heating elements (Joel Birkeland)
  Re:Pike Place Yeast (Martin Wilde)
  Bizarre homebrewer behavior (Yeah, yeah, yeah)
  Extract darkening with boil (Derrick Pohl)
  Hot Mash!!! (Charles T Jacob)
  Not enough body/SF area brewpubs (WHEATON_JOHN/HPBOI1_03)
  Re Brewpubs in Providence (Edward Croft)
  Fruit quantities in beer (Edward Croft)
  Beer in the White House (scott.powell)
  re-using yeast slurry (Jami Chism)
  Re: Seriously Stupid Advice (Bill Szymczak)
  Re: NO2 is NOT used in Guinness! (Daniel Roman)
  NOTE 07/13/93 08:27:54 ("Tom Stolfi")
  Parking in Portland (Jim Griggers)
  RE: Shake, Shake, Shake (lyons)
  RE: Pressure/temperature relationship (lyons)
  Irish Moss ("Anton Verhulst")
  Invert sugar (DAMON_NOEL/HP0800_01)
  Duvel (fjdobner)
  Re: 6oz bottles (Jeff Benjamin)
  Irish Moss (Gordon Baldwin)
  Good news for micros in New York State (bickham)
  Gas (urp!) (Jeff Frane)
  Irish moss/hot break? ("Daniel F McConnell")
  RE:Homebrew Digest #1180 (July 13, 1993) (John Mare)
  Publist at sierra (Andrius Tamulis)
  Irish Moss (Chuck Coronella)
  Nitrogen (Jack Schmidling)

Send articles for __publication_only__ to homebrew at hpfcmi.fc.hp.com (Articles are published in the order they are received.) Send UNSUBSCRIBE and all other requests, ie, address change, etc., to homebrew-request@ hpfcmi.fc.hp.com, BUT PLEASE NOTE that if you subscribed via the BITNET listserver (BEER-L at UA1VM.UA.EDU), then you MUST unsubscribe the same way! If your account is being deleted, please be courteous and unsubscribe first. Archives are available via anonymous ftp from sierra.stanford.edu. (Those without ftp access may retrieve files via mail from listserv at sierra.stanford.edu. Send HELP as the body of a message to that address to receive listserver instructions.) Please don't send me requests for back issues - you will be silently ignored. For "Cat's Meow" information, send mail to lutzen at novell.physics.umr.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Mon, 12 Jul 93 17:30 CDT From: korz at iepubj.att.com Subject: fruit/hot break Andy writes: > 1. Is 2 lb raspberries/gallon of beer a reasonable amount? It may be too intense. I used 5 lbs of raspberries and 5 lbs of cherries in a 5 gallon fermenter and then added about 3.5 gallons of beer on top of them. One judges comment (from our very own Roger Deschner) was that the beer didn't have enough "beer flavor" and that the fruit completely overpowered the malt. By the way, I presumed that some of the fruit flavor would subside after a while and the same beer entered in a competition two months later took first in fruit beers. Note that raspberries have a much more dominant flavor/aroma than cherries and this is why I'm speculating that 2#/gal would be too intense. If I were to try a balanced raspberry/ cherry beer, I would probably use 2:1 for the cherry/raspberry ratio. > 2. Should I use a Campden tablet overnight in the > raspberries to prevent introducing any new bacteria in the > secondary fermenter? Can`t help you there -- I froze and blanched my fruit for sanitation, but you are correct in assuming that you'll introduce some microbeasties with the fruit and you need to deal with them somehow. I just don't have any expericence with Campden tablets. > > 3. Siphoning: If I siphon first into one carboy and then > into the second, I'm afraid I may end up with differing > beers. I would think the first carboy would get the lighter > beer and the second a heavier beer (and more trub remnants). > I was thinking of a "Y" siphoning connector. The beer > being siphoned would hit the "Y" connector and then branch > out down two paths into the two carboys. I would end up > using 3 lengths of 3/8 " tubing along with the "Y" connector > to accomplish the siphon. > Does anyone know if this would work, or is it doomed to > abject failure? > If it would work, does anyone know where I could > procure a "Y" connector? The "Y" would work and you can probably get it from a place that stocks parts for Recreational Vehicles. Note that a problem with your experiment that you haven't mentioned is that the geometries of your fermenters will be different, no? You have to account for the space taken up by the fruit. *********************** Bill writes: >1) from the FAQ file, what and when is hot break? Hot break is coagulated protein. It is basically cooked protein, but is formed partly due to the proteins in the wort reacting with tannins from the grains and (later, for those who do wait for the hot break) hops. >2) do you wait for hot break before adding bittering hops (the >hops usually added at the beginning of the boil). Or are we >talking aromatic hop addition here? Personally, I do wait, even for the boiling hops. ******************************* Dave writes: >I've just recently started lagering, and I found it impossible to find >a Hunter Airstat anywhere in the Milwaukee, Wisconsin area. Everyone I talk >to at home supply type stores (Menards, etc) give me that look of "Yeah, right, >temperature controller...uh huh....sure....that's OK" You know, that look. You might try asking for a thermostat for a window airconditioner. I have the Hunter sales brochure and they make something like eight thermostats. One of them is most definately the Hunter Airstat. If your retailer carries Hunter thermostats, they should be able to get the Airstat. You could also call the number Jack posted -- sometimes I think homebrew makes you psychic. Al. Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1993 13:17:25 CDT From: "Bret D. Wortman" <wortman at centurylub.com> Subject: FWD: Low SG problem resolved! Well, I received a *lot* of replies to my question about low OG. It turns out that I hadn't mixed the wort well enough with the additional water I added to bring my volume to 5 gals. I started another batch this weekend, agitated well (you should've seen me, I didn't have a cap for the carboy so I hugged it to my chest, rested it on my thighs, and danced around the kitchen for a while--it was a sight!), and lo and behold, the OG came out 1.042 -- it was supposed to fall between 1.040 and 1.044, so I'll consider that a good measurement. Thanks again to all who commented and gave me guidance. Have one on me. ;-) WortMan +------------------------+------------------------------------------------ | Bret D. Wortman | "I want to lie shipwrecked and comatose, | wortman at centurylub.com | Drinking fresh mango juice. | wortman at decus.org | Goldfish shoals nibbling at my toes, | NLC Events Team Chair | Fun, fun, fun in the sun, sun, sun." +------------------------+------------------------------------------------ Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1993 19:05:07 EDT From: CKXB66B at prodigy.com (MRS BETTINA A BARBIER) Subject: U-brew-it-here-place On Thu, 8 Jul 93 10:16:59 PDT, Geoff (ghultin at sfu.ca) said in the course of a discussion that was really about: Subject: yeast FAQ/filters/temps: ->I just made some quasi-czech pilsner at a U-Brew-It-Here place Geoff, This is the first I have ever heard about a place of this nature. My husband and I are about to move, and it now occurs to me that this might be a good little sideline to get into in our new location. How do they get around the laws concerning selling homebrew, the gallons per year rules, and all the other regulations that exist to prevent us from all realizing our dreams and opening brew pubs in our basements? What state are they in, and if possible, could you tell me the name of the store and their address? Do they let the batch ferment there, bottle or keg it and baby-sit it for you? Take gravity readings, etc.? Is your batch guaranteed, or if there is an infection or the batch tastes like something awful, do you eat the cost of the brew?And do they have a standard selection of brews you can do, or do they let you use your imagination? There are plenty of homebrew supply shops where we are going, but this idea could really be a winner! Bettina B, dreaming in CT...about doing something like this in NY Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1993 19:05:22 EDT From: CKXB66B at prodigy.com (MRS BETTINA A BARBIER) Subject: Flat Beer On Thu, 8 Jul 93, Rich Ryan <ryancr at install4.swin.oasis.gtegsc.com> said about: Subject: flat beer: >The beer tastes fine other than being somewhat flat. Papazian's >troubleshooting section came to two conclusions: 1) I left an excessive >amount of sterilant in the bottles or 2) I'm storing the beer at >excessively cool temperatures. I used B-brite to sanitize the bottles >and equipment and was very diligent to make sure I washed it all off. As >far as storing the beer goes, it hasn't gone below 70 since it was bottled. Rich, how did you prime the beer at bottling time? If you rinsed the bottles well and are keeping them at 70 degrees, either you didn't prime the beer right or you have a brew that attained so high a level of alcohol that it killed all your yeast-critters. Why don't you give us a little more info...Style brewed, ingredients, OG, FG, type of yeast used and how long the fermentation took. >I noticed that I have more like two inches of air space in each bottle. I would think that with over 2 incles of headspace you would have little beer bombs ready to explode. I usually go for less air space rather than more, based on no real theory but just on our own good results and the hope that by elimiinating one little 1/2 inch of space in each bottle we might reduce the amount of bottles to fill and cap (and wash) per batch. I think that if this situation continues, you may want to re-bottle the beer, perhaps by making up a rather large starter, uncapping all the bottles, putting the beer into a well-sanitized bucket, adding the starter at high krauzen and re-bottling in a new batch of (already waiting) sanitized bottles. I would not use the same bottles again. Do you have a jet washer?. Or you could keg it and force-carbonate it. Good luck with it...Bettina Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1993 19:05:36 EDT From: CKXB66B at prodigy.com (MRS BETTINA A BARBIER) Subject: On Thu, 8 Jul 93 13:18 CDT, Frank (fjdobner at ihlpb.att.com) quoted Drew in: Subject: AdvertisingWyeast >>Again Drew says: >> How about this: Once a month, each person who sells a product may >>post a "I sell this product" message. No claims, no hype, no prices, >>no details, just a clear statement of intent to sell. Interested >>parties may then send them private email requesting info on their >>product. These people should then refrain from taking part in >>discussions on their or competing products. People with personal or >>financial interest (close friends of sellers, etc) should show similar >>restraint. Recomendations from satisfied customers in responses to >>queries from other list members would always be welcome. Frank then says:>I agree wholeheartedly with this recommendation. >This would perform many>services to us in this forum. >It would allow the commercialists (me being one) >to do their thing in a confined marketplace, would restrict commercial >behaviour to what would be strictly proper and improper, provide product >information to customers, and allow the real artists and scientists >here their needed airtime to talk about their hobby/pastime/professions. Bettina chimes in with her non-commercial 2 cents: I agree, as a newcomer here but a regular on another service (am I allowed to mention other services I am on?) that the problem of crass commercialism would be well addressed by this approach. I have no problem with people who sell things saying so...who knows, I might just want to buy one! I think the caveat should be that the description should fit into a proscribed amount of space, with details limited to descriptions of technology used or actual physical characteristics rather than long laudatory sales pitches about the item, i.e. "Fresh Belgian Yeast straight from a Trappist brewery and flown in every week on the Concorde, in special containers of x composition and gathered using y methods, including a hermetically sealed container of air from near the roof tiles of the brewery" might be acceptable...but not GUARANTEED TO MAKE TRAPPIST ALES BETTER THAN THE MONKS DO!!!!!....I am always interested in reading about new things, and especially in how things work or how they are done, but NOT in hearing about how great the inventor, seller or best friend of the above think the whateveritis is. Bettina B Return to table of contents
Date: Monday, 12 July 93 13:39:25 CST From: LLAPV at utxdp.dp.utexas.edu Subject: dark wheat Howdy, Johann Klaassen is worried about how his wheat beer is coming out darker than expected (HBD 1179). Just impress your friends with the Dunkelweiss recipe you developed, & everything should be okay. However, if you want to do a Weiss, see if you can get Alexander's extract. I think it's 60% barley / 40% wheat. I've never personally tried it, but I hear that it works. Alan, Austin Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1993 12:31:24 -0700 (PDT) From: Domenick Venezia <venezia at zgi.com> Subject: Pike Place Yeast In HBD #1179 Michael Tavis asks, > My only questions is: Is the yeast I cultured the same yeast used in > fermentation or is a yeast used for bottle conditioning? I called the Pike Place Brewery, and the gentleman that answered (did not get his name) was very helpfull. At the tail end of the fermentation (primary or secondary?) the fermenter is sealed and allowed to pressurize. It is then cooled to help dissolve more CO2, and flocculate the yeast, then they bottle using a counter flow pressure system. So, the yeast Michael cultured is what they use to ferment. Domenick Venezia ZymoGenetics, Inc. venezia at zgi.com Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 93 14:59:14 EDT From: LeRoy S. Strohl <lstrohl at s850.mwc.edu> Subject: Re: J Klaassen's wheat beer I think you provided the answer - the boil is too. Try your next batch at twenty five minutes. I have successfully used the M&F Wheat (two cans with 1 pound of malted wheat mashed in 3cups of 150F water and sparged to add to wort to make 5 gallons) with 1 1/2 Hallertau plug hops to make a very satisfying, pale wheat ale. The last batch I added a hop tea of Hallertau to add to the aroma and liked the results. Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 93 11:14:11 MST From: birkelan at adtaz.sps.mot.com (Joel Birkeland) Subject: electric surface heating elements I would like to find an electric surface heating element which could be used for a 6 - 8 gallon boil. Right now I do a 2.5 gallon boil using the 1 kW element on my kitchen stove, which takes about 30 to 45 minutes. All else being equal, seems I could use a 2 - 3 kW element. Note that I don't intend to replace the stovetop element. I want to make a stand-alone unit that I could use in the garage or outside with a 10 gallon stainless pot. Thanks in advance. Joel Birkeland Motorola SPS (602) 897-4359 Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 93 22:46:59 GMT From: Martin Wilde <martin at gamma.intel.com> Subject: Re:Pike Place Yeast In digest #1179, Mike Tavis writes: > Alright all you Seattle-ites, here's a question for you. > A few months ago a friend of mine brought me a bottle of Pike's Place > back from Seattle. I tried it and absolutely loved the fruitiness > (esters?) of this ale. I assumed that it was due to the yeast used in > making the beer, so when another friend went to Seattle I made sure he > brought me back another bottle so I could try and culture the yeast > out of it. > Well last night after several starter solutions and some offerings to > the gods of beer I have what looks like a healthy Pike's Place sample. > My only questions is: Is the yeast I cultured the same yeast used in > fermentation or is a yeast used for bottle conditioning? Mike, yes you have the fermentation strain. Pike Place is a single strain yeast. Since they Irish Moss their beer I am suprised you obtained any yeast from the bottle. I was told by the brewery - Good luck... Then I took them a quart jar and they gave me some yeast... This strain is a good strong fermenter. Not much esters and other flavors. martin (NOT Seattle - But Portland) Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1993 15:59:37 -0500 (CDT) From: BIRMINGHAM at FNE683.FNAL.GOV (Yeah, yeah, yeah) Subject: Bizarre homebrewer behavior >From: akcs.chrisc at vpnet.chi.il.us (chris campanelli) >.... Although most homebrewers >prefer the seven gallon carboy because of the extra headspace, I buy them >because I like to wear the way-cool styrofoam pod on my head when I take >a shower. You should try it some time. This is the sort of behavior I have come to expect from people who use Sierra Nevada Pale Ale (amen) as slug bait. :-) Seriously, does anybody know of a cheap *local* (to the Chicago area) source for 25-liter acid carboys? I picked one up for ten bucks at an antique store last weekend, but I doubt they get many of those. Later, Phillip - -- Phillip J. Birmingham birmingham at fne683.fnal.gov "'Evian' is 'naive' spelled backwards. That's what you are if you buy bottled water. Drink gin instead." -- Milk and Cheese's Fourth #1 Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1993 12:25:24 -0800 From: pohl at unixg.ubc.ca (Derrick Pohl) Subject: Extract darkening with boil In HBD #1179, Johann Klaassen writes: >Could it be that my hour-long boils have darkened >the otherwise light malt (which would shock me)? Funny you should mention this, because this very weekend I was at my local brew store talking to the guy there about brewing with extract. I usually brew all-grain, but due to time constraints I'm doing an extract batch next, and so I was getting some advice on it. He said that boiling does indeed darken malt - he thinks it's actually an oxidation process and that splashing the wort around a lot when hot darkens it even more. His solution: do a mini-mash of your specialty grains first (crystal, chocolate, etc.), strain the grain out, then boil the hops in that water, and only add the extract for the last twenty minutes of the boil, thus minimizing the time the extract is boiling, but still giving you the full time for the hop boil. How does this technique sound to the more experienced extract brewers out there? - ----- Derrick Pohl (pohl at unixg.ubc.ca) UBC Faculty of Graduate Studies, Vancouver, B.C. Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 93 13:54 PDT From: Charles T Jacob <ct_jacob at pnlg.pnl.gov> Subject: Hot Mash!!! Since there are many of you out there who have created "Mashes" (No hard liquor of course) I have an unusual request for a hot pepper mash. Not to make beer with although it's been done in the past. I make my own Habanero (This can also makes one hot but fruity beer) hot sauce and would like to make a sauce using a mash that has aged for 1 month to a year. Is there anyone out there who could give me advice on how to go about making a good mash?? Please E-mail me privatly. Winning response gets a homemade bottle of sauce to put on your dog while your drinking a homebrew. Charley Greenbelt, MD Internet: ct_jacob at pnl.gov Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 93 23:55:00 +0000 From: WHEATON_JOHN/HPBOI1_03 at hpdmd48.boi.hp.com Subject: Not enough body/SF area brewpubs Response to Ed Wolfe Beer Body I use at least 1/2 to 1 lb Dextrin malt in my mash for an acceptable level of body. This malt must be crushed and mashed with your 2-row. You can use dextrin powder and add directly to your boil but I have never experimented with it as I went to all-grain before I had the chance. SF area brewpubs If you can, check out the Anchor Brewing Co. on Potrero Hill in the South part of the city just off of Hwy 101. The fresh beer is outstanding, not like your bottled stuff! Try a 50-50 mix of Liberty Ale and Old Foghorn Barley Wine, you'll never be the same. Pick up a Celebrator magazine when you get there and you will have an instant guide to the local micros. Call Anchor Brewing or SF Brewing Co. on where to get a copy. For the Jurassic Park of micro brewing you MUST visit Buffalo Bill's in Hayward, enough said. John W. - HP Boise, ID Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1993 18:43:34 -0400 (EDT) From: Edward Croft <CROFTE at delphi.com> Subject: Re Brewpubs in Providence Caleb, I tried to answer via private E-mail, but the user ADMCR was rejected. Anyway, I live about twenty minutes from Providence and as yet I don't believe that any brewpubs have been started there. The closest that I know of are in Boston, about 50 minutes drive. As far as suppliers, there are a few within forty minutes drive from Brown. If you E-mail me once you get to Brown, I will send them on to you. Sorry about the bandwidth, but I couldn't get through. E Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 12 Jul 1993 18:49:58 -0400 (EDT) From: Edward Croft <CROFTE at delphi.com> Subject: Fruit quantities in beer I am interested in trying my hand at a couple of fruit beers. I was wondering if anyone has put together a chart that shows how much fruit to add for five gallon batch. Also, whether to add to the wort, primary, secondary, or bottle. Also weather to cut, blanch, or whatever. It would look something like this. Fruit WGT. Conditioning Wort Primary Secondary Bottle Blueberry 10# Blanched X Orange 10# Cooked X,last 5m Orange 10# Cooked X,last 5m Prunes 5# Blanched X Of course, the above are fictional, but maybe someone who knows these things can fill in the blanks. TIA, Ed Return to table of contents
Date: Monday, 12 July 1993 14:11 PT From: scott.powell at amail.amdahl.com Subject: Beer in the White House I was digging through some of my old books and I found one I had forgotten about. It's titled _The_White_House_Cook_Book.__A_Comprehensive_Cyclopedia_of _Information_for_the_Home_. It was first written in 1887 (though I have a second printing from 1907) by Hugo Zieman (Steward of the White House) and Mrs. F.L. Gillette. Here are the beer recipes I found. Hop Beer Take five quarts of water, six ounces of hops, boil it three hours; then strain the liquor, add to it five quarts of water, four ounces of bruised ginger root; boil this again twenty minutes, strain and add four pounds of sugar. When lukewarm put in a pint of yeast. Let it ferment twenty-four hours it will be ready for bottling. Ginger Beer Put into a kettle two ounces of powdered ginger root (or more if it not very strong), half an ounce of cream of tartar, two large lemons, cut into slices, two pounds of broken loaf sugar and two gallons of soft boiling water. Simmer them over a slow fire for half an hour. When the liquor is nearly cold, stir into it a large tablespoon of the best yeast. After it has fermented, which will be in about twenty-four hours, bottle for use. Spruce Beer Allow an ounce of hops and a spoonful of ginger to a gallon of water. When well boiled, strain it and put in a pint of molasses, or a pound of brown sugar, and a half on ounce or less of the essence of spruce; when cool add a teacupful of yeast and put into a clean tight cask, and let it ferment for a day or two, then bottle it for use. You can boil sprigs of spruce fir in place of the essence. Egg Flip, or Mulled Ale Boil one quart of good ale with some nutmeg; beat up six eggs and mix them with a little cold ale; then pour the hot ale into it, and pour it back and forth several times to prevent its curdling; warm and stir it till sufficiently thick; add a piece of butter or a glass of brandy and serve it with dry toast. (I'm going to try this at a Homebrew party in August) >From what I gathered about this book it is a compilation of information from the recipes and experiences of the White House staff since the time it was first occupied (circa ????) till 1887. | Scott B. Powell, sbp00 at amail.amdahl.com -- I drive the Scoboni -- | | (insert standard disclaimer here) | Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 08:01:21 -0400 From: jchism at mtmis1.mis.semi.harris.com (Jami Chism) Subject: re-using yeast slurry >When fermenting with liquid yeasts, is there a simple way to use the >slurry on the bottom of the secondary for pitching into a new batch? >Any comments on the amount to use would be helpful. Also, is there >a method for storing such a slurry for later use? I have been re-using yeast slurry for several years. My method is to add a cup or so of cool water to the slurry after I've racked off of it and swirl it around, mixing the slurry really good with the water, then pouring it into a sterilized glass quart jar. I let this sit at room temp for several hours until there is noticable seperation, then pour the top liquid layer off. I again add about a cup of cool water to the yeast, mix it up good, cover and let sit at room temp for several hours. Pour off top layer, pour the resulting yeast cake into a sterile canning jar, cap and store in the refridgerator until you're ready to brew again. This is better know as washing yeast and the method can be used with either dry or liquid yeasts. I have been usually re-use a package of yeast anywhere from 7 to 10 brewing sessions before it starts to appear suspicious. Cheers, Jami Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 08:23:27 EDT From: bszymcz%ulysses at relay.nswc.navy.mil (Bill Szymczak) Subject: Re: Seriously Stupid Advice In HBD1179 John DeCarlo writes: >Plus, if I really want info on, say, wort chillers, a well-designed posting >containing a stupid theory works wonders <grin>. >>From: korz at iepubj.att.com >>Back to microbiology. Besides the zillions of bacteria on your hands, >>there are hundreds of zillions of bacteria in your mouth. Sucking on a >>siphon hose with your mouth is probably one of the best ways to infect >>your beer with lactobacillus which is everpresent in the human mouth. >>Lactobacillus will eat sugars that the yeast have left behind and cause >>your beer to gush about four to six weeks after bottling. >Well, Al, I appreciate your posting of seriously stupid advice, but the >"start siphon with mouth" issue comes up all the time and many (including >myself) have no problems with this approach. I always *start* my siphoning >with boiled water in the tube, but whenever it stops for some reason, I end >up using my mouth. In four years, my only infection has been because I >used an infected starter. I can just see the testimonials pouring in again. I probably shouldn't get involved here, but I'm a bit confused. Are you saying it's impossible to get an infection using your mouth when starting a siphon? Because if it is possible, then why is Al's advice "seriously stupid"? The fact that you have not gotten any infections using a siphon by mouth seems analogous to not getting lung cancer after smoking for 30 years, or not getting killed while driving without a seat belt, or not getting an infection while having sex without a condom. All these are likely outcomes but since they are all possible any advice on not smoking, or on wearing seat belts, or a condom aren't "seriously stupid". If you believe the chances of infection are so remote that one shouldn't worry about it, then why not use your mouth all the time instead of using boiled water? Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1993 09:00:26 -0400 (EDT) From: roman at tix.timeplex.com (Daniel Roman) Subject: Re: NO2 is NOT used in Guinness! > >5. Are any home brewers using the NO2 cartridge for their homebrew, or > >contemplating trying it? > > No, but i have thought about buying a second CO2 cylinder and having it filled > with 40% N2 and 60% CO2 for some winter stouts out of my keg. Has anyone > done this with success (ie: brewed a stout and dispensed it w/ a nice creamy > head ala guinness?). It is my understanding that you will need a different type of tap to completely duplicate the creamy head. The taps used for Guinness must add some turbulance or some other effect whereas the standard beer taps go for smooth flow so as not to knock the CO2 out of solution. I have not found a bar owner who would let me take their Guiness tap apart to find out but I do keep trying. - -- Dan Roman Internet: roman at tix.timeplex.com // ccMail: roman_d at timeplex.com GEnie: D.ROMAN1 \X/ Only AMIGA! Return to table of contents
Date: 13 Jul 1993 08:27:08 GMT From: "Tom Stolfi" <WAUTS at cwemail.ceco.com> Subject: NOTE 07/13/93 08:27:54 From: Tom Stolfi I have a homebrewing friend going to Toronto in August.Can anyone recommend a few Brewpubs for him to try??? Thanks. Tom Stolfi wauts at cwemail.ceco.com Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1993 09:33:22 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Griggers <brew at devine.ColumbiaSC.NCR.COM> Subject: Parking in Portland I will be attending the AHA's Brewing Frontiers in Portland, Oregon. When I picked up my airline ticket yesterday, I discovered yet another cost for this trip. I will be flying into Seattle and driving a rental car to Portland. One big shock came when my travel agent informed me that the parking charge at the Marriott is $14 a day. Parking the car for a week will cost almost as much as the car rental. I don't plan on using the car very much during the conference, but I do want to have a car for a couple of days to sight-see after the conference and Brewers Festival. Does anyone have a suggestion on where to park? Renting the car "by the day" is out because they have a $75 drop-off charge. Maybe some other combination of travel would work (air, bus, rail, boat, ???). -jim griggers brew at devine.columbiasc.ncr.com Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 93 08:54:35 EDT From: lyons%adc3 at swlvx2.msd.ray.com Subject: RE: Shake, Shake, Shake I followed Mike Lemons advice in HBD #1171 about shaking the primary vigorously to airate the wort. I pitched the liquid yeast (Wyeast #1338 - European, no starter!) at 79F at stored the primary at 72F until fermentation kicked in. With in 12 hours the fermentation was under way. Pitching liquid yeast in a well airated wort, at slightly warm temperatures, will result in short lag times with out the need for a starter. Thanks Mike! Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 6 Jul 93 09:20:33 EDT From: lyons%adc3 at swlvx2.msd.ray.com Subject: RE: Pressure/temperature relationship Keith writes in HBD #1174: >Someone a couple of issues ago asked what would be the proper pressure to >get the same volume of CO2 at a temperature of 70F. > >At the risk of getting technical, there is an easy solution given by the >ideal gas law. Holding volume and mass constant, the pressure is equal to >the original pressure times the new temperature all divided by the original >temperature. That is: > >P2 = P1*T2/T1 > >This does not take into account the solubility of the CO2 in the beer, but >it should be close enough for your needs. Just want to mention, that you should convert the temperatures (T2 & T1) to absolute temperatures before taking the ratio. It does make a difference in the result. Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 09:59:12 EDT From: "Anton Verhulst" <verhulst at zk3.dec.com> Subject: Irish Moss Jeff Frane asks: I'm interested in hearing about people's experience using Irish Moss as a kettle fining agent. I had been using it off and on for years, without being able to notice any difference when I remembered to add it. Eventually, I stop bothering all together, and since I was using 1056 yeast almost exclusively, I hadn't any problems with clarity. I recently made a steam beer using Papazian's all grain recipe. The recipe called for Irish moss but I decided to omit it. After a month in secondary the brew had a permanent haze that just wouldn't go away. On a hunch, I boiled 1/2 tsp irish moss in a quart of water for 10 munutes and after cooling added to the secondary and mixed well. Within minutes globs of solids formed (I love technical terms :-) and settled to the bottom. Within 24 hours the brew was crystal clear - I mean CLEAR! The beer is currently on tap and is great. - --Tony Verhulst P.S. I had done a protein rest (122F for 30 min) and the iodine test was negative for starch. Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 14:22:00 +0000 From: DAMON_NOEL/HP0800_01 at mailhub.cs.itc.hp.com Subject: Invert sugar Spencer Thomas asks for a source of invert sugar...it's used in candy making. Any local cake decorating/candy making operation should carry the stuff, also they sell a substance (I think it's an acid) which you can use to convert ordinary sugar to invert. Check the yellow pages for "Candy & Confectionery- Retail". Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 09:17 CDT From: fjdobner at ihlpb.att.com Subject: Duvel The recent post on Duvel got me thinking about something I read in Jackson's Belgian beers book. On page 216 paragraph 3, it states "A proportion of dextrose is added before primary fermentation, to boost alcohol and further attenuation." Well, my understanding of dextrose is that it is not largely fermentable (by commonly used yeast). How could the dextrose boost alcohol and further attenuation. Perhaps its in the type of yeast used. Jean De Clerck at it again. A further reference to dextrose being used in priming after cold maturation and yeast compaction (see last paragraph same page). It is also interesting to note that the maturation for this top-fermented product is so low: 30.2F or -2C. After maturation they drop the temperature to 26.6F (-3C) for compaction and precipitation of the yeast bed. All this happens prior to conditioning. During which the temperature is boosted to 71.6F (22C). My experience with yeast is after it has sedimented and been treated in such a cold manner that it doesn't take to a quick revival. Must be a truly remarkable yeast. Frank Dobner Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 9:31:23 MDT From: Jeff Benjamin <benji at hpfcbug.fc.hp.com> Subject: Re: 6oz bottles > My question is: Where can I get 6-8oz bottles from? Coca-Cola has recently started selling Coke in 6-packs of 8oz bottles (at least here in Colorado). The bottles are nice heavy glass and take normal crown caps, not screw-ons. I've used them quite successfully to bottle strong ales and such. Check out your local grocery stores. Donate the bottle contents to your friends if you're not fond of Coke or if you'd rather try to win a syringe :-/. The disadvantages are that the glass is clear, so you need a dark case to store them, and you have to live with the screened "Coke" label. - -- Jeff Benjamin benji at hpfcla.fc.hp.com Hewlett Packard Co. Fort Collins, Colorado "Midnight shakes the memory as a madman shakes a dead geranium." - T.S. Eliot Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 8:30:36 PDT From: gbaldw at zaphodusin.com (Gordon Baldwin) Subject: Irish Moss In #1079 Jeff Fane asks about others experience with Irish Moss and recommends using 1 Tablespoon per 5 gallon batch. I have been having similar problems with Irish Moss. I use 1/2 to 1 teaspoon per 5 gallons, and it doesn't seem to make any difference if I add it or not. My beers are mostly clear with a slight chill haze. Some have a fairly high amount of chill haze. When should the irish moss be added to the boil. I think Papazian suggests 5 minutes from the end of the boil, and the instructions on the packet of irish moss I got from the homebrew store say 30 minutes. (It could be the other way around) From what Jeff is saying it looks like it should be added as the wort is heating up before the boil. So when is the best time to add it? Gordon Baldwin Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1993 11:37:55 -0400 (EDT) From: bickham at msc.cornell.edu Subject: Good news for micros in New York State According to one of the editors of the Schenectady paper, the New York State legislature actually approved a decrease in the licensing fee for a microbrewery or brewpub. It will now be $250, which is approximately a factor of 10 less than the $2000+ fee one had to pay last year. Now if I just had a few hundred thousand for capital equipment ;-) Scott - -- ======================================================================== Scott Bickham | LASSP and Materials Science Center | bickham at msc.cornell.edu ========================================================================= Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1993 09:08:02 -0700 (PDT) From: gummitch at techbook.com (Jeff Frane) Subject: Gas (urp!) JC Ferguson: > > > > >5. Are any home brewers using the NO2 cartridge for their homebrew, or > >contemplating trying it? > > No, but i have thought about buying a second CO2 cylinder and having it filled > with 40% N2 and 60% CO2 for some winter stouts out of my keg. Has anyone > done this with success (ie: brewed a stout and dispensed it w/ a nice creamy > head ala guinness?). > Although I haven't bought a second tank myself, I have sampled homebrew served this way -- only it was a brown ale rather than a stout, and the creaminess and head retention were both truly remarkable. I don't know if this qualifies as "cheating", but the end result was terrific. Only stubborness (and the fact that the CO2 company is two blocks away) prevents me from making the conversion. Jim Busch agrees with John Mare: > > John Mare makes some excellent points regarding English IPAs: > > <In a recent discussion on India Pale Ales (IPA's) the assertion was made > <that these are all high gravity ales. [text deleted ] > > This is absolutely true. In fact I had troubles locating a IPA as high > as 1.046 OG. Even "strong ales" tend to be around 1.052 and are regarded > with fear from many pub goers. It is really sad to find this attitude, > since as a result these beers tend to be some of the oldest and less crisp > cask ales to be found. Of course, the higher gravity gives them a slight > edge on shelf life. Note how much residual sugar is in the R&D Deucher > IPA at only 3.9 ABV with an OG of 1.048. This can be true of the ordinary > bitters too. > Actually, what's amazing to me is not British "fear" of stronger ales, but the fact that British brewers can produce such flavorful beers at such low gravities. But Jim is right: a British relative went on at great length about how my 1.050 beer tasted like a barleywine. You should have seen his eyes bug when I served him a real strong ale! I suspect part of the "fear", however, stems from the British propensity for session drinking. Beers in the 1.030-1.035 range certainly lend themselves to spending the whole evening in the pub and still being able to find one's way home. (Of course, as Andy Capp has it: "You know where I live, Chalky knows where I live. We don't _all_ need to know.") - --Jeff Return to table of contents
Date: 13 Jul 1993 12:00:05 -0500 From: "Daniel F McConnell" <Daniel.F.McConnell at med.umich.edu> Subject: Irish moss/hot break? Subject: Time:11:54 AM OFFICE MEMO Irish moss/hot break? Date:7/13/93 Jeff asks about Irish moss users. I also used to use it (powdered) when I remembered (about half the time) and could notice no significant difference in clarity. 1 full teaspoon/5 gal. for the last 10 or so minutes of boling. When I ran out I did not buy more. My kegs would condition for about 2 months in the cool cellar. Recently I have been supplying my father on a regular basis and the beer now seems disappear twice as fast (at least!). In the shortened conditioning phase I had noticed a clarity problem which I attributed to process changes that I made when I increased my brew length. Then I happened to notice the Irish moss FLAKES at my local supplier. Since I'm a sucker for anything new/different I tried them. Suddenly the clarity problem is GONE. Imagine that. I am convinced. But I am confused about one statement >So I used Irish Moss in my most recent brew, and the results were pretty >amazing -- a very dramatic hot break... Hot break? You make no mention about time of addition. I always thought IM was to be added very late in the boil, well after the hot break had formed. DanMcC Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 1993 09:11:25 -0700 (MST) From: cjohnm at ccit.arizona.edu (John Mare) Subject: RE:Homebrew Digest #1180 (July 13, 1993) I heartily agree with Jim Busch's assertion that Jim Koch's efforts in assembling a fine brewery at Jamaica Plains, and taking the trouble to experiment with a variety of unusual (for the USA) beers is good for craft brewing. I have visited the brewery, and was very impressed with the knowledge of our guide, and with the beers we tasted. We don't have to like the guy to acknowledge that he has helped shift the focus of the common beer drinkers to something better. John M. Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 11:37:28 EST From: Andrius Tamulis <ATAMULIS at ucs.indiana.edu> Subject: Publist at sierra Yesterday I uploaded the publist from sierra.stanford.edu and noticed that 1) it had out-of-date info. on it - the old Sieben's brewery, more recently used by Berghoff, in Chicago is now closed. 2) It did not have the info. I was looking for - I've heard that there is a brewpub in the Evansville, IN area that brews a chili pepper beer, and I wanted to find it. So - I'd like to find out how this list is being updeated. Please, please, don't get me wrong - it was obviously a great chore just to put out such a list, keeping it current must be impossible. I'd just like an email address to send info to - like the Berghoff closing in Chicago, and this Evansville brewery, if I ever find it. thanks, andrius atamulis at ucs.indiana.edu Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 10:51 MTS From: Chuck Coronella <CORONELLRJDS at CHE.UTAH.EDU> Subject: Irish Moss Jeff Frane brings up the subject of Irish Moss. I've always used it, but since my beers are never light colored, it doesn't make a helluva difference. That I've noticed. But I'm curious about one thing. Papazian et al say to add IM 10 - 15 minutes before the end of the boil. This seems to contradict what Jeff (Dr. Fix?) says about helping the hot break. Doesn't the hot break happen near the beginning of the boil? On other thing. A while ago, I experimented with with larger amounts (like what Jeff suggests) and I remember having some problem, (Maybe low SG?). I'll have to check my notes at home. Brew hard, Chuck Return to table of contents
Date: Tue, 13 Jul 93 12:28 CDT From: arf at genesis.mcs.com (Jack Schmidling) Subject: Nitrogen >From: 12-Jul-1993 0931 -0400 <ferguson at zendia.enet.dec.com> >5. Are any home brewers using the NO2 cartridge for their homebrew, or >contemplating trying it? <No, but i have thought about buying a second CO2 cylinder and having it filled with 40% N2 and 60% CO2 for some winter stouts out of my keg. Has anyone done this with success (ie: brewed a stout and dispensed it w/ a nice creamy head ala guinness?). It is difficult or impossible to mix at home and keep it mixed. You can buy it already mixed in a product called Alagal. They roll it for hours to mix it properly. I tried it, it's cute but not much can be said beyond that. The head seems to form a little strangely but I could detect no particular difference in the feel of the carbonation or in the lingering head. Contrary to popular notions, the product was developed to make more money not better head. The fact that it does not disolve into the beer means that high pressures can be used at the source for rapid dispensing at remote taps. Football stadiums and ball parks are the best customers so that should give you a clue as to the objective. It is impossible to force carbonate beer with this stuff so you definately need two separate tanks. The method I used was to pressure up the keg at 50 psi with the mix and shake it for a few minutes. No matter how long you do this, there is no noticeable drop in pressure or other indication that anything is happening but some nitrogen is disolved. I then purge the tank and carbonate in the usual manner with CO2, then purge again and rest it over night with the mix at 30 psi, then reduce to normal dispensing pressure. I rented the mix just to experiment with and returned it a few weeks ago as another idea of little value to homebrewers. js Return to table of contents
End of HOMEBREW Digest #1181, 07/14/93