HOMEBREW Digest #205 Thu 20 July 1989

[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]

	FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
		Rob Gardner, Digest Coordinator

Contents:
  Homebrew Digest #204 (July 19, 1989) (ferguson ct 71078)
  Re: Lager question (John D. Polstra)
  Bottling in 2 Liter Pop Bottles (ferguson ct 71078)
  Wanted: Cider Clues/Recipes (Brian Atkins)

Send submissions to homebrew%hpfcmr at hplabs.hp.com Send requests to homebrew-request%hpfcmr at hplabs.hp.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 19 Jul 89 11:45:23 EDT From: ferguson%X102C at HARRIS-ATD.COM (ferguson ct 71078) Subject: Homebrew Digest #204 (July 19, 1989) >It was my understanding that lagers should sit in the carboy for >at least a month. This brew, however, looks as if it's ready to >bottle and age. I have noticed a quick fermentation in the past >using Red Star lager yeast for steam beer. The product was quite >good however. > >What would you recommend--bottling or further aging in the carboy? >Thanks. > >[Florian Bell, Boonesborough, Oregon] I have never been able to successfully correlate brewing time with anything. I generally brew 10 gallons at a time in two 5 gallon fermenters. In spite of my reasonable efforts to ensure consistency between the two fermenters, they never finish fermenting at the same time. The worst case was a batch where one 5 gallon fermenter finished in less than three days whereas the other was still merrily bubbling along after 3 weeks. I bottled both because I was tired of waiting and didn't want the fast batch to spoil. Both tasted great at bottling time and tasted even better after some bottle aging. If the beer is finished fermenting, my advice is to bottle it. Is the specific gravity where you expected it? If it is, it seems pointless to keep it in the fermenter an longer. Chuck Ferguson Harris Government Information Systems Division (407) 984-6010 MS: W1/7732 PO Box 98000 Melbourne, FL 32902 Internet: ferguson%cobra at trantor.harris-atd.com Usenet: uunet!x102a!x102c!ferguson Return to table of contents
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 89 09:25:47 PDT From: polstra!jdp at uunet.UU.NET (John D. Polstra) Subject: Re: Lager question In HOMEBREW Digest #204, florianb at tekred.cna.tek.com asks about a lager that fermented down very quickly: > It was my understanding that lagers should sit in the carboy for > at least a month. This brew, however, looks as if it's ready to > bottle and age. I have noticed a quick fermentation in the past > using Red Star lager yeast for steam beer. The product was quite > good however. > > What would you recommend--bottling or further aging in the carboy? Age it, definitely. Even though the fermentation is practically finished, the cold aging in the carboy will really make a difference. Rough flavors will go away, and what remains will have that delicate balance of flavors that makes a lager so good. Also, the long cold aging contributes to the lacy, egg-white head that is found on top of a quality lager. I'd say that a month is the bare minimum if you're aiming for real quality. I usually aim for at least 8 weeks in the refrigerator. By the way, aging in the bottles doesn't seem to do the trick. It's much better to age it in the carboy, before bottling. I wonder why your brew fermented so fast . . . Did you start it out warm, or did it go straight into the fridge? Normally, I keep it at room temperature only until the fermentation is good and active. Then I chill it gradually down to 45 degrees or so. I try to rack it when the gravity is around 1.018. (That's for all-grain beer with an O.G. of around 1.050.) One final thing, sorry I can't resist: > Using Red Star lager yeast (I know, I know), ... Hey, Florian . . . throw out that s**t. Buy a liquid yeast, *any* liquid yeast. You'll never regret it. The complete absence of "crud" flavors, which take months to age out when a dry yeast is used, will blow your socks off. Using liquid yeast is the single most effective aid I have found for brewing high-quality beers. -- John Polstra jdp at polstra.UUCP Polstra & Co., Inc. ...{uunet,sun}!practic!polstra!jdp Seattle, WA (206) 932-6482 Return to table of contents
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 89 12:57:45 EDT From: ferguson%X102C at HARRIS-ATD.COM (ferguson ct 71078) Subject: Bottling in 2 Liter Pop Bottles It is my contention that the most labor-intensive aspect of homebrewing (for most of us, anyway) is bottling. Kegging was not really an option for me because I just can't spare that much room in my refrigerator for a keg. I have heard it is feasible to bottle in champagne bottles. Some champagne bottles have a lip on them that will accept a bottle cap and some bottle cappers are high enough to cap a champagne bottle. Unfortunately, I was not able to lay my hands on a suitable supply of empty champagne bottles and I had no desire to drink sufficient quantities of champagne to collect my own supply. I heard of a homebrewer who bottled in 2 liter pop bottles and decided to try it myself. About three weeks ago I bottled my first batch in this manner and after consuming two bottles I have concluded that the approach works great. The bottles are very well carbonated and are holding pressure quite nicely. Aside from the labor reduction, there are several side benefits of this bottling approach that I think net readers might be interested in: o You can squeeze the plastic bottles and get a "feel" as to how well carbonated the brew is. When fully carbonated, the bottle is as hard as a rock. o 2 liter bottles are as easy to clean as regular beer bottles. I have one of those bottle washers that attaches to a faucett and has a valve on the tip (as described in a recent HB digest). It works fine with 2 liter bottles because the bottle length is only a little longer than a 12 oz beer bottle. Nicer yet, most pop bottles are clear so you can *SEE* trash in the bottles when you clean them. o I believe the rupture strength of 2 liter plastic bottles is higher than for a glass bottle. I cannot confirm this claim but feel confident it is true. I have seen 2 liter pop bottles pressurized to about 150 psi without rupturing (don't ask how I know this because it involves a long and bizzare story about my dad and his bottle rockets). I have no idea what the rupture strength of glass bottles is but I doubt it is as high. The advantage to homebrewers is that you can add more priming sugar for better head and better carbonation retention for partially consumed bottles. o The bigger bottle doesn't stir the yeast sediment as much when pouring. The result is cleaner pours. The transparent bottles allow the sediment to be more easily observed during pouring. Also, the yeast sediment is thicker and has a more "pastey" consistency and tends to cling to the bottom of the bottle when pouring. Has anyone else tried bottling in 2 liter bottles that can confirm my findings or warn of possible hazards? Does anyone have any data on the rupture strength of 12oz. glass beer bottles? Chuck Ferguson Harris Government Information Systems Division (407) 984-6010 MS: W1/7732 PO Box 98000 Melbourne, FL 32902 Internet: ferguson%cobra at trantor.harris-atd.com Usenet: uunet!x102a!x102c!ferguson Return to table of contents
Date: Wed, 19 Jul 89 10:09:22 pdt From: Brian Atkins <atkins at hpindqa> Subject: Wanted: Cider Clues/Recipes Full-Name: Brian Atkins I have been brewing extract and combined extract/grain beer for about 3 years now and would like to try something new. What is required for cider brewing in terms of equipment and ingredients? Are there any good books on the subject? Finally, does anyone know any good recipes for Cider? An English friend of mine says Natch is is a good cider. Does anyone know where Natch can be had in the greater San Jose area (as close to Sunnyvale as possible) and/or the greater San Fransisco area (as near Noe Valley as possible)? Is there a homebrew recipe for Natch like cider? Cheers! Brian Atkins Return to table of contents
Brian Atkins atkins at hpindqa.HP.COM (408) 447-2057 Hewlett Packard Information Networks Division - 43LS 19420 Homestead Road, Cupertino, CA 95014 Return to table of contents
End of HOMEBREW Digest #205, 07/20/89
[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]
HTML-ized on 06/29/00, by HBD2HTML version 1.2 by K.F.L.
webmaster at hbd.org, KFL, 10/9/96