Homebrew Digest Friday, 14 June 1996 Number 2071

[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]


   FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
        Shawn Steele, Digest Janitor
        Thanks to Rob Gardner for making the digest happen!

Contents:
  Wichita Festival of Beers (Rob Moline)
  Malt Mill Motor? Help! (JJBrewer at aol.com)
  Improved quality? ("Bridges, Scott")
  thermal expansion (DONBREW at aol.com)
  BOTULISM?????? (CLAY at clust1.clemson.edu)
  Re:Close call. (Kerry Drake)
  What is "maltose syrup"? (Jim Youngmeyer)
  Re:Quality on the HBD (Kerry Drake)
  re: Hydraulic conductivity of barley / re: Digest Forma ("Keith Royster")
  Steam Beer (tm) not! (Jim Busch)
  RE: LongShot Pale Ale (George_De_Piro at berlex.com (George De Piro))
  It's thinner than U think ... (Michael Owings)
  Thermal expansion of glass (gameier at fmc.com (Gary A. Meier))
  Ester Formation w/ respect to aeration, etc. (George_De_Piro at berlex.com (George De Piro))
  Re: Greenville Micro ("Decker, Robin E.")
  yeast starter (TMCASTLE at am.pnu.com)
  Maximum draw for Gott cooler ("Gregory, Guy J.")
  Homebrew and International Borders (VLIEG BRIAN S)
  RE: Ominous moves (snsi at win.bright.net (Jeff Smith))
  Chlorine Dioxide Literature ("Palmer.John")
  Beer Carbonation (herron at wadsworth.org (Bruce Herron))
  Re: yeast strains (herron at wadsworth.org (Bruce Herron))
  re:RE:rE:Re: Skunky beer ("Patrick G. Babcock")
  Re: Improved quality? (shawn at aob.org (Shawn Steele))
  Re: join the esters thread! ("Tracy Aquilla")
  Attention (bturnbaugh at kktv.com)
  pilsner (Stetson)

NOTE NEW HOMEBREW ADDRESSES homebrew at aob.org (SUBMISSIONS only) homebrew-digest-request@ aob.org (for REQUESTS only) Send articles for __publication_only__ to homebrew at aob.org (Articles are published in the order they are received.) Send UNSUBSCRIBE and all other requests, ie, address change, etc., to homebrew-digest-request@ aob.org, BUT PLEASE NOTE that if you subscribed via BEER-L, you must unsubscribe by sending a one line e-mail to listserv at ua1vm.ua.edu that says: UNSUB BEER-L This list service is now being provided by majordomo at aob.org, so some of the commands may have changed. For technical problems send e-mail to the Digest Janitor, shawn at aob.org. If your account is being deleted, please be courteous and unsubscribe first. ARCHIVES & OTHER INFORMATION Please don't send me requests for back issues - you will be silently ignored. For "Cat's Meow" information, send mail to lutzen at alpha.rollanet.org or visit http://alpha.rollanet.org on the Web. Othere information is available by e-mail from info at aob.org and on the AHA's web site at http://www.aob.org/aob. ARCHIVES: An archive of previous issues of this digest, as well as other beer related information can be accessed via anonymous ftp at ftp.stanford.edu. Use ftp to log in as anonymous and give your full e-mail address as the password, look under the directory /pub/clubs/homebrew/beer directory. AFS users can find it at /afs/ir.stanford.edu/ftp/pub/clubs/homebrew/beer. If you do not have ftp capability you may access the files via e-mail using the ftpmail service at gatekeeper.dec.com. For information about this service, send an e-mail message to ftpmail at gatekeeper.dec.com with the word "help" (without the quotes) in the body of the message. Some archives are available via majordomo at aob.org.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Rob Moline <brewer at kansas.net> Date: Thu, 13 Jun 1996 23:51:28 -0500 Subject: Wichita Festival of Beers Yes, it's late... Yes, I'm slack... But the 3rd Annual Wichita Festival of Beer will be held on Saturday, 15 June in Wichita, Kansas.. This festival, originally considered by the brewers of the region to be a "show of products distributed by Standard Beverage...ONLY".... has developed in it's 3rd year to an event that even the state's brew-pubs have been invited to... it seems to be a worthy and comprehensive event this year... the only folks who won't have their beers there are those poor SOB's (like the Little Apple) who don't distribute...owing to the ABC laws that in effect limit the participation to those Breweries that have a distributor.... But with the assistance of the lawyers for the Kansas ABC..who agree that for such a limited and charitable purpose ..legislative changes may soon be pursued.. maybe next year we will get to participate.. and you too R.D.(High Noon Saloon!!)... Yes...it's VERY late notice... but for those of you in the region..wondering what to do on the 15th... check it out! BTW... The charity is the Leukemia Society.. over 40K$ raised last year! Cheers.. Jethro Gump Return to table of contents
From: JJBrewer at aol.com Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 01:49:57 -0400 Subject: Malt Mill Motor? Help! Greetings HBDers - In the midst of construction of my new RIMS system, I decided to purchase a new grain mill to handle the increased amounts of grain. NOT wanting to rekindle the mill thread, lets just say its a high quality mill suitable for motorization. This is where my problem begins. The motor I bought for $15 I am unsure of how to wire the thing. It has four wires: red (+hot?), black(-?), green (ground) and white (???). The red and black are connected to a capacitor while the white and green are loose. I am obviously not an electrical or motor guru, but was hoping someone here is or at least can provide some guidance on how to wire this, preferably with a switch, without causing my house to burn down and that of the neighborhood. It doesnt look like I just attach a plug to it and grind away and that capacitor makes me awful cautious. Pertinent Motor Data: Manufacturer: Robbins Myers Model: KP-M330-B0L 115 volts 60 hertz 1050 RPM 1/15 HP Single Phase, Continuous Duty The capacitor has no information on it. I appreciate any help/suggestions anyone has. I will summarize all public and private replies. Good Brewing, Jamey Johns San Ramon, CA JJBrewer at aol.com Return to table of contents
From: "Bridges, Scott" <bridgess at mmsmtp.ColumbiaSC.ATTGIS.COM> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 96 12:45:00 PDT Subject: Improved quality? >From: denisb at CAM.ORG (Denis Barsalo) >Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 23:32:12 -0500 >Subject: Quality on the HBD > > Is it just me or have you noticed the improved quality of the posts >on the HBD since it got moved to the AOB? What's going on, are we all on >our best behaviour or something. I haven't seen any bad-mouthing, or silly >ridiculous posts in over a week and a half...just intelligent, insightfull >posts that have been a real pleasure to read. I've hardly had to page down! > Keep it up people. Methinks Shawn has been doing some editing, perhaps????? :) Scott Return to table of contents
From: DONBREW at aol.com Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 07:29:23 -0400 Subject: thermal expansion Aaron Sepanski writes: Am i really running the risk of thermal expansion? Glass is a very poor conducter of heat, that's why stirring rods and such are made of glass in labs. The glass ware for cooking is extremely thin in comparion to a carboy. For my carboy to crack, there would have to be a very quick change in temp throughuot the glass. Because it conducts heat /cold very slowly this seems unreasonable doesn't it? When i possed my question I really wanted to no if any thing would happen to my beer not my equipment. You got it backwards. If a small part of a cool carboy suddenly becomes warm it WILL shatter. BTW, after you have broken a carboy you will modify your opinion of the thickness of the glass, it is incredibly thin. Also, the glass of a carboy is not tempered or chemically enhanced like Pyrex is. I once broke a carboy that had been sitting empty on the concrete floor during the winter by touching it with the toe of my sneaker, I mean literally just touching no movement of the carboy occurred at all!!! Don McArthur Falls Church, Va. Return to table of contents
From: CLAY at clust1.clemson.edu Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 08:23:22 -0400 (EDT) Subject: BOTULISM?????? Had same problem as Kyle w/ MF canned malt. After adding to boil, noticed white fuzzy stuff in former air space at top of can. Assumed it was "just some damn mold - what the hell, I'm gonna boil it anyway." Is my beer toxic? How do/will I know? (Cat doesn't like beer. Neighbors are friendly. In-laws too far away.) Product in question was wheat malt, BTW. Thanks in advance, C Return to table of contents
From: Kerry Drake <drakes at oklahoma.net> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 07:31:59 -0500 Subject: Re:Close call. Tim Haller writes: >...just as he walked by, it EXPLODED, sending on of the larger shards of glass whizzing >over the top (thank god!) of his head... >I am 99% sure that the fermentation was finished --. None of the other bottles that are 'aging' in my >basement (60 - 65 deg.) has 'popped'. >Until this happened, I was quite satisfied with my first attempt. It's hard >not to do the 'w' word when something like this happens... > >Any ideas anyone??? I think the temp in your basement might be the -problem-. In the winter, my bottle storage area maintains these same temperatures and it takes a looong time for the brew to condition, in excess of 6 weeks before it is palatable! Now that warmer weather is here it only takes a week or so (at 70 - 80 deg). A contributing factor may be the larger than standard bottle size of 22 oz. There was a discussion on bottle size-vs-carbonation level a few weeks ago with the consensus(?, like there ever really is) being that a larger bottle needs less priming sugar than a relatively smaller one for the same carbonation level. Although I use some of the same size bottles without incident, they do seem kind of thin for the task... Good luck, if they're done-keep 'em cool! Kerry Drake Return to table of contents
From: Jim Youngmeyer <youngmeyer at POSC.org> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 07:38:39 -0500 Subject: What is "maltose syrup"? On a recent trip to the UK I dropped by the CAMRA headquarters in St. = Albans and purchased one of their books, "How to Brew Real Ale". This = book is full of recipes for clones of many of Britain's most popular = ales. I noticed that an ingredient in many of the recipes is "maltose = syrup". This ingredient is not mentioned in any of my other brewing = books, although maltose is referred to as a simple, highly fermentable = sugar. My local homebrew shop does not carry maltose syrup. Does = anyone know where it can be obtained, or whether there are any suitable = substitutes (malt extract? brown sugar?) I want to brew an Ind. Cooper = Burton Ale clone! TIA, Jim Youngmeyer Houston, TX youngmeyer at posc.org Return to table of contents
From: Kerry Drake <drakes at oklahoma.net> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 07:45:26 -0500 Subject: Re:Quality on the HBD >From Denis Barsalo- > Is it just me or have you noticed the improved quality of the posts >on the HBD since it got moved to the AOB? What's going on, are we all on >our best behaviour or something. I haven't seen any ... silly >ridiculous posts in over a week and a half...just intelligent... > Keep it up people. > >Denis Until your post Denis? I think this one falls in the same category so page down with me <g>... Kerry Drake Return to table of contents
From: "Keith Royster" <keith.royster at ponyexpress.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 08:49:50 -0500 Subject: re: Hydraulic conductivity of barley / re: Digest Forma I wanted to say that I found GuyG4 at aol.com's post about hydraulic conductivity very interesting. I've always been amazed and fascinated by how many different vocations can be applied to the brewing process, which has I lot to do with why I find this hobby so enjoyable and educational. Many of us have learned more about fluid dynamics, metallurgy, chemistry, biology, every different kind of engineering (except maybe nuclear =), math and unit conversions, and now hydrogeology from homebrewing than we ever would have in the classroom simply because we have something interesting and practical to apply it to. Thanks again Guy4G, for the interesting post. - ---------------------------------------------------- On another note, Shawn informs us that the format of the HBD will be changing becuase of its growing size: > In order to try to solve problems with mailers that don't accept > messages over 50,000 bytes, I am now limiting the HBD to 50,000 > bytes. <snip> This will result in more varied delivery times... Just wanted to point out that this is all-the-more reason for some of us to practice our editing skills and stop using unnecessarily long signatures. While I think I've noticed a decline recently in the long signatures, I've also noticed an increase in posts where an entire previous post is commented-out and then followed by just a few lines of response. Often times there is very little reason to include the entire post you are responding to within your post. With just a little bit of time and effort you can edit it down to a summary and give the rest of us the HBD space to post our submissions. I just need you to refresh my memory, not spell it out for me. Keith Royster - Keith.Royster at ponyexpress.com Mooresville, North Carolina at your.service - http://dezines.com/ at your.service My RIMS page - http://dezines.com/ at your.service/RIMS Carolina HomeBrewers - http://dezines.com/ at your.service/cbm Return to table of contents
From: Jim Busch <busch at eosdev2.gsfc.nasa.gov> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 09:22:49 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Steam Beer (tm) not! This is a common misperception: <Anchor Brewing has trademarked the term "steam beer", so you won't find any <other commercial examples in this country with the words "steam beer" on the <label. Fritz may wish this but I dont think it will stand up when challenged. The mark is on Anchor Steam Beer, the exact words and logo. It is not on just Steam Beer. This means I could market a beer called Victory Original Steam Beer or a similar name. Not that I intend to but it is nonsense to believe that a style name can be marked. Can Sierra tm the name Pale Ale? The legality issues involve the determination of reasonable degree of confusion in the marketplace. Would Victory Original Steam Beer lead a consumer to believe they were actually pruchasing Anchor Steam Beer? I think not. And yes, marks can lose their rights once a term becomes commonly used in regular speech, such as Kleenex. Jim Busch (not a lawyer, so take it FWIW...., but I did work at the Patent Office long ago....) Return to table of contents
From: George_De_Piro at berlex.com (George De Piro) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 09:32:30 -0700 Subject: RE: LongShot Pale Ale Steve's post really struck a nerve with me, so forgive me if this is rude. Longshot pale ale an OKTOBERFEST? No, it isn't at all. The smell of Cascades that comes off Longshot PA is completely inappropriate to an Oktoberfest, as is the hop flavor, and bitter, dry finish. Malt is NOT the dominant flavor in Longshot. Longshot pale ale may not be as hoppy as some people would like, but Oktoberfest IS NOT HOPPY AT ALL!!! It is a malt-driven beer with some toastiness and just enough hop bitterness to make you appreciate the maltiness. Look in the Winter 1995 issue of Zymurgy for the style guidelines. If you're a real hop-head, this beer may be too bland for you, but I think it definitely exemplifies the style adequately. Try tasting a Spaten Ur Marzen alongside a Longshot Pale Ale and you'll see my point. I'm not really upset that you don't like Longshot, but I would hate to see your misconception of Oktoberfest continue. Please note: I don't think that Sam Adams Oktoberfest is a particularly good example of the style. It is too hoppy and dry. George De Piro (Nyack, NY) Return to table of contents
From: Michael Owings <mikey at waste.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 08:37:04 -0500 Subject: It's thinner than U think ... Aaron Sepanski wrote: > The glass ware for cooking is extremely thin in comparion to a > carboy. While emptying a carboy full of sanitizing solution a few months ago I accidentaly bumped it on the concrete lip of the outdoor drain I was dumping it in to. After patching up my wrist, I went back to the drain to clean up the mess, and was struck by the THINNESS of the walls of the carboy. I had always judged the thickness of the glass by the appearance of the carboy neck and mouth, which seem fairly thick. The walls, however, were little thicker than those of a champagne bottle. I got a new appreciation for the fragility of carboys that day, and have since treated them with a lot more care than I used to. Perhaps if the carboy isn't too cold when you pour in the hot wort you won't have a problem, but personally, I wouldn't risk the injury (or at least the resultant nasty mess). ============================================================================= Michael Owings Chief of Operations Uncle Leroi's Hazardous Materials Storage and FemtoBrewery New Orleans, LA ============================================================================= Return to table of contents
From: gameier at fmc.com (Gary A. Meier) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 09:47:22 -0500 Subject: Thermal expansion of glass Aaron Sepanski asked if thermal expansion of glass was enough of a problem that he should worry about cracking a carboy by adding hot liquid. Yes, you should worry about it. The stirring rod and glass cookware you mentioned are good examples of heat resistant glass, which undergoes relatively little thermal expansion when heated. Lab glassware such as Pyrex(tm) and Kimax(tm) are other examples of glass which may be safely heated. The problem is that carboys and many other glass vessels are made of less expensive "soft" glass, which expands much more when heated. In fact, it tends to expand so much that the vessel can only accommodate the expansion by breaking. Others have posted tales of breaking carboys by pouring hot wort into them, and the consensus seems to be that you really, really want to avoid doing this. Gary ************************************************************************** Gary Meier, Ph.D. Senior Research Computational Chemist FMC Corporation Agricultural Products Group phone: (609) 951-3448 Box 8 fax: (609) 951-3835 Princeton, NJ 08543 email: gameier at fmc.com Return to table of contents
From: George_De_Piro at berlex.com (George De Piro) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 10:41:38 -0700 Subject: Ester Formation w/ respect to aeration, etc. This thread is the best I've seen since subscribing... Anyhow, Andy Walsh asked for personal experiences in this area, so here are some: In my experience, I believe that ester production is definitely yeast-strain dependent. I have done split batches with Wyeast #3068 in an attempt to decrease the iso-amyl acetate (banana ester) that it kicks out (I like my Weizen more phenolic than fruity). Aeration with an aquarium pump for 1.5 hours vs. shaking the carboy for 5 minutes did not affect ester levels (according to my taste buds; I didn't use GC or HPLC). However, head retention was not very good in the underaerated batch (same wort). Anybody know why? Wyeast #1028 (London ale) cranks out esters (especially iso-amyl acetate) when underaerated, but is MUCH less fruity when aerated adequately at pitching (aquarium pump for 1 hour). George De Piro (Nyack, NY) Return to table of contents
From: "Decker, Robin E." <robind at rmtgvl.rmtinc.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 96 10:57:00 -0500 Subject: Re: Greenville Micro Scott Bridges asks: "Caesars Head (is that the name of the brewery, or just their brand name?)" Caesar's Head is the brand name for the Reedy River Brewing Co. in Greer, SC. It is located near the Greenville-Spartanburg Jetport. They are very friendly, so do include them on your field trip agenda. Also, while you are in Asheville, check out Barley's Tap Room (there's a microbrewery in their basement too!!). Barley's has a true pub atmosphere, their pizza's are great (single slices are huge), and they have all kinds of regional brews on tap. Its located in the heart of the Asheville shopping/ tourist district, and is very easy to find. Have fun! Goldings Return to table of contents
From: TMCASTLE at am.pnu.com Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 10:18:40 -0400 Subject: yeast starter I sent this about a week ago and haven't seen it posted, if it was I apologize for the redundancy. I may have screwed up the addressing. Again, I apologize for the redundancy if this was already posted and I screwed up the addressing. Hey, Four issues: (1) I usually add the contents of the swollen Wyeast smack-pack to a 1/2 gal with about 1 lb. of extra light DME to make my yeast starters. Well a batch or so back, I only had about half the DME I needed and rather than running out to the homebrew store (being the lazy bastard that I am) I startd rummaging through the cupboard for fermentables. Well, I found an unopened bottle of high fructose corn SYRUP (store brand) and added about 1/3 of it. I boiled it all, cooled it down and added the Wyeast American Ale II. Well, after about 3 days I had a brilliant deep burgandy colored beer (??!!). I haven't repeated this, but has anyone else ever heard of this. It seemes like a small amount might make a nice red hue. Though, is it fructose that makes a cidery taste? (2) Is adding a whole starter (without decanting off the fermented liquid) to the fermentation all that bad? Is it a gravity & volume issue or can you expect some wierd tastes from beer out of sync with the rest of the fermentation? (3) Did you know that one of Einstein's three Nobel Prizes was for developing the mathematics of Brownian Motion? I don't remmber the other two (I think one was the photoelectric effect) but NONE of them were for his theories of special or general relativity (his calling card). (4) In HBD#2061, Russell Mast lends his opinion to the question "when does ber become beer" by saying it is immediately before consumption. Actually that's close. It becomes beer during consumption. It does not exist as beer (or at least we have no evidence of it being beer) until we experience it fully. So, the sad part is that once it is down the tube it is beer but also ceases to beer as it joins with us. Beer and not beer together in a flash of time. There's a Zen Koan for the books. Ta, tom castle The Zen of Homebrewing http://www.netcom.com/~tmcastle Return to table of contents
From: "Gregory, Guy J." <GGRE461 at eroerm1.ecy.wa.gov> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 96 08:04:00 PDT Subject: Maximum draw for Gott cooler Gary Pelton <gap at cs.cmu.edu> asks: >I would like to calculate what the maximum draw rate should be for >my Gott cooler. However, I can't duplicate his calculations, because >I don't know what "the difference in head per unit length" means. >I've looked up "Hydraulic Gradient" in a couple of places, but haven't >been able to find an operational definition. The one definition I >found depended upon the velocity of the flow, which didn't seem right. >How do I calculate "i" given some pipe (lauter tun) geometry? Gary, hydraulic gradient is the slope of the hydraulic surface. Since water flows downhill, "head" is the elevation of the water surface, and unit length is measured between points where the elevation is measured. Obviously, in a static lautertun, there is no flow. When you open the valve, the surface in the lautertun and the elevation of the valve become the gradient. You can make some assumptions, or measure the lowest (and thus least fast) slope from the top of the sparge water to the valve, or you can use this equation: K=(QL)/(deltaHA) where: K=hydraulic conductivity Q=discharge from the outlet L=thichkess of grain deltaH=change in head from sparge water surface to outlet, basically the vertical distance from the surface of the water to the valve, A=Horizontal area of the grain, or pi(radius of gott cooler squared) You'll find that ...0.5 to 1 liter per minute flow (assuming you agree with my experiment and assumptions) is what works to maintain hydraulic continuity between the sparge water surface and the outlet valve, and thus not get stuck. My lauter tun is a 5 gal HDPE pail, and should have similar values for L, deltaH, and A. Hope this helps. Guy GuyG4 at aol.com Return to table of contents
From: VLIEG BRIAN S <vliegbri at hvcc.edu> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 96 11:34:26 EDT Subject: Homebrew and International Borders Thanks to all who's input has greatly improved my homebrewing. I have a question that some of you my have the answer to. I will be travelling from Upstate New York back home to Michigan this summer and would like to bring a case of homebrew for the folks. My concern in the US-Canadian borders in Buffalo, NY and Port Huron, MI. Is there any prohibition against transportation of homebrew or homemade across international borders? Many Thanks, Brian Return to table of contents
From: snsi at win.bright.net (Jeff Smith) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 10:37:12 -0500 (CDT) Subject: RE: Ominous moves Steve Rosenzweig wrote about the Quebec tax proposal: >I hope this doesn't give our US State and Federal weasels any bright > ideas! Seems like we may be playing right into their hands - sure, > we'll make it legal in every state - then they can tax it!!! Well Steve, I hate to burst your bubble but in Wisconsin beer and wine making supplies are taxed. This is probably where the Quebecois got the idea in the first place. Two years ago I mail ordered from a Beer store down south and noticed on my receipt that there was sales tax on it. Since I had bought only grain, malt extract and yeast I called about the "obvious" mistake. I talked to a clerk and explained that I only ordered food products and should have the tax refunded. I was tersely told that I was wrong and tough luck. Well still believing I was right I called the Department of Revenue (our states official weasels) and received a fax copy of "Section Tax 11.51 Wisconsin Administrative Code" which list "beer making supplies" and "wine making supplies" as taxable items. Of course I replied that this must apply only to equipment and not to food items. And of course I was told that any beer expendable is taxed. On this I did take solace in the fact that "Popcorn, raw or popped" and "Ginseng" are taxed to. I don't know where you live but maybe you should check your tax code too. Jeff Smith | '71 HD Sprint 350SX | snsi at win.bright.net | Barnes, WI "What the world needs now is another folk singer, like I need a hole in my head." Cracker Return to table of contents
From: "Palmer.John" <palmer at ssdgwy.mdc.com> Date: 14 Jun 1996 08:59:49 U Subject: Chlorine Dioxide Literature Hi Group, I have been slow getting back into the swing of things after the AHA Conf. in New Orleans, it was too much fun. Great meeting many of you, too. Pat asked my opinion on Chlorine Dioxide the other day and I didnt have one; so I looked it up in my ASM Handbook of Corrosion Data. Lo and behold, there it was. (Quote) Chlorine Dioxide: Chlorine Dioxide, ClO2 is a yellow-reddish gas. It is a very effective bleaching and water treatment agent. Chloride dioxide is prepared by the reaction of chlorine and sodium cholorite. It is quite unstable and is commonly prepared immmediately before use. (end quote) I will paraphrase the rest; At temperatures ranging from 36 - 150F, at concentrations ranging from 4 - 10% vol with strong aeration and rapid agitation in 304 Stainless Steels used at Pulp and Paper mills, it caused severe pitting over a two week period. But severe is defined as >.010 inch. BUT! This data is for the pure chemical for the conditions noted. It may be acceptable for short term use in combination with silicate buffers as the commercial product (Oxine?). I need more data on the commercial product to determine any risk of degradation to stainless. As a strong oxidizer, this chemical would not be suitable for use with Brass or Copper. Aluminum I am not sure about at this point. Hope this helps, John Palmer House Brewery and Smithy www.primenet.com/~johnj/ Metallurgist for the International Space Station palmer at ssdgwy.mdc.com Return to table of contents
From: herron at wadsworth.org (Bruce Herron) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 07:39:40 -0400 Subject: Beer Carbonation I have had batches where one beer comes out flat and the next is a gusher, and decided that I did a poor job of mixing the prining sugar before bottling. The gravity of 3/4 dextrose in 2 cups water is much higher than your fermented beer so it sinks to the bottom of your bottling bucket like syrup in water. Mix the hell out of your primed beer, without allowing oxidation. As for the rest of that batch, keep it in the corner of the cellar ans put it straight in the cooler before drinking. As a rule I try to leave beer in the secondary as much as two weeks after FG is reached rather than being a couple days early. Hope this helps. __ __ Bruce Herron / \ / \ Developmental Genetics ( _""_ ) David Axelrod Institute - o o - 120 New Scotland Ave. \ / Albany, NY 12208 ===\ /=== Phone (518) 474-3341 O FAX (518) 474-3181 Return to table of contents
From: herron at wadsworth.org (Bruce Herron) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 07:51:41 -0400 Subject: Re: yeast strains I would suspect, as most brewing strains are selected for their brewing characters that you could calculate a nice profile for each strain but the numbers would fall apart when you generalize this to an entire species. Biological systems tend to spit at numbers. __ __ Bruce Herron / \ / \ Developmental Genetics ( _""_ ) David Axelrod Institute - o o - 120 New Scotland Ave. \ / Albany, NY 12208 ===\ /=== Phone (518) 474-3341 O FAX (518) 474-3181 Return to table of contents
From: "Patrick G. Babcock" <pbabcock at ford.com> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 13:03:31 -0400 Subject: re:RE:rE:Re: Skunky beer Greetings, Beerlings! Take me to your lager... While Russell and Jim arm-wrestle in the corner over the half-full/half-fool issue, let me interject and say this: One can still *enjoy* a "defective" beer, though the same may not *satisfy* the drinker. The level of enjoyment has changed in that you *know* there is better to be had. That's all. Jim enjoys a defective beer to the level that his knowledge, experience and personality allow him to. Perhaps he enjoys pulling the defect out, recognizing it, and categorizing it. Nothing wrong with that, but he'd be more happy with something not having the defect. He enjoys it, yet he's not satisfied by it. Russ enjoys a defective beer to the level that his knowledge, experience and personality allow him to. That might be picking out the defect and mentally desensitizing himself to it - enjoying it for what's right, rather than what's wrong. Nothing wrong with that, either. Per the above, Russ' perspective is very similar to Jack's original premise which began this thread. He enjoys the *nostalgia* of what the rest of us would consider a defect. Again: nothing wrong with that! Enjoying beer is much like appreciating art or music. You may fully enjoy a piece, but it isn't quite what you had in mind - it just doesn't satisfy. Ask the person next to you and they point out all the nuances that please them. You find them seeing/hearing it very differently. Sometimes you're left envious of their perceptions; sometimes you're left thinking they're total losers. Whatever - but the perceptions in each case are a result of the knowledge, personalities, and experience of those involved. There are many different levels of enjoyment, but only one of those is true satisfaction. And this level is a direct result of (one more time...) one's knowledge, experience and personality - and it's different for each of us. So now - Can't we all... just... get along? See ya! Pat Babcock SE MI pbabcock at oeonline.com http://oeonline.com/~pbabcock/brew.html Copyright 1996 Wrigley's Spearmint Gum. All rights reserved by pure chewing satisfaction. (Though I find the Doublemint Twins more satisfying...) Return to table of contents
From: shawn at aob.org (Shawn Steele) Date: Fri, 14 Jun 96 11:10:17 MDT Subject: Re: Improved quality? > >From: denisb at CAM.ORG (Denis Barsalo) > >Date: Wed, 12 Jun 1996 23:32:12 -0500 > >Subject: Quality on the HBD > > > > Is it just me or have you noticed the improved quality of the > >posts on the HBD since it got moved to the AOB? What's going on, are > >we all on our best behaviour or something. I haven't seen any > >bad-mouthing, or silly ridiculous posts in over a week and a > >half...just intelligent, insightfull posts that have been a real > >pleasure to read. I've hardly had to page down! > > Keep it up people. > > Methinks Shawn has been doing some editing, perhaps????? > :) > > Scott Sorry, you're probably just on your best behavior <G> BTW: some Subject: lines have been coming along that have "Re: Homebrew.Digest.#xxxx" in them and I have to resubmit those manually and guess at what the poster's subject might be. If you respond to the Digest, please pick a subject :-) I think he's right, the quality of the posts does seem to have gone up recently, lets try to keep it that way. - - shawn Digest Janitor Return to table of contents
From: "Tracy Aquilla" <aquilla at salus.med.uvm.edu> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 96 13:57:47 CDT Subject: Re: join the esters thread! In Digest #2069: Andy Walsh <awalsh at crl.com.au> wrote: >I mistakenly attributed a quote of Tracy's to Greg Noonan, >about ester formation in an IPA that he made. ie. From >personal experience, Tracy has found that aeration continually >during the fermentation of an IPA produced high ester levels. >This was a somewhat surprising result as most texts would predict >the opposite, but was in fact, what Tracy was looking for, after >discussions with Greg Noonan. >Is this right now, Tracy? Correct, although my discussion with Greg came after making the beer. >One might also predict that such a beer would have high diacetyl >levels, and/or possess poor keeping qualities (oxidation). How did >the beer actually turn out? It's extremely fruity (apple and orange hints), noticeably alcoholic, and bitter, but I don't detect much diacetyl or ethyl acetate. Since I dry-hopped with about 4 oz. of EKGs (in 5 gallons), there is also a massive hop presence which may be masking the other flavors and aromas. It's only been in the bottle for a few months now, but so far it's holding up quite well (no obvious oxidation). In case you haven't guessed yet, I used Wyeast #1968-London ESB. >I am interested in the personal experience of other readers on >perceived ester levels in beers they have made, with or without >aeration during fermentation. I'm quite interested in this as well. If people do report their experiences, I'll be keeping tab of those reports. I think one critical bit of info to include would be the identity of the yeast strain used. Tracy Return to table of contents
From: bturnbaugh at kktv.com Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 12:11:42 -0500 Subject: Attention Rob, I am getting between 4 and 7 copies of the HD everyday. Would you please cut that back to once a day? :) Thanks Bob. - ------------------------------ Return to table of contents
From: Stetson <stetson at global2000.net> Date: Fri, 14 Jun 1996 15:47:48 -0400 (EDT) Subject: pilsner Hello, I brewed a pilsner, not a lager, and its been in the bottle for about 6 to 7 weeks now. When you first start drinking one, it has a dusty taste to it, and after a while, it goes away. Its not real overwhelming, but was wondering if anybody had any suggestions on why it tastes like this? My sanitising and brewing process was no different than any other time. Thanks, and happy brewing! stetson at global2000.net Return to table of contents