Homebrew Digest Friday, 27 September 1996 Number 2207

[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]


   FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
        Mike Donald, Digest Janitor-in-training
        Thanks to Rob Gardner for making the digest happen!

Contents:
  Noonan (RUSt1d?)
  Unlurking/Xmas Spices/Curacao/Longshot Ripoffs (Rob Kienle)
  Foreign brewers and beer labeling (Dale Smith)
  GABF Members Only Tickets (Jim Thomas)
  Melanoidins, Decoction Mashing, and extracts ((Brian Pickerill))
  Counter Pressure Filler - Recap (no pun intended) (Gary Eckhardt)
  Beck's Oktoberfest (Aaron Sepanski)
  malts/contract "imports" (korz at xnet.com)
  motor loading (Larry Johnson)
  grains ("Bryan L. Gros")
  Hmmm. Plastic carboy? ("David E. Bentz")
  Honey ("W. Scott Snyder")
  malts ((BAYEROSPACE))
  Spelt ((John W. Braue, III))
  CAMRA Book "Brew Your Own Real Ale At Home" (Jeff Hewit)
  Counter Pressure Bottle Filler (greg at chtree.com)
  Too much moss?? ("Bateman, M.D.")
  URL for PSC brewing stuff?? ((Robert Marshall))
  Triticum spelta ((Torbjorn Bull-Njaa))
  Cut off from the HBD (AJN)
  Re: Hmmm. Plastic carboy? (Geoff Bagley)
  Saranac FallFest Results (tgaskell at syr.lmco.com)
  yeast propagation/enamel pots (Robert DeNeefe)
  Software (Alex Banta)

For SUBMISSIONS to be published, send mail to: homebrew at aob.org For (UN)SUBSCRIBE requests, send mail to: homebrew-digest-request@ aob.org and include ONLY subscribe or unsubscribe in the BODY of the message. Please note that if subscribed via BEER-L, you must unsubscribe by sending a one line e-mail to listserv at ua1vm.ua.edu that says: UNSUB BEER-L If your address is changing, please unsubscribe from the old address and then subscribe from the new address. If your account is being deleted, please be courteous and unsubscribe first. For technical problems send e-mail to the Digest Janitor, homebrew-digest-owner at aob.org. OTHER HOMEBREW INFORMATION http://www.aob.org/aob - The AHA's web site. http://alpha.rollanet.org - "The Brewery" and the Cat's Meow Archives. info at aob.org - automated e-mail homebrewing information. ARCHIVES: At ftp.stanford.edu in /pub/clubs/homebrew/beer via anonymous ftp. Also http://alpha.rollanet.org on the web and at majordomo at aob.org by e-mail. COPYRIGHT: As with all forums such as this one, copyrights are retained by the original authors. In accordance with the wishes of the members of the Homebrew Digest, posts to the HBD may NOT be sold or used as part of a collection that is sold without the original authors' consent. Copies may ONLY be made available at no charge and should include the current posting and subscription addresses for the HBD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: RUSt1d? <rust1d at li.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 96 12:49:21 -0700 Subject: Noonan At Stoudts Festival last weekend I had an IPA from the Seven Barrel Brewery that was wonderful. It tasted like an improved Sierra Nevada Pale Ale and screamed Cascades. Next to the serving station they had an index card with the following written down (which I took!): Pale Perle (2/3) Cara Cascades (1/3) Crystal (5%) Wheat (2%) Dry Hop with 1.5 oz Cascade/gal O.G. 1052 IBU's : 62 F.G. 1016 My question on this is the 1.5 oz Cascades for every gallon. This seems a little much? (Why not fill your mouth with cascades and drink a beer through them. Kinda like a hop back in your mouth). Can anyone tell me more about this beer and it's formulation? It was nectar, a well hopped ambroisa! Way to go Greg. - -- John Varady Boneyard Brewing Co. "Ale today, Gone tomorrow" Return to table of contents
From: Rob Kienle <rkienle at interaccess.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:53:16 -0500 Subject: Unlurking/Xmas Spices/Curacao/Longshot Ripoffs Greetings, all! So I guess it=92s time to stop lurking as I=92ve both a question and a bo= ne of contention that=92s been rising in my throat like so much overcarbonated Pilsner.... First the question; I=92ve read that the use of orange peel as an additiv= e to a beer such as an Xmas ale is undesirable because it tends to diminish head retention. The alternative, I recall, is to use a hit of orange curacao instead. I can=92t remember, however, how much liquor to use or when to add it to the beer. I assume during the secondary if not just prior to bottling/kegging would be the best times? Though in practice I have not found the addition of orange peel to affect head retention to any noticeable degree (I=92ve been making an Xmas spiced ale for three years running at least), I have noticed the orange flavor isn=92t coming through (though the mutual inclusion of cinnamon, honey, and ginger may have something more to do with it) and am considering the use of the liquor instead in order to get that tinge of orange flavor (it=92s also a pain to grate all that orange zest!).=20 Now my bone of contention. There=92s been a lot of discussion surrounding Sam Adams=92 Longshot competition and I think it=92s noteworthy that any homebrewer would be fortunate and talented enough to have his/her recipe be commemorated by being taken to market by a microbrewer (and I use the term loosely here with regard to SA). However, my own background is in advertising and marketing and I have to point out to anyone out there seriously considering =93giving away=94 their hard-earned recipes that =93giving it away=94 may be a generous term to describe their participati= on. You basically are giving SA a marketable product and (most important of all, since I=92m sure SA has no trouble putting together a new recipe) an interesting marketing =93hook=94 (a brilliant one, in fact, as they=92re capitalizing on the entrepreneurial instinct in all of us) that will surely translate into many dollars of sales and profit for SA. In return, you get a tee-shirt and a trip. Now is it just me or is there something wrong with this picture?=20 Prosit! *********************************************** Rob Kienle=20 rkienle at interaccess.com Chicago, IL =93A rolling stone gathers no moss.=94 --Publius Syrus, 42 B.C. =93Running beer gathers no foam.=94 --Victor Hugo, 1862 *********************************************** Return to table of contents
From: Dale Smith <des at io.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 11:48:43 -0500 Subject: Foreign brewers and beer labeling Jeff wrote >From what I have been able to gather, beer is labeled according to >alcohol content so that anything with 6% alcohol or less must be >labeled Beer and anything above 6% must be labeled Malt Liquor. I don't know about Wyoming but In Texas the magic number is 4%. Cleis brews there golden, and bock to be 3.9 for just this reason. Most domestics are in the 3.5 to 3.9 range. Most lights are 3.0 to 3.5. Those ice beers are 5.0 for light and 5.5 to 6% for regular ice. If you look closely you will notice that nowhere on the can does ice beer say "beer". Not that it matters much. As for foreign brewers brewing over here, there are only a few that I'm aware of. The US has trade agreements with Canada and therefore we brew theirs and they brew ours. Molsen, Labbat and spring brew Bud, Miller and Coors up there. We do the same down here. Lowenbrough (sp? ) is brewed in Fort Worth. I doubt seriously if you'll find a Fullers or Guinness brewed over here. Most imports say "imported by xxxx" unless they are contract brewed over here. Speaking of Celis, anyone tried the new CELIS DUBBEL ALE. Very nice! Really warms you up. I toured the brewery a couple of weeks ago and was amazed to find that they used basically the same ingredients that we home brewers use. Breiss malt, hop pellets and plain old Austin tap water. Just goes to show you don't it. Dale Return to table of contents
From: Jim Thomas <jim.thomas at telops.gte.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:39:30 -0500 Subject: GABF Members Only Tickets For the collective: Anybody know if "members only tasting" tickets will be available at the door on Saturday?? TIA, Jim Return to table of contents
From: 00bkpickeril at bsuvc.bsu.edu (Brian Pickerill) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 14:41:49 -0500 (EST) Subject: Melanoidins, Decoction Mashing, and extracts George De Piro recentely wrote: > Some malting methods and decoction mashing favor the formation of > melanoidins. That's why it's important to decoction mash Munich > lagers: just having high residual sweetness does NOT make the beer > malty; it just makes it sweet. You must have melanoidins to get malt > flavor. Which makes me wonder: Is any of the DME or LME on the market decoction mashed, and would it make any difference? TIA, - --Brian Pickerill, Muncie, IN <00bkpickeril at mail.bsu.edu> Return to table of contents
From: Gary Eckhardt <gary_eckhardt at realworld.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 14:42:44 -0500 Subject: Counter Pressure Filler - Recap (no pun intended) Since I was asked, I'm posting the variety of responses I got on my question about the correct use of a Counter Pressure Bottle Filler. It looks like my problem was temperature. I haven't had the time to chill the beer colder and try again, but I will this weekend! Posted below is a summary of responses I received via e-mail. Thanks to all who responded! I must admit, for a first time poster to the list, I am impressed with the friendly response I got to this question. I've found a home! ;^> Original Posting: - ----------------- >I recently bought a counter-pressure bottle filler, and I guess I'm doing >something wrong, as all my beer is FLAT when I try it out the next day. > >The instructions that came with it were rather vague, so I was wondering >if anyone had any ideas on the correct operation of it. I have a "three-handed" model, meaning it has the needle pressure release valve >as well. > >Here's the operation procedure I used in a nutshell: > >1) Adjust CO2 tank to 10-15psi. >2) Put filler in sanitized bottle. >3) Open CO2 valve, then open needle valve to flush bottle with CO2. >4) Close needle valve and CO2 valve. >5) Open Beer valve. Beer should not be flowing. >6) Open needle valve to start beer flowing and adjust to stop foaming. >7) When bottle filled, close needle valve, and close beer valve. >8) Take filler out of bottle and cap. > >Using the above procedure, I end up with flat beer. My kegs are usually kept >at 20-25psi and if I draw off beer directly from the keg, the carbonation >level seems fine. The beer was not as cold as it should have been (~50f) > >Any help, suggestions?? > >Thanks. Response 1: - ----------- >0) boost keg pressure to 30psi a day or two before filling >.5) Chill keg, bottles, filler to 32f. >.75) bleed off excess co0 > >> 1) Adjust CO2 tank to 10-15psi. >I use 5-10. I found that too much pressure will knockout some co2 >during bottling. Response 2: - ----------- >Sounds like what I do. If you only put 15 psi in the bottle and you have 25 >psi in the keg, you'll get beer flowing into the bottle (step 5). You need >to equate these pressures. And seems like 25 is a bit high for the keg >pressure, especially if you serve the beer warm (55F). > >What happens when you take the filler off the bottle? I get a big pfffft >sound and some foaming, but not much. I cap and next day, carbonated beer. > >I got almost no foaming when I had the beer real cold and the bottles cold. >Things worked great, but I dont' think things are much worse when the >bottles are room temp. Response 3: - ----------- >When CP-filling, I find it is important to get the beer as cold as >possible to minimize foaming and out-gassing. Response 4: - ----------- >Your procedure sounds fine. It is the same as I usually use. The big key >is to have your beer cold - as close to 32F as possible. There is a major >difference between 32F and 35F in the behavior of the CO2. I also >wonder about the accuracy of your regulator. If your regulator is set at >25 psi and the beer is not 4/5 foam, I think it is reading incorrectly. My >beer is kept at 10 to 12 psi and it is fully carbonated. When I am going to >counter pressure fill, I adjust the regulator up to 20 psi to give it a little >extra CO2 to compensate for the inevitable losses in filling. > >I would be interested in reading a summary of the responses you get to >your query in HBD. Response 5: - ----------- >Maybe you are not maintaining pressure on the bottle before you fill it. >You might want to check out this web page: > >http://www.foamrangers.com/filler.html > >It was put together by the webmaster of my homebrew club, the Houston >Foam Rangers. It explains the operation of a counterpressure filler. > >Good luck! - ---------------------------+---------------------------------------------- Gary Eckhardt | "in this day & age...music performed by Database Consultants, Inc. | humans...hum!?" --wilde silas tomkyn dcigary at txdirect.net | R,DW,HAHB! gary_eckhardt at realworld.com| R^3 = "Real World. Real Smart. Real Quick." (210)344-6566 | http://www.realworld.com/ Return to table of contents
From: Aaron Sepanski <sepanska at it.uwp.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 15:17:17 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Beck's Oktoberfest One gentleman published that he had recently tried Beck's Oktoberfest and said it was skunky. This is really curious to me because I had the same experience THIS year. The Beck's of last year I thought was much better. I also noticed the skunky scent/flavor. I was just dissapointing that's all. Last year I think that it was much better. Does this sound familiar to anyone else? I'm sure the problem is in the distribution of the beer, not in the making. Return to table of contents
From: korz at xnet.com Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 15:43:38 -0500 Subject: malts/contract "imports" Curt writes: Breiss, Harrington, Hugh Baird, Maris Otter and other pale malts?? Breiss and Hugh Baird are maltsters. Harrington, Maris Otter (as well as Klages and Triumph) are strains of barley. Breiss makes their 2-row from Harrington as do most US maltsters. Every few years the farmers change strains when a strains disease-resistance fades. In the Midwest they changed from Klages to Harrington a few years ago. In the West, they are part-way through the change. There are perhaps five or six more 2-row strains grown in the US, but Harrington (I'm told) is the most common. Hugh Baird (I've read) is made from Maris Otter. Maris Otter is supposedly one of the very best malts. Other maltsters that use Maris Otter are Crisp Maltings and Beeston. I have only used several pale malts to the point where I feel I could give an opinion on them: DeWolf-Cosyns (DWC), Munton & Fison and Schreier. I've used Munich malts from Ireks and DWC and thought they were both great and quite comparable. Of the three Pale Ale malts I've used a lot of, the Schreier is the cleanest (which can be a positive or a negative, depending on what you are trying to make). M&F has the most caramel and melanoidin flavours of the three. You can actually make a decent Bitter with 100% M&F Pale. Forget it with the DWC and Schreier. They both need at least 10% crystal malt to make a proper Bitter. So, in my opinion, all three of these malts are excellent quality and differ in flavour significantly. Incidentaly, Schreier doesn't make a "Pils" and a "Pale ale" malt... they make one pale malt "Brewer's 2-row" which seems more like a Pils than a Pale Ale malt to me. *** SM writes (in response to AJ's comment on foreign beers brewed in the US under contract): >Would it be safe to say that the domestically produced version would >use a similar recipe, but local grains? Nope. Two that immediately come to mind are Loewenbrau (Miller) and Andechs (Huber). I've had both here and in Germany and neither are anything even close to the original. I have tasted Budweiser in London and it tasted about the same as it does here. On the other hand, the Miller I tasted in Canada was much better than it is here in the US. I have also compared (side-by-side) the Labatt's Blue in Canada with the import version. The difference was far greater than could be due to the stresses of shipment. Different recipes, I'm quite sure. As for floating grains versus beer, remember that you are importing water too when you ship beer. It would be much more economical to ship grains and hops and use local water than to ship beer, but you're probably right, they probably do use local grains. Al. Al Korzonas, Palos Hills, IL korz at xnet.com Return to table of contents
From: Larry Johnson <Maltster at ix.netcom.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 13:49:39 -0700 Subject: motor loading Bob Sutton says, in HBD #2201 >Let me caution that before anyone just slaps a controller on their >existing pump, they should confirm that the pump can operate continuously >at reduced speed. Most motors rely on self induced fan cooling. When the >rotational speed id reduced, fan speed is reduced, cooling is reduced, and >at some point the motor will overheat. Generally if the motor HP rating is >well above the required load, a reduced fan speed will still provide sufficient >cooling. When in doubt, check with the motor supplier. Generally true, with a couple of comments: 1. Since centrifugal pumps are non-linear loads, the loading increases exponentially with speed. This means that at 50% speed, the load is less than 50% of the load at 100% speed. (Got that?) At 25% the load is less than 50% of the load at 50% speed, and on and on, exponentially. Therefore, there is some relief to the amperage (and therefore the heating) because of the load characteristics. 2. The above is some help, but is much improved upon if the controller that is used to power the motor is one that not only varies both voltage *and* frequency (a light dimmer only varies the voltage), but is also capable of producing a non-linear voltage curve that corresponds to the non-linear torque curve mentioned in (1.) above. This curve is known as a "variable torque load profile" and many AC motor controllers are configurable for that type of output. 3. This may all be completely irrelevant, since I have no idea if there are AC motor controllers like this for motors as small as the ones you're using in your RIMS systems. I am only familiar with what's available in the 1/4 to 1200 horsepower range. Come get me, Mom; I'm through........... Larry Johnson / Athens, GA / Maltster at ix.netcom.com Return to table of contents
From: "Bryan L. Gros" <grosbl at ctrvax.Vanderbilt.Edu> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 15:54:30 -0500 (CDT) Subject: grains Tom Castle writes: > I've seen DeWolf-Cosyns Pale Ale Malt and Pils Malt in the catalogs. > Oh, Grain Gurus, what are the differences in these grains and what > are the different characteristics typically associated with each? Well, it kind of correlates with the differences between pale ales and pilseners. Pale ale malt has lower protein, lower enzymes (diastatic power), and higher color. It will make a darker beer than the pils malt. It is good for single infusion mashes, however, due to the low protein. The pils malt will make a paler beer. A protein rest is often recommended. It has more enzymes, though, so it is good to use this malt if you are adding adjuncts, like in a belgian wit beer. This is one topic that is rarely addressed in the literature. Good to know, though, for the beer judging exam! Hope this helps. - Bryan grosbl at ctrvax.vanderbilt.edu Nashville, TN Return to table of contents
From: "David E. Bentz" <dbentz at pen.k12.va.us> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 96 18:13:22 EDT Subject: Hmmm. Plastic carboy? Help! I'm just getting started. Any problems using a plastic carboy (5 gallon water jug) as a secondary fermenter? If a food grade 5 gal. bucket is O.K., why not this? - -- *************************************************************************** Dave Bentz Turner Ashby High School 800 N. Main St. Bridgewater, VA 22812 (W) (540) 828-2008 *************************************************************************** Return to table of contents
From: "W. Scott Snyder" <w-snyder at students.uiuc.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 17:37:15 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Honey Greetings all! Was wondering if anyone had any experience with using Honey in their brews. I'd like try to work up some type of Honey Ale (ala J.W. Dundee) but am at a loss as to how much honey to use and what affect it will have on overall character and alcohol content. I am an extract brewer (grad student = no money, no space and no time) so if you can keep any recipie suggestions within that framework, I'd appreciate it! Thanks! Relax, don't worry, have a homebrew. -Scott ______________________________________________________ _________| | |_________ \ | W. Scott Snyder | Ask not whether you believe in | / \ | "Cosmo" | Dragons, but rather, whether | / \ | | Dragons believe in you... | / \ |------------------------------------------------------| / / | E-MAIL - w-snyder at uiuc.edu | \ / | URL - http://www.students.uiuc.edu/~w-snyder/ | \ / |______________________________________________________| \ /____________) (___________\ Return to table of contents
From: M257876 at sl1001.mdc.com (BAYEROSPACE) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 18:27 -0600 Subject: malts collective homebrew conscience: tom castle asked: > I've seen DeWolf-Cosyns Pale Ale Malt and Pils Malt in the catalogs. > Oh, Grain Gurus, what are the differences in these grains and what > are the different characteristics typically associated with each? pale ale malt is slightly higher kilned. the kilning reduces the available enzymes for mashing compared to pils malt, but there are still plenty to mash and convert a reasonable amount of adjuncts. the flavor of ale malt is partway in between pils and vienna malt, in my opinion. some very light vienna malts taste a lot like pale ale malt. the kilning also increases the color of the beer in pale ale malt, as compared with pils. there may be a slightly lower pH at mash-in using pale ale malt as well, but i've never experimented with this (and probably don't have accurate enough pH measurement capability). pale ale malt has very low (if any) levels of the compounds which form dimethyl sulfide in a slowly cooled wort; pils malt has plenty of these precursors, and dms will be quite evident in the finished product of a slowly cooled wort made from pils malt. schreier malting will send you a copy of a malt analysis for all the malts they carry, including dewolf cosyns. much of the information about color, enzyme content, etc. is in the malt analysis. dave wrote: >I'd like to experiment with making a very low alcohol mild using as a >base Laaglander extract, but building the body and maltiness using a >specialty grain such as Belgian Aromatic<snip>I've not used Aromatic before >and I'm concerned that it will further increase the sweetness, >Which of the various specialty malts are noted for adding character >without adding much sweetness? first off, if you use aromatic malt, you really should be mashing it. i believe you can use aromatic and mash it at a low saccarification temp., around 150 deg. F, and it really won't contribute much sweetness, however, aromatic malt is very low in enzymes and you must be careful not too overshoot the temperature. otherwise you may decimate the enzyme population to the extent that it does not convert all the available starch. in this case, you would end up with a starch haze and food for bacteria in the finished beer. you may want to add a small amount of pale lager malt to avoid this situation. generally, the crystal-type malts are the specialty malts that will really contribute a lot of unfermentable sugars and sweetness. if you're doing a partial mash (as with aromatic), you control the sweetness/dryness balance with the mash temperature. chocolate and heavily roasted malts/barley contribute a darker "roasted" type flavor that's really not sweet like the crystal malts are. brew hard, mark bayer Return to table of contents
From: braue at ratsnest.win.net (John W. Braue, III) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 19:56:24 Subject: Spelt Charles Capwell <chas at A119018.sat1.as.crl.com> asks: >Whilst looking around a chain supermarketish health/new age store(Whole >Foods) here in San Antonio, I spied something called 'Flaked Spelt'(right >next to the $.89/lb Flaked Barley) and I started wondering what the heck >'spelt' was and what kind of effects it might have as an adjunct. If anyone >knows I'd appreciate your sharing of knowledge. :> > Spelt is a hardy species of wheat (genus Triticum) mostly seen in Europe (although, as your evidence indicates, it's making its way across the pond). I don't know what it does as an adjunct, but, in the absence of hands-on knowledge, I'd advise treating it as a normal hard wheat. - -- John W. Braue, III braue at ratsnest.win.net jbraue9522 at aol.com I've decided that I must be the Messiah; people expect me to work miracles, and when I don't, I get crucified. Return to table of contents
From: Jeff Hewit <jhewit at erols.com> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 21:52:01 -0400 (EDT) Subject: CAMRA Book "Brew Your Own Real Ale At Home" Alex Santic indicatd that he was going to contact CAMRA (in England, I guess) to see about getting a copy of their book "Brew Your Own Real Ale At Home." This book is already available in the good old US of A. I purchased my copy through mail order from a homebrewer supplier - I forget who. I have seen it listed in the catalogs of a number of the major suppliers. It might even be available as a special order from a bookstore. No need to go directly to England for a copy - unless one were to go in person, or course. - ---------------------------------- Jeff Hewit - Midlothian, Virginia Return to table of contents
From: greg at chtree.com Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 20:13:43 -0700 Subject: Counter Pressure Bottle Filler My local brewstore sells a counter pressure bottle filler for $35. How do these work? How well do they work? I'd rather build one than buy one, so I'd love to hear any construction ideas. Thanks. Return to table of contents
From: "Bateman, M.D." <batemanm at email.uah.edu> Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 23:27:09 -0500 (CDT) Subject: Too much moss?? Has anyone ever used more than 1 tbsp of irish moss? If so, can you describe the flavor that it caused? I'm still trying to track down an off flavor from a batch that I brewed and I have narrowed it down to either an over use of irish moss or leaving the beer in the sun light for two weeks during the fermenting process. What happened: I was following a stout recipe and it called for irish moss. It did not say when to add the irish moss, so I added it at the same time as I added a portion of my hops (40 minutes before finishing.) I added the amount which was supplied to me (probably a lot more than 1 tbsp). The result: A very strange tasting beer. The best description of the beer came from a friend who said it tasted like a "soured tea." The beer has a strong bitter taste and it exceptionally thick and probably really clear. After four days of furious fermentation, I changed the beer to a glass carboy and had probably one and one half gallons of mush at the bottom of the primary bucket. When I bottled, I had probably one and one half gallons or more of mush at the bottom of the carboy. Each bottle has a good deal of settlement in them. It is undrinkable at the present time. Although over the past month it has somewhat settled down but not near enough to be drinkable. The beer is only a month old. I was wondering if there was something that I could do with this bad batch...if it doesn't settle out in the near future. {Not wanting to waste any of it if it can be helped.} Michael D. Bateman batemanm at email.uah.edu Return to table of contents
From: robertjm at hooked.net (Robert Marshall) Date: Thu, 26 Sep 1996 05:13:32 GMT Subject: URL for PSC brewing stuff?? A few days ago I saw a web page for a company called PSC (I don't remember what it stood for). One of the things that caught my eye was a brewing stove which allows use of natural gas. Now, when I try to find the page, I cannot. Does anyone know the company I'm talking about? Also, could you forward the page URL on to me? Thanks in advance, Robert Marshall robertjm at hooked.net homepage: http://www.hooked.net/users/robertjm - ---------------------------------------------- "In Belgium, the magistrate has the dignity of a prince but by Bacchus, it is true that the brewer is king." Emile Verhaeren (1855-1916) Flemish writer - ----------------------------------------------- Return to table of contents
From: tbn at merkur.sds.no (Torbjorn Bull-Njaa) Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 09:53:51 +0200 Subject: Triticum spelta Charles Capwell asks what "spelt" is. Triticum spelta is an old wheat version, I did not know it was commercially produced since the Middle Ages. Other wheats are emmer/triticum dicoccum and durum/triticum durum. The wheat we use for brewing (and bread!) is triticum aestivum or varieties of this. Torbj=F8rn Bull-Njaa Return to table of contents
From: AJN <neitzkea at frc.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 06:09:33 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Cut off from the HBD If anyone out there is reading this, please, please reply to me via private e-mail at neitzkea at frc.com. I seam to be cut off from the HBD and haven't seen a post in over a week! I need to know if there is something wrong with my end, or the AOB end. Sorry for the waste of bandwidth, but I miss the HBD. (sob sob) _________________________________________________________________________ Arnold J. Neitzke Internet Mail: neitzkea at frc.com Return to table of contents
From: Geoff Bagley <geoff at gcbagley.demon.co.uk> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 08:55:29 +0100 Subject: Re: Hmmm. Plastic carboy? In message <199609262213.SAA85222 at pen2.pen.k12.va.us>, Homebrew Digest REQUEST Address Only <homebrew-request@ aob.org> writes >Help! I'm just getting started. Any problems using a plastic >carboy (5 gallon water jug) as a secondary fermenter? If a >food grade 5 gal. bucket is O.K., why not this? No problem if the plastic is the right kind. Over here we use plastic vessels for mashing, plastic boilers ("Bruheat"), plastic fermenters, and plastic barrels (5 gals) for the finished beer. RTegards, Geoff Bagley Return to table of contents
From: tgaskell at syr.lmco.com Date: Fri, 27 Sep 96 08:06:08 EDT Subject: Saranac FallFest Results Saranac Fall Fest Results The brewing season has begun in the Empire State! The following are the results of the 1996 Saranac Fall Fest Homebrew Competition which was held Saturday, September 21 at the F.X. Matt Brewing Company in Utica, N.Y. All proceeds benefit the United Way of Central New York. Entries accepted from New York State Homebrewers. Total Entries: 114 Categories: 12 Club Style Best of Show Paul Krebs STB Framboise Amber and Dark Ales Manny Holl HVH Traditional Bock Rich Mueller MVFOB Vienna Manny Holl HVH Oktoberfest Belgian and French Paul Krebs STB Framboise Paul Krebs STB Trippel Peter Garofalo SCBC White (Wit) English and American Ales Manny Holl HVH India Pale Ale Phil Milano MUGGZ Classic English Pale Ale Michael Maimone American Pale Ale Fruit & Herb Beers Tom Gaskell MVFOB Raspberry Porter Chris Russell Citrus Wheat Eric Schauber HVH Cranberry Ale Light Lagers Phillip Mitchell ABC Dortmunder/European Export Phillip Mitchell ABC German Pilsener Rich Rucigay STB Dortmunder/European Export Meads and Ciders Dennis Everett SCBC Sparkling Metheglin Dennis Everett SCBC Still Cyser Phil Milano MUGGZ Strawberry Mead Miscellaneous Ales Peter Garofalo SCBC American Brown Chris Russell Kolsch John Thibodeau MUGGZ American Brown Porters Tony Kattato MVFOB Porter Anthony Becampis HVH Porter Chip Quayle MVFOB Porter Specialty Beers Steve Sammons MVFOB Brown w/ Molasses Ray Adams MVFOB Black and Tan Mike Maimone Maple Porter Stouts John Barnes SCBC Imperial Stout Manny Holl HVH Sweet Stout Rich Rucigay STB Foreign Style Stout Strong Ales Bob Ehlers Scottish Light Ale Manny Holl HVH English Old/Strong Ale Lyn Howard HVH Scottish Export Ale Wheat Beers Eric Schauber HVH Weizen/Weissbier Peter Garofalo SCBC Weizen/Weissbier John Barnes SCBC Weizen/Weissbier Special Categories Winners were selected from entries in the Tastes Like Saranac categories by the Tasting Panel from the F.X. Matt Brewing Co. Tastes Like Saranac Amber Ray Adams MVFOB Classic Style Specialty Beer Tastes Like Saranac Golden Peter Garofalo SCBC German Pilsener Tastes Like Saranac Pale Ale Phil Milano MUGGZ Classic English Pale Ale Tastes Like Saranac Black and Tan Lee J. Turner SCBC Porter Tastes Like Saranac Wild Berry Wheat Ray Adams MVFOB Specialty Beer Key to Clubs: ABC Albany Barley Converters HVH Hudson Valley Homebrewers (Hyde Park) MVFOB Mohawk Valley Friends of Beer (Utica) MUGGZ Mutually United Grape and Grain Zymurgists (Schenectady) SCBC Salt City Brew Club (Syracuse) STB Saratoga Thoroughbrews Special thanks to the F.X. Matt Brewing Company, brewers of Saranac, for their help in making this event happen. I also want to publicly thank these incredible folks: Tricia Hogan, Saranac Tour Center Chip Quayle, MVFOB, Registrar Rich Mueller, MVFOB, Chief Steward Jim Kuhr, MVFOB, Head Judge Tom Gaskell Organizer 1996 Saranac Fall Fest Competition Return to table of contents
From: Robert DeNeefe <rdeneefe at compassnet.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 1996 07:52:26 -0500 Subject: yeast propagation/enamel pots In an effort to make a Wyeast packet go further than one batch, I dumped 1 lb. of DME into a gallon of water, boiled it, cooled it, put it into my primary, aerated it, and then poured in a swelled packet of #1056. I plan to let it ferment out and then bottle and refrigerate it. Then I'll make a starter from a bottle when I need to and off we go. I may have made one mistake though. I didn't remove the hot/cold break from the boiled wort, and there seems to be a lot of gunk at the bottom of my fermenter. Will this lessen the life of my little yeast bottles? Will this, re-pitched into my next batch, cause weird flavors? Will Veronica find happiness with her boyfriend's ex-boss's lovechild Waldo? Tune in tomorr...oops, sorry. Second question: Does anyone use enamel on steel pots over a propane cooker (ring burner) for boiling their wort? I am collecting the necessities for all-grain, and large enamel on steel pots are certainly priced right (for me anyway). Is a propane cooker too "strong" for them (ie. do I need a heavy duty pot)? Lastly, thanks for being so kind in answering my previous questions. In regards to my last question about a dirty copper immersion chiller, I tried scrubbing it to no avail. So I used some copper cleaner on it and it's now bright and shiny. If it's good enough for copper pots, it's got to be good enough for my chiller! Robert Return to table of contents
From: Alex Banta <abanta at sctcorp.com> Date: Fri, 27 Sep 96 10:42:58 EDT Subject: Software Hello Fellow Homebrewers, I was recently given an old IBM 286 machine. Does anybody know of any homebrew type software that might be compatible for this "old" machine? Everything I have seen so far is for Windows 3.1 or Windows 95. I know there must be something. Homebrewing has been around for a long time, at least as long as this computer anyway. Any suggestions? Email me privately at abanta at sctcorp.com. Thanks in advance for any ideas that you all may have. Happy Brewing! Alex R. Banta Programmer Analyst, BANNER Finance SCT Government Systems Lexington, KY 40504 VOICE 277-1500 x 364 INTERNET abanta at sctcorp.com Return to table of contents