Homebrew Digest Friday, 1 November 1996 Number 2258

[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]


   FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
        Mike Donald, Digest Janitor-in-training
        Thanks to Rob Gardner for making the digest happen!

Contents:
  HBD ((Bill Giffin))
  RE: Dreaded DMS ((Bill Giffin))
  Why Lager's ? (Anton Schoenbacher)
  More counter (flow) arguments (Wade Hutchison)
  hot mash ... (John Wilkinson)
  Keg sediment (Mike Donald)
  re:Sparge Necessary? (Charles Burns)
  Chillers, 2-tier systems, etc. ("Tom Kelly")
  Re: Ouch! How bad is it? (RUSt1d?)
  Atlanta brewpubs (<egross at emory.edu>)
  Re: Ouch! How bad is it? (David Hammond)
  Primary Dry Hopping (Nathan Moore)
  Thermometer Expert products... anyone tried them? (Dave Riedel)
  Zima Type brew (chris)
  Wild Goose (chris)
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  immersion chiller construction question (William D Gladden )
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  Temp diff in chillers:  co- vs. counter-flow ((David C. Harsh))
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  What Comes Around ("David Kennedy")
  XMAS BREW (<ROTH.TER at SEATTLE.VA.GOV>)
  Re: Keg sediment ("William E. Steimle")
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  [none] ()
  Re: zima wife ((Wouter de Waal))
  re: Dreaded DMS ((Bill Giffin))
  Altenmunoter Brauer Bier (Steven Ketcham)
  Recipe for a German Wheat Double Bock ("Kevin M. McAnulty, PE")
  Re: Ouch! How bad is it? (David Hammond)
  Re: Chiller sanitation ((Jay Reeves))
  HBD #2253 not MIA (D1FKV0W at BATLAN.BELL-ATL.COM)

For SUBMISSIONS to be published, send mail to: homebrew at aob.org For (UN)SUBSCRIBE requests, send mail to: homebrew-digest-request@ aob.org and include ONLY subscribe or unsubscribe in the BODY of the message. Please note that if subscribed via BEER-L, you must unsubscribe by sending a one line e-mail to listserv at ua1vm.ua.edu that says: UNSUB BEER-L If your address is changing, please unsubscribe from the old address and then subscribe from the new address. If your account is being deleted, please be courteous and unsubscribe first. For technical problems send e-mail to the Digest Janitor, homebrew-digest-owner at aob.org. OTHER HOMEBREW INFORMATION http://www.aob.org/aob - The AHA's web site. http://alpha.rollanet.org - "The Brewery" and the Cat's Meow Archives. info at aob.org - automated e-mail homebrewing information. ARCHIVES: At ftp.stanford.edu in /pub/clubs/homebrew/beer via anonymous ftp. Also http://alpha.rollanet.org on the web and at majordomo at aob.org by e-mail. COPYRIGHT: As with all forums such as this one, copyrights are retained by the original authors. In accordance with the wishes of the members of the Homebrew Digest, posts to the HBD may NOT be sold or used as part of a collection that is sold without the original authors' consent. Copies may ONLY be made available at no charge and should include the current posting and subscription addresses for the HBD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: bill-giffin at juno.com (Bill Giffin) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 12:57:01 cst Subject: HBD Those blank messages are messages that were sent to HBD AND IT DELETED THEM Once is a mistake to be corrected. twice is a mistake that the fix didn't work and you need a new fix. Three times and it is time to replace the defective item that defective item in this case is the AOB who is in charge of the HBD. Have a great day and a better BEER. Bill Return to table of contents
From: bill-giffin at juno.com (Bill Giffin) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 12:59:05 cst Subject: RE: Dreaded DMS Good evening, >>Larry Johnson commented: - - you want to drive off the dreaded DMS (or one of its precursors, rather) that can make your beer taste like creamed corn. << Hold on there Larry DMS isn't dreaded it is wonderful stuff. Without DMS lagers will taste insipid. If a beer doesn't have DMS chances are it isn't a beer. I grant you that too much isn't grand, sort of like having too much salt or pepper to season a dish. I wish the digest came in the morning and once a day as it did before it moved. Bill Richmond, Maine Return to table of contents
From: Anton Schoenbacher <aschoenb at eecs.wsu.edu> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 96 10:27:06 PST Subject: Why Lager's ? Why four they make lagers and not Ales at A-B ? - -- *****Anton Schoenbacher*****aschoenb at eecs.wsu.edu***** Return to table of contents
From: Wade Hutchison <whutchis at bucknell.edu> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 13:25:10 -0500 Subject: More counter (flow) arguments > >From: Spencer W Thomas <spencer at engin.umich.edu> >Date: Wed, 30 Oct 1996 15:05:28 -0500 >Subject: Re: Killer Chiller Question > >Mike Donald <mpd at plaza.ds.adp.com> writes: >> Correct - a counterflow heat exchanger has the hot fluid inlet and the cold >> fluid outlet at the same end. This produces the largest _average_ >> difference in temperature over the length of the chiller. > >You know, I don't think I can agree with this statement. Let's take a >hypothetical situation: > I'm sorry, but it's true whether you agree with it or not. >Assumptions: > 1. Flow rates of water and wort are identical (in volume-per-time) > 2. Heat capacities of water and wort are identical (close enough) > 3. The system is perfectly insulated. > >Supposition: > 4. Flow rate is adjusted so that exiting wort temperature is > 10deg above the entering water temperature. Ay, and here's the rub. If you make this assumption, then you will of couse get the same log-mean delta-T no matter how you run the water or wort. <nice analysis deleted> >8. The average temperature difference is then > Integral(0,L)[(T(x) - A) dx] / L = > [5 - (T0 - A)] / ln(5/(T0-A) > Note that this quantity is independent of the length of the chiller. For the assumptions you made, yes, since you fixed all of the temps > > With some reasonable assumptions > T0 = 100 > A = (100 + 20) / 2 = 60 > the average temperature difference is 16.8. Ok, go back, and calculate the area needed to achieve the cooling you specified at some fixed flow rate of the water and wort. You'll find that for a counter-flow design, the area will be less by about 7 to 10% less than for a co-current flow design. Or, from the more realistic approach, if I have a chiller of a certain size, I can use up to 10% less water and get the same cooling if I use a counter-flow chiller. -----wade whutchis at bucknell.edu Return to table of contents
From: John Wilkinson <jwilkins at imtn.tpd.dsccc.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 12:31:02 -0600 Subject: hot mash ... Regarding mash and strike water temps Barry Vanhoff said: >I might even go a little lower than 170F (shooting for 150F) but I'm not sure. >I think I'll aim low and add hot water later if necessary. I have found it easier to cool the mash adding tap water than to raise the temp with boiling. I always end up with too thin a mash when trying to go up. For instance, Mash T of 165F - Tap T of 70F = dT of 95F but Boiling T of 212F - Mash T of 145F = 67F. I usually use a strike temp of ~175F and add until the mash is well soaked but thick then check the temp. I then adjust to the desired temp and mash thickness. A short time above temp doesn't seem to hurt. I don't worry about the number of oz./lb. I am adding. I never seemed to get it all right trying to measure the strike water. I aim for the mash thickness I want at the temp I want. Of course, I heat the maximum amount of water I think I will need. John Wilkinson - Grapevine, Texas - jwilkinson at imtn.dsccc.com Return to table of contents
From: Mike Donald <mpd at plaza.ds.adp.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 09:09:14 PST Subject: Keg sediment - ------- Forwarded Message From: Russ Kruska <R.KRUSKA at CGNET.COM> To: bacchus <bacchus at aob.org> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 08:32:00 -0800 Subject: Keg sediment HELP !! I have a fully-carbonated cornelius keg full of amber ale that needs to be transported to another location for a friend's 40th birthday party. I am worried about stirring up the sediment from the bottom of the keg. I am unable to filter the beer (no filter) or rack it off the sediment (since it's already carbonated). I have read about counterpressure transfer from keg to keg, but have no way to monitor the receiving keg pressure so I am afraid to try that technique. Any suggestions out there ?? Could I release the pressure in the keg, xfer it under pressure and then recarbonate with CO2 ?? - ------- End of Forwarded Message Return to table of contents
From: Charles Burns <cburns at egusd.k12.ca.us> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 10:45:01 -0800 Subject: re:Sparge Necessary? David Hill (in hbd2256) asks if the sparge is really necessary, especially when using a high water/grist ratio. Good question and I think someone posted earlier that they were experimenting with the no-sparge technique - where's the report? Probably one of those [none] subject posts. In any case, your question about "how much sugar is still left" after draining the grain bed is a good one. I propose that we do a really simple experiment. Next batch, drain the mashtun, separate the runnings from the non-sparged grains from the sparged grains. Boil them separately. Test the SG of the sparged runnings. Report what the points per gallon "waste" was. We could all then make an informed decision, and on a 5 or 10 gallon batch I can tell you right now that I'd drop the sparge in a minute if it was < 2 points. But - are there other benefits to sparging? Charley Return to table of contents
From: "Tom Kelly" <tkelly at hologic.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 96 14:05:38 EST Subject: Chillers, 2-tier systems, etc. Fellow Brewers: In #2256 Al K. writes that the water inlet position on immersion chillers doesn't matter as long as the wort is stirred. I agree. You must circulate the wort to break the boundary layer between the coil and the liquid. Otherwise, efficiency of heat transfer drops enormously, especially below 100F. The Holder's asked about cleaning counterflow chillers. I use a counterflow heat exchanger (Heart's Super Chiller) which works extremely well. Chills 12 gallons to 75F in 15 minutes (4-fold faster than 35 feet of 3/8 copper tubing immersed). I sanitize by flushing with water immediately, then flushing with iodophor, and storing with iodophor. I suppose I'll have to run some TSP or equiv. through someday. Another advantage of counterflow--you can add the yeast as soon as chilling has commenced, since the wort exiting the chiller is at pitching temp. Enough on chillers. David Hill asked about a two-tier system. I brew in my basement (2nd second all-grain batch now fermenting). Low headroom ruled out a sparge water vessel. I bought a 4-gal point-of-use water heater at Home Depot (1500 Watts/120F-170F/$135.00). The trick here is to supply the point-of-use heater with 140F water from your hot water heater. Otherwise, the point-of-use heater won't have enough BTU's to take the water to 170F at 10-15 gallons/hr (sparge rate). I insulated all pipes and the point-of-use heater supplies 160F water to my sparge ring indefinitely at this rate. (There is approx. 10F drop in pipes and ring, however). Question. Is 160F hot enough? I'd be happier with 170F. I ordered a couple of thermostats that should take the temp in the 4 gal. tank up 10-15F. I've run the numbers on the BTU's necessary to take 140F water to 175F at the specified flow rate. (1500 watts is enough). I've been reading the digest for several months and figured it was about time to chime in. Tom K. Return to table of contents
From: RUSt1d? <rust1d at li.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:30:33 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Ouch! How bad is it? >In my ignorance, I have dry hopped into my primary fermenter. >I've since discovered that this was a *bad* thing to do (Charlie >P. says to absolutely avoid doing this). > >So, is it worth saving? It doesn't smell all that great, but >it is still undergoing rather active fermentation. I've got >half a mind to dump it and use the carboy to ferment a stout >recipe I've got waiting in the wings. Dumping this batch is the only *bad* thing you could do. The only reason CP says not to dry hop in the primary is because the aroma contributed by the hops will be outgassed with the CO2 during fermentation. Use the other half of your mind and taste it first. You could always add more dry hops if you are unhappy with the aroma/flavor. John Varady http://www.netaxs.com/~vectorsys/varady/index.html Boneyard Brewing Co. "The HomeBrew Recipe Calculating Program" "Ale today, Gone tomorrow." Return to table of contents
From: <egross at emory.edu> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:34:17 -0500 (EST) Subject: Atlanta brewpubs For your information, all brewpubs in Atlanta are not in Buckhead, which really is the bastion of meatmarket yuppiedom as opposed to great beer.Excellent beers are brewed by Keith Legget at the US Border Cantina in Roswell(I think, anyway, it's north of the perimeter). There is another John Harvards out there as well, and the superbly located Mill with brewmaster John Stuart, formerly of Winterpark, is located on Piedmont Park in Midtown.C. Burns missed great beer at the Phoenix, definitely the best of all the brewpubs he visited, though it is not an environment conducive to heavy duty partying.More Atlanta brewpubs are on the way. Lee Return to table of contents
From: David Hammond <hammer at nexen.com> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:39:41 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Ouch! How bad is it? > > Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:30:33 -0500 (EST) > From: RUSt1d? <rust1d at li.com> > Subject: Re: Ouch! How bad is it? > > Dumping this batch is the only *bad* thing you could do. The > only reason CP says not to dry hop in the primary is because > the aroma contributed by the hops will be outgassed with the > CO2 during fermentation. > Well, there's more to it than that, I thought. He expressed some concern about bacterial contamination. If I remember right, the alcohol produced by the primary fermentation keeps the microbes knocked down in the secondary. If you dry hop the primary, then the microbes have a chance to interact with the sugar before the yeast does. I have not experienced a contaminated brew yet, so I don't know whether the smell I detect coming out of the fermentation lock is that unusual (This is my 5th brew). It's strong, and I think a little wierd, but my wife says it smells like molasses (no molasses in the recipe). I dry hopped with pellets, not plugs or flowers, if that means anything. > > You could always add more dry hops if you are unhappy with the > aroma/flavor. > Hmmm...now there's an idea. Dave Return to table of contents
From: Nathan Moore <moorent at bechtel.Colorado.EDU> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 12:52:34 -0700 (MST) Subject: Primary Dry Hopping David Hammond asked about dry hopping into the primary. Relax, you should be fine. I did this several batches back without thinking and it turned out fine. You lose a lot of the aroma from scrubbing by the CO2 but you should still be able to notice the dry hopping. There is a very slight risk of infection because you placed the hops into the carboy before most of the sugar was converted but as long as you used clean hops, most of them are, you should be fine. I definitely wouldn't dump the beer. My philosophy is to always stick it out. Who knows if it did get infected somehow you could have an interesting David's Dry Hop P-Lambic. Nathan Moore Denver, CO Return to table of contents
From: Dave Riedel <RIEDEL at ios.bc.ca> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 12:08:56 -0800 (PST) Subject: Thermometer Expert products... anyone tried them? It seems my previous post was eaten by the (None) virus.... A few months ago, someone mentioned the thermometers carried by Thermometer Expert in Portland. They offer a 'meat' thermometer for ($18 + $3 handling)US which has a digital 32-248F (0-120C) range, a 4' probe, an alarm for pre-set temperature and a timer. I think that the alarm might be very handy as a warning of overly hot sparge water and as a 'ready-to-pitch' indicator during cooling. Has anyone tried this product? Is it well worth my $21? You can check the product out at: http://www.hk.linkage.net/%7Ethermo/ (no affiliation... ack ack) Dave Riedel, Victoria BC, Canada Return to table of contents
From: chris <king1679 at superlink.net> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 15:19:22 -0500 Subject: Zima Type brew Off hand I do not remember which mag it was in (BT I think) they had the exact recipe and process to make ZIMA. It was out of the realm of homebrewing (process and ingredients) but was an interesting read. There are chemicals for everything... stop foam production, stop color pick up, etc etc... Everthing that makes it a beer they remove or stop. Anyway I think the stuff sucks, but why not get your wife to drink a fruit-wheat beer or I have know plenty of woman to enjoy some of the Belgium Lambics or Cider. Chris Return to table of contents
From: chris <king1679 at superlink.net> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 15:28:43 -0500 Subject: Wild Goose They do not produce any unfiltered beers as part of the regular line. They very rarely produce something special for small accounts which I have never tasted but remember hearing about. A keg conditioned snow goose if I remember correctly. But as far as bottles go they are all filtered. The yeast they use is the same for all of their beers along with all Pugsley Beers, but off hand I can not remeber which it is. It is now avail. from Wyeast but it is not the Austrailian (at least I don't think it is). When I was brewing there they did put aside a few IPA that they did not put through the filter, but when we went to taste them they were BAD (infection). Chris King Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: William D Gladden <W_GLADDEN at Mail.Co.Chester.PA.US> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 15:37:51 -0500 Subject: immersion chiller construction question During a recent trip to the local home supply superstore, I noticed what I believe to be copper pipe/tube/whatever ... already formed into a coil in a box labeled as being made for hooking up automatic ice cube makers to a freezer. It comes in 3/8 inch and 1/2 inch diameters and up to around 20 or 25 feet in length. It seemed as though it would bend easily and even snap pretty easily *if* you bent it back and forth repeatedly. Since I don't plan to do that to an immersion chiller, I thought it may be just what I need. Has anyone made an immersion chiller with this stuff? If so ... any advice? If not ... why not? I think even I could make one if this stuff will work! Thanks. ps. Along the lines of the ideal 6 pack thread... If you are within the distribution range buy a mixed case of Victory Beer. The one I bought had Festbier, Brandywine Valley Lager, and the IPA [name slipped my mind]). The inlaws got quite the education and enjoyed one of each ... as well as some homebrew, before returning to Molson. The only greater favor you could give yourself is to stop at the Victory Brewing Co. brewpub/resteraunt in Downingtown, PA and have it on tap. No affiliation other than enjoying the increased quality of life from a top notch brewpub in my hometown. Bill Gladden: Downingtown, PA Direct flames to: <W_GLADDEN at Mail.Co.Chester.PA.US> I'm still trying to discern if ideas are better if they come off the top of my head or the bottom. Does it matter if I have a hot head? What is the best way to cool it? :-) Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: dharsh at alpha.che.uc.edu (David C. Harsh) Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 16:33:54 -0500 Subject: Temp diff in chillers: co- vs. counter-flow Warning: long post on heat transfer! >Spencer W Thomas <spencer at engin.umich.edu> writes: >Mike Donald <mpd at plaza.ds.adp.com> writes: >> Correct - a counterflow heat exchanger has the hot fluid inlet and the cold >> fluid outlet at the same end. This produces the largest _average_ >> difference in temperature over the length of the chiller. > >You know, I don't think I can agree with this statement. Let's take a >hypothetical situation: (For a counter-flow chiller:) >9. The "average" temperature difference is 10 deg. (For a parallel flow chiller:)... > the average temperature difference is 16.8. (I get 33.7 in my calculations) My problem is the ultimate performance of the exchangers Spencer describes: Counter-current: ******************** Wort In = 100 C * Heat * Wort Out = 30 C Cooling Water Out = 90 C * Exchanger * Cooling Water In = 20 C ******************** Co-current: ******************** Wort In = 100 C * Heat * Wort Out = 65 C Cooling Water In = 20 C * Exchanger * Cooling Water Out = 55 C ******************** Notice that the co-current exchanger did not exchange as much heat, - only a 35 C temp change was seen as opposed to 70 C! As a result, we can't compare the temperature driving forces for these two exchangers - no matter how large the co-current exchanger is, we can't get lower the wort temperature past the average inlet temperature of 60 C. Let's now consider the temperature limits given in the co-current case above in a counter-current exchanger so the total heat transfer is the same: Counter-current (#2): ******************** Wort In = 100 C * Heat * Wort Out = 65 C Cooling Water Out = 55 C * Exchanger * Cooling Water In = 20 C ******************** The average temperature difference in this case is 45 C. So the counter-current #2 exchanger requires less total exchanger area than the co-current exchanger with the same inlet and outlet temperatures. The decrease is directly proportional to the mean temperature differences. >The reason a CF chiller can be more efficient than an immersion or >other chiller is because it maximizes the temperature difference >between the *entering* coolant and the *entering* wort... No. The amount of heat transfer at any given point in an exchanger is dependent on the *local* temperature difference. Thus, the total heat transfer is based on the *average* temperature driving force. Counter-flow heat exchangers will always transfer more heat in the same area at the same flow rates than co-current exchangers for this reason. If you want more information, check out J.P. Holman's Heat Transfer, published by McGraw-Hill. Chapter 10 section 5 covers the use of average temperature driving forces in heat exchangers. I've taught Heat Transfer several times and teach a lab that covers Transport Phenomena, so this is actually an area that I feel I can claim competence in. Dave &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& & Dave Harsh & & DNRC Minister of Bloatarianism O- & & "non illegitimi carborundum" & &&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&&& Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: "David Kennedy" <HW1.DKENNED2 at HW1.CAHWNET.GOV> Date: 31 Oct 1996 14:39:14 PST Subject: What Comes Around "Ah yes, the good ol'days. While the phrase seems a bit trite, it is basically true. The reason that they were good is the signal-to-noise ratio (another overused phrase) was very high. The main reason for that is that the digest was full of questions and answers-good questions and good answers--and not so much speculation and flamage. It was not a bore, it was a joy to read--a real learning resource. There were not many who just spewed speculation and guesses in order to feel important. It was not that people weren't thinking for themselves; there were those who questioned the established routines. And there were usually constructive replies--or at least good debates (full of information) with very little name calling. The tension was very low. It seems that these days, there are those who are just waiting to pounce. (At least we haven't reverted to spelling flames)." This was submitted to Digest 952 in August of 1992. Sounds very similar to the current debate. Get a grip folks, the digest will improve, in fact 2257 had some very good posts. To those signing off, why the need for a grand exit posting, just unsubscribe. Chances are you will be back, since you will not find another group of people who enjoy discussing beer at this level. Things have not changed as much as you may think. Dave Kennedy Sacramento, CA Its a fine line between clever and stupid. -Spinal Tap Return to table of contents
From: <ROTH.TER at SEATTLE.VA.GOV> Date: 31 Oct 96 14:23 PDT Subject: XMAS BREW Wow---this is a very potent brew!!!! I would use only 2 or 3 cloves for 5 gals, and about 1-2 oz of sliced ginger. I think you can do a little experiment to see what this will taste like. Boil the listed ingredients in one quart of water, with the lid on to prevent evaporation. A simmer is best. After 45 minutes, pour a can of Coors or Miller----a relatively tasteless beer. Add your "soup" a half teaspooon at a time, and see how it tastes. Then you can scale up to 5 gallons. (ie, if one teaspoon has the taste you like, multiply by 20, or the ratio of 1 qt/5 gallons. Then add 20 teaspoons to 5 gals of wort in primary.) This method will also allow you to evalute the 'soup' for balance--too much clove, or ginger? Make a new 'spice soup' with adjusted amount of that spice and repeat the experiment. Be careful though---you might start to like spiked Coors !!! Return to table of contents
From: "William E. Steimle" <steimlew at holmes.uchastings.edu> Date: Thu, 31 Oct 1996 14:54:13 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: Keg sediment If you force carbonate and there is only a little sediment, I would suggest drinking a few pints of it yourself before moving it. I do this with my own kegs and by about the fifth glass, the beer is crystal clear, assuming you have given the sediment enough time to fall to the bottom. If, on the other hand, you naturally carbonated the kegs, I have no idea. Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: Date: Subject: [none] Return to table of contents
From: wrm at ccii.co.za (Wouter de Waal) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 12:17:44 +0200 Subject: Re: zima wife The Prince of Dark Beers, Satan himself, he of the psycho chicken, sez: >likes the dark, chewy, powerful stuff I make. Now that I think about it, >she's the only chick I know who prefers dark beers to light ones. As an Well, there's another one... My wife never drank beer until she found some Hansa (Namibia) Urbock. Nice and chewy, but I like 'em more bitter. So now you know about two womyn ('chick' is _so_ !PC) who like dark beer. :-) ObHomebrew: I thought that malt extact and DME were equivalent, just adjust the weight by 80% to compensate for the water in the extract. But I see that the Christmas Ale recipe calls for Munton&Fison extract and DME. What gives? Why not just more of either one? Wouter Return to table of contents
From: bill-giffin at juno.com (Bill Giffin) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 08:56:42 cst Subject: re: Dreaded DMS Good evening, >>Larry Johnson commented: - - you want to drive off the dreaded DMS (or one of its precursors, rather) that can make your beer taste like creamed corn. << Hold on there Larry DMS isn't dreaded it is wonderful stuff. Without DMS lagers will taste insipid. If a beer doesn't have DMS chances are it isn't a beer. I grant you that too much isn't grand, sort of like having too much salt or pepper to season a dish. I wish the digest came in the morning and once a day as it did before it moved. Bill Richmond, Maine P. S. This is the fourth time I have sent this post. Maybe the idea of censorship is not so far fetched. Return to table of contents
From: Steven Ketcham <ketcham at earthlink.net> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 05:32:12 -0800 (PST) Subject: Altenmunoter Brauer Bier Hello! My brother-in-law has given me a request for a beer in the style of "Altenmunoter Brauer Bier" listed on the bottle as a premium Bavaian beer. It is brewed and bottled by Privatbrauerei Franz Joseph Sailer, Marktoberdorf, Germany. I am not looking for a clone just style notes. I assume it is an Alt beer...? Thanks. Return to table of contents
From: "Kevin M. McAnulty, PE" <mrbridge at webspan.net> Date: Fri, 01 Nov 1996 08:46:32 -0800 Subject: Recipe for a German Wheat Double Bock Has anyone out there had the pleasure of trying an Imported beer by Schneider & Sohn called AVENTINUS. Its' a German Wheat Double Bock Ale that tastes a little like CHIMAY Grand Reserve (to me at least). I loved it so much that I would like to make something similar to it. I'm not an experienced brewer (5 or 6 successful batches so far), so, if anyone knows of a similar recipe please make it as simple as possible. The label says it has Chocolate, fruit & spices with a clove like finish. Thanks.. Kevin Return to table of contents
From: David Hammond <hammer at nexen.com> Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 09:46:47 -0500 (EST) Subject: Re: Ouch! How bad is it? Dave Hammond wrote: >In my ignorance, I have dry hopped into my primary fermenter. >I've since discovered that this was a *bad* thing to do (Charlie >P. says to absolutely avoid doing this). > >So, is it worth saving? It doesn't smell all that great, but >it is still undergoing rather active fermentation. I've got >half a mind to dump it and use the carboy to ferment a stout >recipe I've got waiting in the wings. I would like to say many thanks to all who responded to my post. The *unanimous* consensus is...DON'T DUMP! Therefore, I won't. I'll stick it out and just rack to a secondary when the primary is done and rehop again. Many of you pointed out that the aroma that I am trying to generate via the dry hopping would be mostly scrubbed out by the rapid release of the CO2 during primary fermentation. Many others question why Charlie P. would make a statement such as avoid dry hopping in the primary. His reasoning (if I remember correctly) is that when you dry hop into the secondary, there is less chance of infection due to the antibiotic effect of the alcohol now present in the wort. Should you dry hop into the primary prior to active ferm- entation (which is what I did) you open the door to conta- mination. So, I will not worry, I am now much more relaxed, and I have several bottles of pretty darned good homebrewed stout that I will enjoy this weekend while I am racking this brew (a PA that should resemble Shoals Pale Ale for those of you from New England) into the secondary. I will also be bottling an ESB that has been in the tank for 2 weeks, and brewing up another batch of honey-oatmeal stout for the holidays. This hobby kicks ass! =8^) Thanks again. Dave Return to table of contents
From: jay at ro.com (Jay Reeves) Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 09:02:02 -0600 Subject: Re: Chiller sanitation In HBD2256, Wayne Holder ask: >To anyone using a counter flow chiller, or anyone that has heard of >one, what is the recommended method of cleaning/sanitation? I've heard about folkes that run cleaners and then sanitizers thru their CFC prior to running the wort thru, but I don't believe all that work and waste of chemicals is needed. While the wort is boiling, I put a few gallons of water in the hot liquor tank and heat to boiling. That water is then run thru the CFC. When it comes time to chill the wort, connect all of the lines, start the chilling water, then start the wort flow. After you have your chilled wort, run more boiling water thru the CFC to clean it, then drain it. I store mine dry and open. If you clean it immediately after use this way, there shouldn't be any kind of buildup or residue left. I've done this with +40 batches and have not had any infections or off-flavors. Now my question: does anyone know what "Stout Malt" is? One of the homerew catalogs I've got says that it's a base malt used for making Stouts. It's obviously not a specialty grain. -Jay Reeves Hunstville, Alabama, USA Return to table of contents
From: D1FKV0W at BATLAN.BELL-ATL.COM Date: Fri, 1 Nov 1996 10:02:07 -0500 Subject: HBD #2253 not MIA Fellow HBDers, Since our janitor-in-training has not responded so far, I shall. Although I have frequent troubles getting the HBD (#2249 never showed up here), I have attributed them to our firewall, and I was among the blessed ones who received #2253. FWIW, several (possibly all) the posters who re-posted articles ended up repeating themselves. In case anyone does not know, one can order a back or missed issue from majordomo by sending a message of the following form: get n2253 end Include nothing else in the body. Just as a suggestion, one should probably order a missing issue from majordomo before re-posting anything that should have been in the missing issue. Happy Brewing! Robert A. West d1fkv0w at batlan.bell-atl.com. Return to table of contents