HOMEBREW Digest #4977 Mon 20 March 2006


[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]


	FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
		Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
       THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY: 

          Northern  Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies
Visit http://www.northernbrewer.com  to show your appreciation!
               Or call them at 1-800-681-2739

    Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********


Contents:
  Re: A question Re: question ("steve.alexander")
  Las Vegas Winterfest 2006 Results (Scott Alfter)
  re: Lamarck ("steve.alexander")
  George Fix ("John Kennedy")
  Falconer Foundation Brewing Scholarship Deadlines Approaching ("Lemcke, Keith")
  RE: Lamarck (Kurt Thorn)
  re:mini-kegs (Leo Vitt)
  OxyCap(r) ("Steve Dale-Johnson")

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The HBD Logo Store is now open! * * http://www.hbd.org/store.html * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Suppport this service: http://hbd.org/donate.shtml * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!! To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!** IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address for the automation - that's your job. HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org. LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there. The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit. More information is available by sending the word "info" to req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org. JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning, and Spencer Thomas
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 22:47:11 -0500 From: "steve.alexander" <steve-alexander at adelphia.net> Subject: Re: A question Re: question A.J deLange wrote: > For my money I'll take equivalence (normality) where it applies and > molarity where it doesn't. Which is why you'll have my full support in any run for water czar. BTW the x100 (vs x50) alkalinity & hardness unit as CaCo3 are still apparently alive and well in some aquarium test kits ! Yack ! -S Return to table of contents
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 20:37:48 -0800 From: Scott Alfter <scott at alfter.us> Subject: Las Vegas Winterfest 2006 Results Thanks to all of the brewers, judges, and stewards who participated, Winterfest turned out to be a nice little competition. 14 judges evaluated 70 beers, meads, and ciders from three states. 12 beers advanced to the Best of Show round. The following are the beers which, to steal a phrase from Iron Chef, reigned supreme: BoS: Jim Rossi from Oakley, CA, with a Munich Helles 2nd BoS: John Garbett from Las Vegas, NV, with a Saison 3rd BoS: Matt Stinchfield from Boulder City, NV, with a Doppelbock More detailed results are up on the SNAFU website: http://snafu.alfter.us/hof-files/winterfest06.shtml Scott Alfter scott at alfter.us Return to table of contents
Date: Sun, 19 Mar 2006 23:52:48 -0500 From: "steve.alexander" <-s at adelphia.net> Subject: re: Lamarck Kurt Thorn writes .... >Steve gives a nice history lesson about Lamarck and Darwin >but he's somewhat incorrect in ruling out Lamarckian >inheritance: Not a history, just a time-line. Please re-read my post, Kurt. I did not 'rule out Lamarckism' as you claim except to state that Lamarck's generalizations, that traits acquired from use/disuse are passed on to the point of species differentiation as one general mechanism of evolution are in error. Max Delbruck (the nobel winner not the earlier brewing scientist) put a fork in that one in the 1940s. If you really mean to imply the Arnold Schwarzenegger's kids will have bigger biceps as a result of the time the Governor spent in the gym then we disagree on a different level. If one examines Lamarck's laws http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lamarck then clearly the use of "all" in the second law is egregiously in error and the word 'seldom' or 'rarely' would make more sense here. Kurt certainly has credentials on the genetics issue but I can't really follow his comments on brewing yeasts. >When a yeast cell divides, the mother and daughter >cell split the cellular contents equally. I've got some bad news for you, sunshine. Brewing yeast cells bud; they are not fission yeasts. Brewing yeast division is asymmetric with daughters about 1/6th the volume of mature/senescent cells in anaerobic fermentation. The mother cell is much larger, has more of the total lipids, many other differences and will divide again more rapidly. Brewing yeast cell size increases with age, yet daughter cell size is constant (K.Smart, 'Brewing Yeast Fermentation Performance', 2000 Blackwell Sci.). This isn't the norm for eukaryotes, but applies to brewing yeasts. >This means that they get equal shares of not only the DNA >but also of all the enzymes and so on. They get UNequal shares of course. >So if your parent is adapted for >high gravity or cold and has expressed certain proteins >to enable that adaptation, the daughter cell will get >them as well. Oh come now - most of these are enzymes which have a very limited lifespan. Unless the environmental trigger persists the daughter is unlikely to express many traits. I'm certain there are exceptions, but it's very misleading to use such language Kurt. Consider the sugar permease proteins which facilitate maltose or M3 induction. These are ineffective in tens of minutes after the trigger is removed. The expression persists in the parent for only minutes after - so it's rather unlikely to cause expression in later daughter cells. I'm certain there are exceptions, certain stress prions which are inheritable for example, but that's not a case for such generalized misleading language. If you really believe your generalization Kurt, that if parental expression appears, then daughter and grand-daughter cells generally will generally express too, then you'll need to explain to me why so many cases show the opposite result .... permeases, flocculation, dormancy, crabtree ... such expressions are triggered by transient environmental conditions and disappear rapidly. -S Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 15:50:38 +1000 From: "John Kennedy" <johnk at readybake.com.au> Subject: George Fix Hi Jeff, That was a nice thing you did for George on the HBD, you are very thoughtful, as you can guess I'm a fan as well. Regards John Kennedy Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 10:09:57 -0500 From: "Lemcke, Keith" <klemcke at siebelinstitute.com> Subject: Falconer Foundation Brewing Scholarship Deadlines Approaching Just a reminder about an approaching deadline for two very generous scholarships. The Glen Hay Falconer Foundation Brewing Scholarships are two full-tuition scholarships for the 2006 World Brewing Academy Concise Course in Brewing Technology held at the Siebel Institute of Technology in Chicago this fall. The Scholarships are open to professional brewers as well as homebrewers from the Pacific Northwest (including Alaska and Hawaii) and Northern California regions (San Francisco Bay/Monterey Bay areas and north). Each Scholarship includes a $500 stipend to help offset travel and lodging expenses. The full application must be received no later than April 20, 2006. For complete information on how to apply for these scholarships, visit the Siebel Institute website at http://siebelinstitute.com/registration/falconer_scholarship.html. Keith Lemcke Vice-President Siebel Institute of Technology World Brewing Academy Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:30:09 -0500 From: Kurt Thorn <Kthorn at CGR.Harvard.edu> Subject: RE: Lamarck > Kurt. I did not 'rule out Lamarckism' as you claim except > to state that Lamarck's generalizations, that traits > acquired from use/disuse are passed on to the point of > species differentiation as one general mechanism of > evolution are in error. Max Delbruck (the nobel winner I agree with you here. I meant to say only that there are possible mechanisms for Lamarckian inheritance to influence traits in brewing. >When a yeast cell divides, the mother and daughter >cell split the cellular contents equally. > I've got some bad news for you, sunshine. Brewing yeast > cells bud; they are not fission yeasts. Brewing yeast I should have said that the concentration of proteins will be the same in mother and daughter cells immediately after division. Of course the absolute amounts will change because the cell size is different, but in general the relevant quantity is the concentration of the protein, not its absolute abundance. > Oh come now - most of these are enzymes which have a > very limited lifespan. Unless the environmental trigger This is true for some proteins and untrue for others. However, the time scales that this is occurring on (one or two cell cycles, so a few hours), while exciting biologically may not be as relevant for brewing. The cases I'm most aware of involve temperature shocks, where it seems that pre-stressing the organism can certainly confer tolerance to a stress that occurs later. > I'm certain there are exceptions, certain stress prions > which are inheritable for example, but that's not a case > for such generalized misleading language. I certainly didn't mean to say that this was generally true, just to suggest that there are mechanisms for transfer of information between generations which may be relevant, just as there are mechanisms for responding to environmental conditions (which certainly are relevant). Kurt Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 12:05:04 -0800 (PST) From: Leo Vitt <leo_vitt at yahoo.com> Subject: re:mini-kegs Michael asked about re-using minikegs: >I have a friend who has been drinking beer from >Heineken mini-kegs, and I was wondering if anyone knew >whether these kegs were re-usable for homebrewing. He >has 3 or four, which would certainly save on bottling >time! Thanks... I have reused minikegs that were from comercial German imported beer, but not the Heineken kegs. The ones I reused did not have the put at tap near the bottom, but relied on inserting a tap on top. I don't know the the Heineken kegs have that little tap on the side or not. My question if they do... Has someone kegged in minikegs that have that tap. Use less priming surgar than you use in bottles. Maybe 10 years ago, I found the recommendations in HBD how much to use. If my memory is correct, it is 1/2 cup instead of the tradition 3/4 cup for the 5 gal batch, and till 4 5-liter minikegs. That same submission also covered kegging part of the batch, then adding more surgar to bottle the remainder. I filled the mini-kegs using my bottle filler. Insert the center bung into the rubber bung. If the rubber bung is wet, it will go in with a small tap with a hammer. Hang on the the little plastic bung that gets pushed into the keg. If your friend did not rinse the kegs out, I would be afraid to re-use them. Leo Vitt Sidney, NE Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 20 Mar 2006 13:30:43 -0800 From: "Steve Dale-Johnson" <sdalejohnson at hotmail.com> Subject: OxyCap(r) Fred, the caps I got from Paddock Wood have (in all caps) OXYCAP (R) on the flutes, and most certainly have something reactive in them that goes from translucent to opaque white in the liner of the cap as they spend longer on the bottle. Just one more divergent data point to screw up the math ;)' <snip>The caps offered by Paddock Wood Brewing apparently are NOT oxygen scavenging caps <snip> Like I said, I'm pretty sure mine are, and at least *were* available from Paddock Wood.... Steve Dale-Johnson Brewing at 1918 miles, 298 degrees Rennerian Delta (Vancouver), BC, Canada. Return to table of contents
[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]
HTML-ized on 03/20/06, by HBD2HTML v1.2 by KFL
webmaster@hbd.org, KFL, 10/9/96