HOMEBREW Digest #5454 Thu 20 November 2008


[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]


	FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
		Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
        OCTOBER'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY: 

                 Ypsilanti Brewing Company
        Visit them at http://www.ypsilantibrewing.com/ 
			 
    Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a 
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton Township, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250 
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any 
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your 
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available 
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
  Re: Pseudo Lagering ("Craig S. Cottingham")
  wort ("Fred Scheer")
  Re: Pseudo Lagering (Randall Ricchi)
  Re: Pseudo Lagering (Jeff Renner)
  RE: Commercial Sparging ("Kevin Weaver")
  Re: Pseudo Lagering (Kai Troester)
  The effect of mash parameters on fermentability and efficiency (Kai Troester)

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * The HBD Logo Store is now open! * * http://www.hbd.org/store.html * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!! To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!** IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address for the automation - that's your job. HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org. LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there. The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit. More information is available by sending the word "info" to req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org. JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning, and Spencer Thomas
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 23:30:21 -0600 From: "Craig S. Cottingham" <craig.cottingham at gmail.com> Subject: Re: Pseudo Lagering On Nov 19, 2008, at 16:20, "Lance Harbison" <harbison65 at verizon.net> wrote: > How > important is the lowering of the temperature to lagering > temperature at a > rate of 1-2 degrees per day, since when space opens in the fridge > any keg > will simply be plopped in? I've never tried it myself, but I can't imagine that a slow, controlled lowering of temperature is strictly necessary. Bavarian caves weren't fitted with Ranco controllers when lagering was invented, to my knowledge. - -- Craig S. Cottingham BJCP Certified judge from Olathe, KS ([621, 251.1deg] Apparent Rennerian) craig.cottingham at gmail.com +1 (913) 826-6896 or Skype me at CraigCottingham Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 06:16:04 -0600 From: "Fred Scheer" <fredscheer at gmail.com> Subject: wort HI Fred: Sorry for posting a bit late, but we are getting ready here for the MBAA One Day Technical Conference in Gatlingburg. I would like to give you an example of our brewery. Please keep in mind that depending on strength of beer, style, etc, more malt and more water is used, but you know that. The example I give is an average: The day of brewing 10 BBL water at 170*F 1 BBL to heat mash-tun 4 BBL mash - in H20 grist/water ratio 1:2.8 sparge water 5 BBL First wort between 2.2 and 2.7 BBL Kettle full 8 BBL sparging ~ 3 gal/min; ~ 50 min, most times <3gal/min, and 60 min sparge the same is for the total run, ~ 3 gal (or less) per min., meaning kettle is full ~ 80 minutes Ihope you where looking for that info, Fred (you know, the other Fred) Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 07:50:51 -0500 From: Randall Ricchi <rricchi at houghton.k12.mi.us> Subject: Re: Pseudo Lagering This is one of those situations where you do the best you can with what you have. Ideally you would drop the temp gradually (5 degrees per day is good) so that you don't shock the yeast, but what you're going to do will work just as well, I think. While the 3 unrefrigerated kegs are waiting there turn in the cold, they will continue to mature, the yeast cleaning up after itself, and doing so at a faster rate than it would in the cold. Even with regular ale yeasts that don't work well in the cold (if at all) prolonged cold storage somehow "cleans up" the flavor profile of a beer. Possibly the coagulation and settling of polyphenols is the reason? > > Date: Wed, 19 Nov 2008 16:20:16 -0500 > From: "Lance Harbison" <harbison65 at verizon.net> > Subject: Pseudo Lagering > > I just kegged (in 4 cornies) 17 gal of Altbier. I plan on lagering each > keg, but currently only have room for 1 of the kegs in my fridge. The > remaining 3 kegs are resting in my 60F basement until space opens up. How > important is the lowering of the temperature to lagering temperature at a > rate of 1-2 degrees per day, since when space opens in the fridge any keg > will simply be plopped in? Similarly, are there any negatives to delayed > lagering? > > Lance Harbison > Pittsburgh > > > Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 08:08:47 -0500 From: Jeff Renner <jsrenner at umich.edu> Subject: Re: Pseudo Lagering "Lance Harbison" <harbison65 at verizon.net> wrote from Pittsburgh: > I just kegged (in 4 cornies) 17 gal of Altbier. I plan on lagering > each > keg, but currently only have room for 1 of the kegs in my fridge. The > remaining 3 kegs are resting in my 60F basement until space opens > up. How > important is the lowering of the temperature to lagering > temperature at a > rate of 1-2 degrees per day, since when space opens in the fridge > any keg > will simply be plopped in? Similarly, are there any negatives to > delayed > lagering? Lance, Lance, Lance. You live in Pittsburgh! How about using that big fridge with the blue ceiling? Well, this time of year, the gray ceiling. Or even better, if you have a garage, it's probably staying above freezing this time of year. Either way, it will take some management, especially if you put the kegs outdoors. For that you could make a box of styrofoam sheets or even cardboard, and bring the kegs inside for a short time when they get too cold. Even if the beer actually freezes, it won't hurt, and may actually help clarify it. I think that you are being too conservative regarding the rate of temperature drop. It's important not to shock the yeast so that it can continue to slowly ferment any residual sugars, but it can survive a drop of 5-10 degrees F per day, as I understand it. I just put my green beers in the fridge and figure that the thermal mass probably slows the drop enough to keep from shocking the yeast, and it always works. While it shouldn't hurt too much to delay lagering, you may lose some of the freshness that would be preserved at cold temperatures. At near freezing, your beer will stay in prime condition far longer. And while altbier it traditionally lagered at around 40F/4C rather than the 32F/0C or even colder for bottom fermenting lagers, I think I'd just go for as cold as is convenient. Jeff PS - Lance's post is a prime example of why I always ask folks to include their location in their posts. Aside from contributing to a sense of community, it often helps to answer questions, as in this case. - --- Jeff Renner in Ann Arbor, Michigan USA, jsrenner at umich.edu "One never knows, do one?" Fats Waller, American Musician, 1904-1943 Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 10:46:51 -0500 From: "Kevin Weaver" <kweaver at brewmation.com> Subject: RE: Commercial Sparging I'm hoping more readers post their opinions about the two methods...1) collecting the complete volume in the kettle and 2) topping up the kettle with make-up water. I find the two posts interesting because our brewery designs have always provided the means of using the make up water. On my personal system, I have it programmed to give me the option of doing either method for testing purposes. The only difference I have seen is a calculated increase in efficiency while using method #2. Of course there are many factors to this, such as sparging time, grain bills, actual efficiency of the MT etc. We use peristaltic pumps so the sparge time is very predictable and repeatable, so perhaps this is why the variation between the two methods is minimal and I do not run into PH issues. It's just made me question how necessary the added cost of providing the "make-up" water option really is. Adding this to the semi-auto system is not a big deal... However, for the fully automatic system it does add to the cost. Does anyone have results/opinions they can share? There are a lot of brewers designing their own systems so I would think it's a good topic. Kevin Brewmation Incorporated www.brewmation.com Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 13:00:18 -0500 From: Kai Troester <kai at braukaiser.com> Subject: Re: Pseudo Lagering > How > important is the lowering of the temperature to lagering temperature at a > rate of 1-2 degrees per day, since when space opens in the fridge any keg > will simply be plopped in? Similarly, are there any negatives to delayed > lagering? The importance of lowering the temperature gradually depends on if the yeast is still needed or not. If it is not needed (i.e. all the sugars that the yeast was supposed to eat are eaten and diacetyl and other young beer components have been sufficiently reduced) there is no problem with "crashing" the yeast. In this case lagering only serves to cold stabilize the beer by precipitating hazes. In your case, and most other home brewer's case, fermentation is complete before lagering starts. Especially if a warm rest (aka diacetyl rest) is done at the end of primary fermentation or if primary fermentation is extended until there is no airlock activity left and the yeast has dropped out. In these cases you can just crash the beer. That's what I do and I have also found out the hard way that it is rather tricky to keep the yeast active enough while lowering the temp. The result have been uderattenuated beers. So you will be fine with serial lagering for these kegs of Altbier, especially since the yeast can take care of the beer while it is still sitting at 60F. B/c of fermentation space constrains I had to forgo lagering on my current Altbier. I only clarified it with gelatin and then bottled with a lager yeast to allow for carbonation in the 60F basement. The beer is great. Kai Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2008 15:57:30 -0500 From: Kai Troester <kai at braukaiser.com> Subject: The effect of mash parameters on fermentability and efficiency For most of this year I have been conduction micro scale mashing experiments that were designed to evaluate the effects that mash. I already posted intermediate results earlier this year, but now I have finally wrapped up the experiment and posted the results on my site: http://braukaiser.com/wiki/index.php?title=Limit_of_attenuation_experiment There is also a PDF version (which prints better, sorry about the wrap on the address. But HBD needs me to keep the line length below 80): http://braukaiser.com/documents/ Effects_of_mash_parameters_on_attenuation_and_efficiency.pdf And James Spencer from Basic Brewing Radio interviewed me for this week?s podcast: http://www.basicbrewing.com/index.php?page=radio All in all, this has been a quite interesting series of experiments for me with a few surprises. The surprises were that mash thickness has hardly any effect on fermentability but it can have a significant effect on efficiency. The thinner mashes showed better results with respect to their ability to convert the starch in the grist. Another surprise was that the efficiency in these micro mashes was not as good as the one I get in the 5 gal mashes I make to brew beer. In those big mashes I can get 100% conversion efficiency (i.e. convert all the starch present in the mash) whereas I did not see this for any of the mashes in the experiment. Kai Return to table of contents
[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]
HTML-ized on 11/20/08, by HBD2HTML v1.2 by KFL
webmaster@hbd.org, KFL, 10/9/96