HOMEBREW Digest #5930 Mon 02 April 2012


[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]


	FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
		Digest Janitor: pbabcock at hbd.org


***************************************************************
        TODAY'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY: 

         No "sponsor-level" donation yet this year

    Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site!
********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html *********

DONATE to the Home Brew Digest. Home Brew Digest, Inc. is a 
501(c)3 not-for-profit organization under IRS rules (see the
FAQ at http://hbd.org for details of this status). Donations
can be made by check to Home Brew Digest mailed to:

HBD Server Fund
PO Box 871309
Canton, MI 48187-6309

or by paypal to address serverfund@hbd.org. DONATIONS of $250 
or more will be provided with receipts. SPONSORSHIPS of any 
amount are considered paid advertisement, and may be deductible
under IRS rules as a business expense. Please consult with your 
tax professional, then see http://hbd.org for available 
sponsorship opportunities.
***************************************************************


Contents:
  talk radio ("Richard Gleason, Jr")
  Re: No chill brewing (Mike Schwartz)
  no chill brewing! ("Darrell G. Leavitt")
  Fwd: No chill brewing (David Houseman)
  Dry Hopping ("Gary Peyton")
  No chill brewing ("Dave Burley")

* * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * NOTE: With the economy as it is, the HBD is struggling to meet its meager operating expenses of approximately $3500 per year. If less than half of those currently directly subscribed to the HBD sent in a mere $5.00, the HBD would be able to easily meet its annual expenses, with room to spare for next year. Please consider it. Financial Projection as of 03 March 2012 *** Condition: Guarded *** 501(c)3 revoked in process of retroactive reinstatement. See Site News on http://hbd.org for details and progress. Projected 2012 Budget $3191.79 Expended against projection $ 721.78 Unplanned expenditures $ 79.98 Projected Excess/(Shortfall) ($ 725.01) As always, donors and donations are publicly acknowledged and accounted for on the HBD web page. Thank you Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!! To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!** IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address for the automation - that's your job. HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org. LOOKING TO BUY OR SELL USED EQUIPMENT? Please do not post about it here. Go instead to http://homebrewfleamarket.com and post a free ad there. The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit. More information is available by sending the word "info" to req@hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org. JANITORs on duty: Pat Babcock (pbabcock at hbd dot org), Jason Henning, Spencer Thomas, and Bill Pierce
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2012 20:36:36 -0700 (PDT) From: "Richard Gleason, Jr" <rgleasonjr at att.net> Subject: talk radio Hey Joseph - I tried to visit the link you provided, but my computer will not let me go there. Now what? Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:29:15 -0500 From: Mike Schwartz <mjs at seadogboats.com> Subject: Re: No chill brewing David Root asks "I guess my question is why is quick chilling so important"? SSM, the precursor to DMS, is converted to DMS quickly at temperatures above 140F. DMS is volatile so it will come out of the beer during boiling. If you cover a hot vat of wort you will generate and trap the DMS. That's why Rolling Rock always had that cooked corn smell and taste. If you like corn in your beer, no problem, if not, chill fast after the boil. Some people really like that flavor, others don't. All depends on your taste. As for not pitching for three days after the boil, you got lucky and had great sanitation. The sooner the yeast are in the less chance the spoilage organisms have to take hold. As for the sanitation effects of hot wort in your fermenter, you could always chill after you transfer the beer to the fermenter. Just avoid aeration. Mike Schwartz Beer Barons of Milwaukee beerbarons.org worldofbeerfestival.com Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 10:03:16 -0400 (EDT) From: "Darrell G. Leavitt" <leavitdg at plattsburgh.edu> Subject: no chill brewing! Wow! David that is a hoot! One of the things that I have read about from numerous brewing books is the claim that the time that it takes to chill the wort is critical in that this is the time when one could get a contamination. The quicker one chills, they say, the less the chance of contamination. Are you not comfortable with bleach, or some of the newer sanitizers? This is really interesting in that it goes against one of the "cardinal rules". I need a therapist! Or perhaps a beer! Let's see what others have to say. Darrell Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 02 Apr 2012 08:42:03 -0500 (CDT) From: David Houseman <david.houseman at verizon.net> Subject: Fwd: No chill brewing There are two reasons for not doing this no chill brewing. The first is that you do not produce sterile wort. No matter what you do you will introduce some amount of wild yeast, bacteria or mold spores into the wort. As the wort cools slowly you have a great reproduction broth for these organisms. You really want to chill and pitch a quantity of yeast that will take off and overwhelm any other organism, not leaving them with food for their own growth. The second is DMS. Dimethyl sulfide (DMS) is often perceived as canned corn or other vegetables. The DMS precursor is in malt, much more in lightly kilned malts (pilsner, lager) and less so in pale ale malt and even less so in the darker roasted malts. When you boil for an hour or so you drive off the DMS that forms. But DMS will re-form as the wort cools. That's why you boil uncovered as well; the DMS will condense and roll back into the kettle. Wort that cools below about 170-180oF (forget the exact temps) will reform DMS until the wort reacheds about 100-105oF (again I may have exact temps wrong). You want to transition this range as fast as possible. Then AERATE (O2) the wort VERY well and then pitch the right amount of healthy viable yeast. Oh, a third: You really don't want to carry hot break aterial over to the fermenter; this reduces shelf life and beer quality. Cold break is OK; you can leave that. You will produce beer with no-chill brewing but it will not be as good as it can be. With all the water and energy used in chilling, breweries world-wide would do that if it were a viable option. They don't for very good reasons. Worth an experiment. Make 10 gallons (or whatever) and take 1/2 to a fermenter (no chill) and chill the other 1/2. Do everything else the same with them. Then taste the results. To be a good experiment you may have to repeat several times. Document your experiment and come speak at the AHA conference. David Houseman Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 13:13:49 -0500 From: "Gary Peyton" <gpeyton2 at comcast.net> Subject: Dry Hopping As an alternative to dry hopping, it seems as though soaking the hops in vodka would extract more of the volatile hop oils from hops than would water or wort, since the solubility of hydrocarbons like myrcene should be higher in ethanol than in water*. One could even use everclear (95%) or some dilution of it. There may be some more polar compounds left in the hops that would be less efficiently extracted by alcohol. I would have thought that these would be expected to be less important contributors to aroma, but apparently not so. Lots of good information here: http://beersensoryscience.wordpress.com/2010/11/30/glycosides/ . In addition, late-boil hops could also be added to generate the oxidation products like linalool and geraniol if wanted. Even better might be decanting the extract and using the remaining hops for the late-boil addition (read down to the part on "spent hop powder" in the above reference). So, the main thing this might accomplish would be decreasing the loss of the volatile aroma compounds. The extract could be added to the primary, secondary, or bottling bucket/keg. Comments? Results? *I don't have any numbers, but the Merck Index says beta-myrcene is "practically insoluble in water" but is "soluble in alcohol" (probably means 100% alcohol). Gary Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 2 Apr 2012 16:29:14 -0400 From: "Dave Burley" <Dave Burley at charter.net> Subject: No chill brewing David Root, There is a lot to be said for skipping a step in brewing if it does not affect the outcome. However, you will find tons of printed testimonials about not exposing hot beer to the air before the yeast are active and able to absorb it. In my experience this hot oxidation is what ruins most amateur beers and is a charateristic which defines homebrewing in too many instances. " Cellar palate" is a common problem ( and why we have local contests) and can lead one to say "well my beer is OK" when in fact it has a major fault, to which you have become accustomed.. Your method of filling your fermenter from the bottom will minimize the oxidation, but you will still have it to some degree. Try a comparison of chilling vs not chilling of the same beer recipe and see if you can tell the diference by direct comparison.. Filling the fermenter from the bottom will likely minimize hot oxidation. Keep on Brewin', Dave Burley" Return to table of contents
[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]
HTML-ized on 04/03/12, by HBD2HTML v1.2 by KFL
webmaster@hbd.org, KFL, 10/9/96