HOMEBREW Digest #1435 Sat 28 May 1994

Digest #1434 Digest #1436


	FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
		Rob Gardner, Digest Janitor


Contents:
  cider recipes/wheat infusion (Mark A Fryling)
  SF / mini-kegs / beer & food recipes (Michael Carr - ATT ASCC)
  YeastLab Weizen (Art Steinmetz)
  Awesome (Jack Schmidling)
  weird ferment (RONALD DWELLE)
  CO2 quick disconnects (Bob Jones)
  Bentonite - really works ("Anton Verhulst")
  re: beginner's primary fermentation question (Dan Beauvais)
  Stirred mashes (Allen Ford)
  RE:quicks and weizens (Jim Busch)
  Looking for equipment ("Aaron Spurlock")
  British Malt comparison? ("Mark B. Alston")
  Hopeful end to mill discussions (KLAY)
  Mills and stouts (matth)
  another request for spruce beer info (Jay Weissler)
  The yeast faq again!!! (It just keeps getting better) (Patrick Weix)
  extraction efficiency (?) (Frank Haist)
  strange grains (Jeffrey A. Ziehler)
  libel (Jim Doyle)
  Hops in training (Allen Glass)
  Re: Quick Disconnect for CO2 (Michael Burgeson)
  Southport Beer Festival ("THOMAS L. STOLFI")
  Spruce Bashing (RONALD MOUCKA)
  Spruce Bashing (RONALD MOUCKA)
  Mash Newbie Questions (David Lambermont)
  Flavors of Munich and Vienna Malts (Ken Schroeder)

Send articles for __publication_only__ to homebrew at hpfcmi.fc.hp.com (Articles are published in the order they are received.) Send UNSUBSCRIBE and all other requests, ie, address change, etc., to homebrew-request@ hpfcmi.fc.hp.com, BUT PLEASE NOTE that if you subscribed via the BITNET listserver (BEER-L at UA1VM.UA.EDU), then you MUST unsubscribe the same way! If your account is being deleted, please be courteous and unsubscribe first. FAQs, archives and other files are available via anonymous ftp from sierra.stanford.edu. (Those without ftp access may retrieve files via mail from listserv at sierra.stanford.edu. Send HELP as the body of a message to that address to receive listserver instructions.) Please don't send me requests for back issues - you will be silently ignored. For "Cat's Meow" information, send mail to lutzen at novell.physics.umr.edu
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Fri, 27 May 94 8:44:54 EDT From: Mark A Fryling <mfryling at magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> Subject: cider recipes/wheat infusion Hi gang, Someone (sorry but I dont remember who) asked about some good cider recipes the other day. Well, I've had good luck with both dry, sparkling and sweet still variants so I thought I'd post the recipes. First of all let me say that the quality of the finished product depends heavily on the flavor of the cider that you start with. Being here in Ohio we dont really get the best cider apples so the quality is probably not quite up to what you can get in New England. I hear that Northern Spy is one of the very best cider apples. That said though, any good quality, fresh, unpasteurized cider will make a perfectly acceptable hard cider. So without further ado: Dry Cider (like Blackthorn or Woodpecker) Simply pitch a good quality wine yeast (I find Lalvin 71B-1122 Narbonne to be excellent) into your fresh, unpasteurized and unfiltered cider. Rack after 1 week and bottle with corn sugar (3/4c for 5 gal) when the cider is crystal clear. - Note #1: My experience is that cider has a SG of 1.040 - 1.055 so the resulting hard cider will be in the 5% abv range. - Note #2: Some folks like to kill off the wild yeast with bisulfite before pitching their wine yeast, but I find that this is unnecissary and leads to unplesant residual sulfur taste. Sweet (and Strong) Still Cider - 3 gal recipe 3 gal fresh (unpasteurized etc.) apple cider 4 lbs light brown sugar 1 lb dark brown sugar 9 grams of crushed cinnamon stick 10 whole cloves (crushed before adding) Dissolve sugar in cider (you can warm it to help the sugar dissolve) and add everything to your fermenter. 1 tsp yeast energizer (the kind that's a mixture of urea and B-vitamins) 10 g of Lalvin 71B-1122 OG = 1.120 FG = 1.002 (pretty impressive huh?) Fermeneted wildly in primary for about 2 weeks then took about 7 weeks in secondary to clear sufficiently to bottle. I dont remember what the abv works out to be on this stuff but its HIGH. Definitely something to be enjoyed in moderation. It is however absolutely wonderful. The spices give it a kind of christmas-y feel that just makes me feel all warm and fuzzy (or maybe thats the alcohol 8*). This would also make some absolutely WICKED apple-jack if someone were to freeze some of the finished product (though I would never advocate such irresponsible, illegal and dangerous behaviour ;-). Now for a beer question, would whoever has something to say about the question posted friday about single step infusion mashing of weizen beers please either post their replys or send them to me directly? I also am planning to try out the Wyeast 3068 to make a partial mash dunkel-weizen. My plan has been to mash belgian ale malt and use extract to get my wheat malt but if I can mash some wheat too (in my single infusion procedure), without making the finished beer come out like chocolate milk I'll give it a try. TIA Have fun, Mark Fryling <mfryling at magnus.acs.ohio-state.edu> "Never let your sense of morality prevent you from doing whats right" I. Asimov Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 09:02:37 EDT From: carr at ascc01.ascc.att.com (Michael Carr - ATT ASCC) Subject: SF / mini-kegs / beer & food recipes First, thanks to everyone who sent me info about San Francisco brew-sights, we had a great trip. Dave Knight, you posted some notes about Brew King mini-kegs. I tried mailing you some questions about them and it bounced, so I'll ask here (they may be of general interest anyway): - where are they available? - how much do they cost? (whole setup & per brewing) And sometime previous there was a request for food recipes with beer. A friend gave me a wonderful book as a homewarming present: "Real Beer and Good Eats: The Rebirth of America's Beer and Food Traditions" by Bruce Aidells and Denis Kelly. It's a great book describing the history of beer & brewing in the U.S., in general and by region, up to through today's explosion of microbreweries (published in '92). Each regional section has food recipes typical of that area. The recipes don't all use beer as an ingredient, in fact most don't, they are chosen to complement beer drinking and include recommendations of local moicrobrews to go with the food. It also includes appendices on things like homebrewing and world beer styles. Mike Carr // AT&T Advanced Software Construction Center // carr at ascc01.att.com // If I exorcise my devils my angels may leave too, and when they leave // they are so hard to find - Tom Waits Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 09:14:38 -0400 From: Art Steinmetz <asteinm at pipeline.com> Subject: YeastLab Weizen Nancy Renner writes: >Chris [Mack] says he would brew with the YeastLab Bavarian Weizen yeast if >someone would attest to it. One of our club members took Best of Show with an >*extract* beer made with this yeast this past year in the S.N.O.B.S. competition >in Cleveland. Yes. I took second place in the 1993 national Weiss is Nice competition with an extract beer using this yeast. This year I'm using Wyeast only because I can't find the YeastLab strain. Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 08:15 CDT From: arf at mcs.com (Jack Schmidling) Subject: Awesome I have been flooded with mail in response to my unbiased views of the product I manufacture. The vast majority has been positive and fun but there is always a small minority who just don't or don't want to "get it". For the record the "Ode to the MM" came right off a flyer on the Jaguar that my wife got in the mail and we did a little creative editing just to show the folks what real hype sounds like. Cheers, js Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 10:15:34 EST From: dweller at GVSU.EDU (RONALD DWELLE) Subject: weird ferment This is what happened. A month or so ago, after a normal mash, boil, etc. I pitched yeast (Brit Ale, Wyeast 1098), and got a good ferment in 12 hours (but not vigorous or violent blow-off). This was a Friday evening. Went away for the weekend and when I came home Sunday night, there was zero activity. I thought maybe things had gotten too cool, so set the carboy on a heating pad to bring the water temp back up. Nothing. For two days. So I decided to re-pitch, and I did Am Ale which I had on hand (Wyeast 1056). Nothing. For two more days. So I pitched another jug of Am Ale yeast. Nothing. Finally, (duh...) I check SG and got a reading of 1.015. I'd been pitching all this new yeast and there was nothing left to ferment. But that means I got a total ferment of 5 gallons in about 48 hours. Possible? Looking back at notes, I didn't take a hyrometer reading of the finished wort, but I did write down a reading of the first runnings off the sparge, at 1.078, and I suspect everything seemed so normal that I either didn't take or didn't record readings of the final runnings off the sparge (can't remember for sure). Anyway, I bottled and tried some yesterday, and can't notice anything seriously amiss with the finished product (it was a quasi-porter). The main thing I'm curious about is the rapid ferment. Was a) my wort much "thinner" than I thought, or b) did the yeast do some miraculous thing, or c) what? Overall, I'm bagging Wyeast 1098. I wanted it because it's supposedly good down to about 55F (which is where my brewroom is at in the winter), but I've had two weird batches with it. Cheers, Ron Dwelle(dweller at gvsu.edu) "A quart of ale is a dish for a king." -Shakespeare, Winter's Tale Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 08:07:14 +0900 From: bjones at novax.llnl.gov (Bob Jones) Subject: CO2 quick disconnects *** Warning no MaltMill discussions are contained in this post **** wyatt at Latitude.COM asks about Quick Disconnects for CO2. I use air disconnects. You can get these at most large hardware stores. I think they are mostly used for high pressure air quick disconnects. I use them everywhere in my system. There is a male piece and a female piece. The female piece seals when disconnected. The male piece is cheap, the female piece is the expensive one. Check you local hardware store for price. Here is a short summary of where I use them. Maybe you can get some ideas. * Male on CO2 tank, at output of regulator. I also have a checkvalve right before the male connector. * Male on sanke beer tap. * Female on gas line to frig. * Female on CP filler. * Female on gas line to hose assembly for pushing beer from my fermenter. * Female on short hose I use to artificial carbonate beer in corni. kegs. As you can see I like'em alot. By using these connectors, you can have alot more flexability in how you use your CO2 tank. Here is another mind expanding ascii graphic of my draft system gas plumbing FYI. gas CO2 tank manifold (outside frig) ||--cv--Reg--------qd || reg O|O-cv-m f-------||--cv--Reg--------qd | || |-----| ||--cv--Reg--------qd | | || | | ||--cv--Reg--------qd f=female CO2 disconnect | | || m=male CO2 disconnect | | ||--cv--Reg--------qd cv= check valve | | Reg=low pressure regulator | | all the above stuff is qd=CO2 disconnect(corni) ------- located in the frig. I can adjust the dispensing pressure on any one of my kegs to just the right dispensing pressure. The check valves at the gas manifold are needed to prevent any cross coupling of smells and pressures between kegs. I picked up secondary gas regulators surplus from C&H sales(1-800-325-9465), they are $12 each. They have a 0-60psi range and include a pressure gauge. Stock number RG9350. Call and ask for their cataloge. I won't bring my draft system to Denver, Bob Jones bjones at novax.llnl.gov Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 11:16:22 -0400 From: "Anton Verhulst" <verhulst at decvax.dec.com> Subject: Bentonite - really works A recent 10 gallon batch of Kolsch, split in to two 5 gallon fernenters simply would not clear. I'd used Irish Moss but only as an after thought in the last 5 minutes of the boil without hydrating it first - not enough. Anyway... Since I had 2 identical 5 gallon batches in secondary, I had an opertunity to experiment. I fined one carboy with Polyclar and the other with Bentonite. Twenty four hours later, the Bentonite carboy had cleared competely and was ready for kegging. The Polyclar was totally ineffective (for this particular haze, anyway). The Polyclar cost me ninety five (US) cents for the 5 gallon batch, the Bentonite cost me four cents. Bentonite is easily sterilized by boiling. Boiling melts Polyclar and so sterilization is a real pain. Although most HB books mention Bentonite, only Miller actually provided instructions. He suggests adding 2 ounces to 4 cups of water, and then using 2 tablespoons of this slurry per batch. Since I rarely fine in secondary, I didn't want a quart of this liquid hanging around for a couple of years and decided to mix it on a per use basis. I calculated that the 2 tablespoons of the above came out to 2 grams of dry Bentonite per batch (I paid US $2.00 for 224 grams (8 oz.)). The 2 grams conveniently came out to 1/2 teaspoon so those without a scale, don't dispair :-). Bentonite is a clay and is sold in a dried state. When you dump it in water, it becomes wet clay, with all of its marvelous physical properties - it becomes a gelatinous mess. The trick to using the stuff is to get it mixed with water and avoiding the mess. For this you need a blender. Add about a cup of warm water to the blender and start it a slow speed. While the blender is running, slowly add the 1/2 tsp of Bentonite and let if go for about a minute. Be sure the blender is running when you add the Bentonite. If it's not, the clay will stick to the bottom and you'll need to take it apart for cleaning. The now stable (more of less) slurry is now ready for sterilization. Simply boil it for 15 minutes. An Erlenmeyer flask wih an aluminum foil cover works real well but anything will do. After it cools, its ready to use by simply pouring it into the carboy and mixing. Bentonite has been used for many years by home wine makers but, for some reason, brewers have pretty much ignored it. Give it a try the next time you need to fine in secondary. It works, it's easy to sterilize, and it's rediculously cheap. - --Tony Verhulst Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 11:23:17 -0400 From: Dan Beauvais <beauvais at bbt.com> Subject: re: beginner's primary fermentation question - --- in HBD #1434 Karl Elvis MacRae <kmac at cisco.com> asks... > > I'm wondering if my firmentation > is stalling out. > > I pitched my yeast Sunday evening. By Tuesday morning, it was > bubbling so hard the lock sounded lick a ticking clock. This > went on all day tuesday. > > But by wednesday, it had slowed WAY down, and now, (Noon Thursday), > it's just producing one bubble every 1-2 minutes. > > Is this a normal rate? Or is it stalling? > > My yeast was very fresh (Wyeast american ale yeast), and I'm fermenting at room tempreature> It sounds perfectly normal to me. Wait until there is less than one bubble in four minutes, (Saturday maybe?) and you are ready to bottle. In three weeks, you'll realize that there was nothing to worry about. Enjoy -- and congrats on the new baby! - --- Dan Beauvais beauvais at bbt.com BroadBand Technologies, Inc. phone: +1 919/405-4630 4024 Stirrup Creek Drive, PO Box 13737 fax: +1 919/405-4511 Research Triangle Park, NC 27709-3737 - --- Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 09:35:05 -0500 (CDT) From: Allen Ford <allen at darwin.sfbr.org> Subject: Stirred mashes The recent discussions concerning the construction of a motor-driven paddle for continuously stirring mashes has me wondering how the small-scale commercial brewers do it. I don't recall seeing any devices for mash-stirring in the tuns of any of the brewpubs or micros that I have visited. What is mash-stirring supposed to do for you? Is mash-stirring better suited to certain beer styles or grain types? Any comments on the advantages and/or disadvantages of stirred mashes for the small-scale commercial or home brewery would be appreciated. Jack S. writes: > I have the additional problem of needing to keep clear of the EASYMASHER and > this may preclude it from working at all. With a false bottom, you would not have this problem. The dinosaur raises its ugly head. =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= Allen L. Ford <allen at darwin.sfbr.org> =-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-= =-=-= Southwest Foundation for Biomedical Research San Antonio, Texas =-=-= Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 11:33:59 -0400 (EDT) From: Jim Busch <busch at daacdev1.stx.com> Subject: RE:quicks and weizens > Subject: Quick Disconnect for CO2 Rapids sells these, so does Foxx. > Steve writes: > Subject: Infusion mashing a Weizen? > > The release of the (relatively) new Wyeast 3068 Weizen yeast has gotten me > interested in attempting a Bavarian Weizen beer. But, to date I have only > done single infusion mashing. I am aware that Eric Warner's book implies > that decoction mashing is required for a good weizen. I am also aware that > a protein rest is recommended for mashes with wheat malt. I would like to > avoid the hassle of decoction or step mashing (I mash in a cooler). Has > anyone tried making a Bavarian Weizen with a single step infusion mash? Any > thoughts on how this might turn out? I'm not trying to make an award > winning beer, just a good clovey weizen. Should I give it a try? Thanks. > FYI, Eric does not decoct his Weizen made at his brewery, Tabernash. Just goes to show what happens when theory meets practice/budget. Its still a good idea to use protein rests with a weizen, and becomes more important as the wheat percentage rises above 50%. In your case, I would suggest a 30 min rest at 122F in a very thick mash. Infuse boiling water to raise the temp to conversion. You might still get a thin mash, but you are going to pay a price somewhere in the process if you dont add heat or decoct. You could do a single long mash with a smaller amount of Wheat, like 35-45% but the lauter may still become stuck, depending your tun. Best, Jim Busch Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 10:04:42 MDT From: "Aaron Spurlock" <ams1628 at Slinky.UnivNorthCo.EDU> Subject: Looking for equipment I am looking to purchase used homebrew equipment from anyone willing to part with it. I live in the northern Colorado area, and my friends and I would like to brew more than one batch at a time. We are also looking for any used soda kegs in the same area. Please reply to my directly if you have anything you would like us to buy from you. Thanks for your time and help! Aaron Spurlock ams1628 at slinky.UnivNorthCo.EDU IS Tech ** All opinion expressed are ** University of Northern Colorado ** expressly my opinions!!!! ** Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 10:12:43 MDT From: "Mark B. Alston" <c-amb at math.utah.edu> Subject: British Malt comparison? Does anyone have information about how the various british malts stack up? I have been using M&F pale malt but was unable to find any sources nearby so have purchased Edme pale malt. How do these compare to one another? Is there another British malt I should be searching for instead? Any suggestions or pointers to info would be greatly appreciated. Mark Alston Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 8:50:23 -0400 (EDT) From: KLAY at ocean.aoml.erl.gov Subject: Hopeful end to mill discussions Amen to Rich Scotty! I'm sure many of us would like to see Jack quite down a little on the subject! I'm off to Sweden, Denmark, and Finland. Hopefully by July, another thread will be running, and I'll keep cranking my trusty corona. Cheers! JK "They seek some Hofbrauhaus of the spirit like a grail hold a krug of Munich beer like a chalice." -T. Pinchon Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 12:31:36 -0400 From: matth at bedford.progress.COM Subject: Mills and stouts Two quickies: 1) This MM .vs. GM has gotten really old. It's quite obvious at this point that none of the paries is going to be swayed from their opinions, so why not just drop the issue as a difference of opinion and leave it at that? 2) The real reason I'm posting: I've been brewing for a few years now. Gave a friend a couple of bottles of a stout I made. He thought it was very good and quite drinkable, but even as dark as it was (darkest I've ever made) the mouth-feel, consistency, and pourability of it was still quite light when compared to Guiness. He asked me why and, sadly, I couldn't give him a firm answer. One thought we both vaguely recall reading is the addition of other non-fermentable sugars, such as lactose. Sooooo: a) Do we recall correctly? b) Can anyone give me a firm explanation for him (and me)? Thanks a bunch. Hope everyone has a good long weekend! -Matth Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 11:15:58 -0500 From: jay_weissler at il.us.swissbank.com (Jay Weissler) Subject: another request for spruce beer info I would like to summarize people's experiences in brewing spruce beer. Specifically, I want to know. 1- style of base beer (ex: lager, light ale, etc.) 2- source of spruce (ex: essence, bark or needles from ...,etc.) 3- amount of spruce. 4- when you added it and for how long (mash, boil, fermenter, etc.) 5- your satisfaction with end product. Given the amount of traffic on spruce beer, I know this may seem redundent, but I hope organizing the info this way and filling in the gaps will help identify what really works. Also, I deleted many of the posts before I realized how interested I'ld become in this. TIA Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 09:35:04 -0700 (PDT) From: weix at netcom.com (Patrick Weix) Subject: The yeast faq again!!! (It just keeps getting better) Hello All, Yes, I have sent out the yeast faq once again. The improvements include : 1. Improved ascii formatting(thanks Jeff). Several others have offered me WP, MS Word, or other formatted versions, but this is system independent. 2. Improved spelling. No-one called me on the carpet about my creative spelling, but I corrected most of the mistakes anyway. When Jeff did the ascii format, he Americanized the spellings, and I let it stand. 3. Some actual yeast info!! Got wind of some strains that Brewtek is bringing out this summer. Enjoy. Also, no one has said anything yet, but if you read the table in my recent Zymurgy article very carefully (pg. 50), you will see that the info in some columns got shifted. The managing editor gave me permission to print a correction here, and they will be printing a correction in the Fall issue. I just haven't had time to put it into ascii form--should I post it in Word? Thanks, Patrick "The large print giveth, and the small print taketh away." Tom Waits /------------------------------------------------------------\ | Patrick Weix weix at netcom.com | | UT Southwestern Medical Center weix at swmed.utexas.edu | | 5323 Harry Hines Blvd tel: (214) 648-5050 | | Dallas, TX 75235 fax: (214) 648-5453 | \------------------------------------------------------------/ Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 09:42:17 PDT From: haist at cogsci.UCSD.EDU (Frank Haist) Subject: extraction efficiency (?) Okay, it's time I put this to the collected wisdom of the net. Which type of mill should I buy? Ooops, sorry, didn't mean to ask that one. I'm having what appears to be a consistent problem with mediocre extraction rates, i.e., in the range of 25 or so pts/lb/gal for domestic (Great Western) pale 2-row. I've been using an EASYMASHER installed in my 33-qt kettle with single temp mash at 152-154 F for typically an hour of so. I use a slow sparge in the range of an hour or so with 170F water. It just dawned on me that during my entire all-grain career (very short so far at 5 batches) I've used perhaps an over-abundance of grain in the mash. For example, for a very tasty pale ale I used 9 lbs pale 2 row, 1 lb Munich, and 1lb crystal (crystal at mashout) and achieved an OG at 1.056. One of my questions is could I achieve the same OG by using less grain (I'm asking in anticipation of trying the experiment)? The thought being that during the sparge I'm leaving behind some sugars by the time I get my 6.5 or 7 gallons I use for the boil. So far during sparge the last of the runoff is typically quite clear but ever-so slightly sweet. I've never tested the gravity of the last runoff. What would be a typical target gravity to stop sparging at? A second question is, how much more extraction efficiency could I expect by using a higher quality of pale malt? As always, thanks in advance for any and all help. - ---Frank haist at cogsci.ucsd.edu | There is something fascinating about or | science. One gets such wholesale fhaist at ucsd.edu | returns of conjecture out of such | trifling investment of fact. --M. Twain Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 12:39:22 CDT From: Jeffrey A. Ziehler <ziehler at post.its.mcw.edu> Subject: strange grains Has anyone out there used Qinoa (sp?) (pronounced KEEN-wa) or know about an indigenous brew which does? Jeff Ziehler ziehler at post.its.mcw.edu this weekend: Mead-ola next weekend: IPA bottle soon: porter (sg 1.063) drinking: my Bock (my first all-grain) "This is my best beer yet!" (take 12) Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 26 May 1994 10:58:45 -0700 From: Jim Doyle <jgdoyle at uci.edu> Subject: libel The MM(tm) dude has crossed into the realm of libel now, and I am no longer amused. I (and I doubt I am alone) will not buy any product from NorthEast Brew Supply or Kerry Brown as a direct result of Jack Schmidling's post. Also, I will not buy any JS products (contrary to prior posting) because I am not in the habit of dealing with or promoting companies who blatently trash their competition and admit to withholding one person's pre-payment to pay another person's debts. A prudent person would realize the affects of positive advertising far outweigh the tactics I have been watching for the last week or two. It has been a pretty pathetic show. I feel this way, rich Corinthian leather or not... Now, on to the important stuff- Is it harmful to the beer to take the corny keg into and out of the fri(d)ge? Do the temperature fluctuations change taste? Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 14:02:09 -0400 (EDT) From: Allen Glass <aglass at andy.bgsu.edu> Subject: Hops in training This is only my second post to the MaltMill Digest (the Mill that Saved the Universe!!!!!), so please be gentle with me. I'd love to grow hops next year, but I'm concerned about their height. My best growing location would be near the back fence of my yard, but there's an overhead power line running through. Can hops be trained to grow horizontally, at a height of no more than, say, ten feet? I'd love to try making beer with really fresh hops. Also, I've noticed a few posts mentioning beers being brewed at a wife's request (from our male digesters), and I've noticed that these seem to be somewhat lighter beers. Do those of you who brew specially for a spouse find yourself with a beer you yourself would drink? Just curious; my wife grew up drinking Guiness so I've no need to lighten up. thanks, allen Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 11:08:59 +0800 From: cmm at brewhaus.Eng.Sun.COM (Michael Burgeson) Subject: Re: Quick Disconnect for CO2 > anyone used some kind of quick disconnect fittings mounted in the > refrigerator? It seems to me that there must be fittings like this I have used the standard compressed air quick disconnects. They do make disconnects for CO2; heavy duty, hard to find, mucho denero $$$. The standard compressed air fittings are easy to find and cheap. I can't say _for_sure_ that they don't leak, as I have a very small leak in my system somwhere. I did submerse the fittings; no bubbles, so I don't _think_ it's the quick disconnects. > some one way valves and a splitter inside the refrigerator to supply > gas to multiple kegs. > I would suggest using a manifold with a check valve for each line you want to run inside the fridge. If you use tees, the kegs would all be sharing the same pressure and CO2. It makes a mess of your lines when you (accidentily) plug in a full keg that has higher pressure than the others. Then you have to clean _all_ of your hoses. Also, if one keg has an infection, it could migrate to the other kegs. Putting a check valve on all the CO2 lines in the fridge also allows you to keep the kegs at different pressures, and it isolates them from each other. - --mik Return to table of contents
Date: 27 May 1994 13:21:13 GMT From: "THOMAS L. STOLFI" <OBCTS at CWEMAIL.CECO.COM> Subject: Southport Beer Festival The Southport Beer Festival is scheduled for Saturday June 18 from 2:00PM to 7:00PM. It will be held at Brewmasters Pub in Kenosha, WI located at the intersection of 75th St. & 39th Avenue. I believe there will be 12-15 breweries serving and the cost is $15.00 in advance or $18.00 at the door. The cost also includes a very nice glass beer mug. Tom Stolfi obcts at cwemail.ceco.com Return to table of contents
Date: Mon, 23 May 1994 20:59:19 GMT From: rmoucka at OMN.COM (RONALD MOUCKA) Subject: Spruce Bashing Spruce Bashers: Believe it or not, it is possible to brew a drinkable spruce beer. Thos you who were lucky enough to attend the GABF a couple of years ago will remember Anchor's version of a traditional spruce beer. Yuck! It taste a combination of mint julep (sp?) and Listerine. Six packs of the stuff distributed in a limited area around Denver, and I was stupid enough to couple. At least at the time I thought it was stupid. Not anymore! After two years of aging in the refrigerator, it is now one of the most refreshing, light summer beers I've ever tasted. So don't give up on th spruce beers. They take a long time to mellow, but it's worth the wait. own version of a spruce is coming up on 1 year old this month and is jus starting to taste like something resembling beer. Actually quite good I Good enough that I humbly submit the following recipe for your potential enjoyment: 5lbs 2 row Klages 3lbs 6 row Klages 1lb Crystal 10LV .5lbs Dextrin 1oz Hallertauer 4.9 AAU 60min 4oz fresh blue spruce tips (3-4" long) 60min 1oz fresh blue spruce tips finish 1tsp Irish Moss Wyeast #2035 American Lager OG 1.048 FG 1.014 Temperature controlled step mash. Boil hops and spruce for full 60 minu I might consider dropping the spruce to 3oz next time. Obviously, weath conditions will effect the strength of your spruce. Collect your spruce in the country where you're sure they haven't been sprayed. Never tried extract. Wouldn't have a clue as to how much to add. Most importantly, patient! This stuff takes a looong time. Brew on ronald.moucka at omn.com This message created on OMN BBS (303) 667-1149 data Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 26 May 1994 17:03:46 GMT From: rmoucka at OMN.COM (RONALD MOUCKA) Subject: Spruce Bashing Tried to send this a few days ago, but it seems to have gotten lost. Having a little trouble getting used to a new system Spruce Bashers: Believe it or not, it is possible to brew a drinkable spruce beer. Those of you who were lucky enough to attend the GABF a couple of years ago will remember Anchor's version of a traditional spruce beer. Yuck! It tasted like a combination of mint julep (sp?) and Listerine. Six packs of the stuff were distributed in a limited area around Denver, and I was stupid enough to buy a couple. At least at the time I thought it was stupid. Not anymore! After two years of aging in the refrigerator, it is now one of the most refreshing, light summer beers I've ever tasted. So don't give up on those spruce beers. They take a long time to mellow, but it's worth the wait. My own version of a spruce is coming up on 1 year old this month and is just now starting to taste like something resembling beer. Actually quite good IMHO. Good enough that I humbly submit the following recipe for your potential enjoyment: 5lbs 2 row Klages 3lbs 6 row Klages 1lb Crystal 10LV .5lbs Dextrin 1oz Hallertauer 4.9 AAU 60min 4oz fresh blue spruce tips (3-4" long) 60min 1oz fresh blue spruce tips finish 1tsp Irish Moss Wyeast #2035 American Lager OG 1.048 FG 1.014 Temperature controlled step mash. Boil hops and spruce for full 60 minutes. I might consider dropping the spruce to 3oz next time. Obviously, weather conditions will effect the strength of your spruce. Collect your spruce out in the country where you're sure they haven't been sprayed. Never tried the extract. Wouldn't have a clue as to how much to add. Most importantly, be patient! This stuff takes a looong time. Brew on ronald.moucka at omn.com This message created on OMN BBS (303) 667-1149 data Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 1994 18:05:00 -0400 (EDT) From: David Lambermont <LAMBERMONTDB%A1%PRTOAX at mr.ctd.ornl.gov> Subject: Mash Newbie Questions Hello all, I've been brewing for about 5 years now, but I just recently attempted my first mash (partial). I mashed on my stove, and ran into all sorts of problems. I have an electric range, and I had virtually no temperature control -- the mash temperature would drop, I'd add a little heat and over shoot the target temp. by 5-10 degrees, I'd panic and pull the pot off of the stove, the temperature plummeted, and I started the cycle over again. I also found that the mash temperature varied wildly depending on where I inserted the thermometer. The batch is sitting in my lagering fridge now, and after all of my problems, the mash converted and my O.G. was right on target. The rest will be answered in a few months... I guess my questions are: 1. What is the best way to control mash temperature? I do have a cooler that I bought specifically for mashing, but nearly every recipe that I have calls for step temperature adjustments... Is there a formula for calculating the amount of X degree water to add to Y amount of mash to achieve a specific target temp? 2. What is the best type of thermometer to use for mashing? Obviously I need something that reacts more quickly than my standard floater. 3. Do the propane fired burners help stabilize temps? 4. Anyone have any good single infusion recipies? Also, is there anyone out there receiving HBD through the Internet->Fidonet gateway? I sent a subscribe message a few weeks ago and received ONE HBD (broken up into 6 messages) and that's all she wrote... Thanks in advance. David Lambermont lambermontdb at ornl.gov --OR-- sysop at f140.n2220.z1.fidonet.org Return to table of contents
Date: Fri, 27 May 94 15:59:28 PDT From: kens at berlioz.nsc.com (Ken Schroeder) Subject: Flavors of Munich and Vienna Malts Hi Brewers, Can anyone tell me the difference between the flavors Munich and Vienna Malts? The SRM and yield numbers are easy to get, but a flavor profile is a much different thing. In fact if anyone has a general flavor profile chart, that would be interesting, maybe even worth posting. Since mash techniques has some influance, I do a 10gal. h20 infusion and straight heat, all grain mash. I vary between step and single infusion depending on what I'm brewing. Private posts may be sent to kens at lan.nsc.com. Please be patient, my network is being reconfigured this weekend and I expect some hangups. TIA --- Hoppy Brewing, Ken Schroeder Return to table of contents
End of HOMEBREW Digest #1435, 05/28/94