Homebrew Digest Tuesday, 15 October 1996 Number 2230

[Prev HBD] [Index] [Next HBD] [Back]


   FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES
        Mike Donald, Digest Janitor-in-training
        Thanks to Rob Gardner for making the digest happen!

Contents:
  potentially weak beer (Matt Wise)
  Light and Mead (Michael Caprara)
  summary of posts on infection/off flavors ("Ray Robert")
  Saranac Pale Ale (Michael Gerholdt)
  British IPA (andy anderson)
  energizer bunny yeast (AJN)
  The gravity of molasses... (Kirk Boley)
  re: SS Tanks ("Palmer.John")
  Galveston Brewing Company ((John Taylor))
  brew in tallahassee/dateline ("Ted Hull")
  RE: Wild Hops, RedHook, Dateline ("Gregory, Guy J.")
  Chilling (TheTHP at aol.com)
  Papazian Palace Bitter recipe (edyaz at epix.net)
  Re: Dateline NBC piece  (Scott Murman)
  Re: Wyeast info on Web (Mark Warrington)
  Chest Freezers (Ken Sullivan)
  A really cool immersion wort chiller I made (Ken Sullivan)
  Ca in PU (Jim Busch)
  sorry, George (Michael Gerholdt)
  Blue Moon, etc. (WayneWaan at aol.com)
  Acidifying lager mash (Alex Santic)
  Maple Ale or Stout ("V.J. Mitchell")
  Marris Otter Pale Ale Malt ("Brian Krause")
  Hard Cider ((Mark Andrizzi))
  chocolate beer (bob rogers)
  Sorghum Report: Part A (Michael Gerholdt)

For SUBMISSIONS to be published, send mail to: homebrew at aob.org For (UN)SUBSCRIBE requests, send mail to: homebrew-digest-request@ aob.org and include ONLY subscribe or unsubscribe in the BODY of the message. Please note that if subscribed via BEER-L, you must unsubscribe by sending a one line e-mail to listserv at ua1vm.ua.edu that says: UNSUB BEER-L If your address is changing, please unsubscribe from the old address and then subscribe from the new address. If your account is being deleted, please be courteous and unsubscribe first. For technical problems send e-mail to the Digest Janitor, homebrew-digest-owner at aob.org. OTHER HOMEBREW INFORMATION http://www.aob.org/aob - The AHA's web site. http://alpha.rollanet.org - "The Brewery" and the Cat's Meow Archives. info at aob.org - automated e-mail homebrewing information. ARCHIVES: At ftp.stanford.edu in /pub/clubs/homebrew/beer via anonymous ftp. Also http://alpha.rollanet.org on the web and at majordomo at aob.org by e-mail. COPYRIGHT: As with all forums such as this one, copyrights are retained by the original authors. In accordance with the wishes of the members of the Homebrew Digest, posts to the HBD may NOT be sold or used as part of a collection that is sold without the original authors' consent. Copies may ONLY be made available at no charge and should include the current posting and subscription addresses for the HBD.
---------------------------------------------------------------------- From: Matt Wise <matt.wise at kwsoft.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 08:37:34 -0400 Subject: potentially weak beer This weekend I started a batch of apple beer. I modified the recipe = ("apples in the snow" from Cat's Meow) to work with the ingredients on = hand. Now that is fermenting, I am afraid it will be weak tasting and = have a low alcohol content. The OG is only 1.032. Would it help to add = some malt extract (or even corn sugar) prior to a secondary = fermentation? I am afraid the yeast will consume all of the sugars and = leave me with a "dry" tasting beer. I am not sure what type of yeast I = have. It came w/ a Munton & Fister "Old Ale" kit that I used in the = recipe. I would appreciate if anyone could tell me more about this = yeast. Maybe I should have asked some of this stuff prior to starting = the batch. In case you haven't guessed, I am almost a newbie. Thanks, Matt Return to table of contents
From: Michael Caprara <mcaprara at awwarf.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 09:16:05 -0600 Subject: Light and Mead Hello All! I have a question about storing meads and ciders. I have a space above my kitchen cabinets that will allow for some wine racks. I would like to store some of my meads and ciders up there. Is there a problem with sunlight and flourescent light hitting meads and ciders? All of the bottles are corked and will lay on their sides. My kitchen gets DIRECT sunlight first thing in the morning. I have a flourescent fixture on the ceiling of my kitchen. Thanks in advance for the info. Email me at mcaprara at awwarf.com Brewfully Deadicated MC Return to table of contents
From: "Ray Robert" <Ray_Robert at bah.com> Date: 14 Oct 1996 11:32:29 U Subject: summary of posts on infection/off flavors This is a summary of the tips from my recent question re: infections/off flavors Some of these are direct quotes others are summarized. 1. clean [equipment] after use....store until needed...clean again ...sanitise (with bleach solution 1T/g) and rinse 4 times with preboiled water (allow to cool to 160F+. ) (?) 2. Replace the fermenter. Plastic scratches easily. Scratches can harbor bacteria and keep the sanitizing solution away from them. (Spencer and others) 3. Sterilize the copper tube by baking it at 300F for 30 minutes. (Spencer) 4. put the immersion coil in the wort several minutes before knockout in order to sanitise it. Check for possibility of an immersion coil leak or drip into the wort (Steve A) 5. Dust from crushed grain is a great source of bacteria - try to keep the grist dust away from the wort. Bacteria can easily get airborne. Avoid air drafts around the sterile boiled wort and clean primary. (Steve A) 6. Try a thorough cleaning before brew day. Clean whatever is overhead - a stove vent fan or whatever. Mop down the floors and counter surfaces if you can with a dilute clorox solution or similar sanitizer, and pour some down any nearby drains - bacteria thrive in drain traps. Don't raise an excessive amount of 'dust' on brewing day. (Steve A) 7. After the wort cooling begins, put on a pair of 'kitchen' rubber gloves and wipe or soak the surface with sanitizer. (Steve A) 8. Use a paper face mask when replicating yeast cultures (Steve A) 9. don't suck-start any syphon. If you can pre-fill the syphon with pre-boiled water and pinch the end, then insert the end into the container ... (Steve A) 10. Always boil your priming sugar (many) 11. Always use a starter. If your starter has problems you don't have to pitch it (many) 12. Sanitize anything that has gone into or come from the fridge. large potential for bacterial infection (several) 13. Watch the ferment temps closely. Maintain temp range for the yeast you are using. (many) 14. "One thing I noticed is that you only mashed 1 hour at 150F. This is quite short for a 150F mash. I recommend increasing that to 2 hours and see if the haze goes away. It could be starch haze. Also, if it was not fully converted, the OG would be low and the flavour would be weak. Weak beer does tend to taste a little sour just from the carbonation." (Al K.) Try bottling the yeast slurry from your primary. If the batch is bad throw it out. Other wise keep it in the fridge. To use open the bottle, and extract 5ml of slurry. Add this to a starter and recap the rest of the slurry. You can keep yeast going for years this way. (?) (If I missed an attribution, I apologize. The volume of email on this was tremendous) Many thanks to the following for their private emails: Steve Alexander Bob Bessette Tom Herlache Mark Lindberg Sara&Rod Jim booth Spencer Thomas brian (b.j.) grier Dave Greenbaum Al Korzonas SMurman Alex Santic Regards Robert ray_robert at bah.com Return to table of contents
From: Michael Gerholdt <gerholdt at ait.fredonia.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 96 13:17:55 -0500 Subject: Saranac Pale Ale Bill Watt wrote: >> I would like to cast my vote (election day nears) for a favorite IPA. although not called IPA, Saranac Pale Ale is certainly way up there on the hoppiness scale. It is brewed by F.X.Matt in Utica, NY and is well worth a taste if you can get it in your area. For info on the Saranac line visit www.saranac.com I found this address under their bottle caps. No affiliation, yadda,etc. << respondo: The Saranac Pale Ales are pretty good. There are two, both labeled "Traditional." One has Kent Goldings and Fuggles hops; the other, Kent Goldings and Cascades. The yeast appears to be the same. I prefer the Pale Ale with the Cascades; the hops are a bit more pronounced. Look on the neck label for info on which one you are purchasing. I don't think it is quite "big enough" to qualify as an India Pale Ale, however; at least, that's not what occurs to me as I drink it. Just a pretty good Pale Ale. (All things are relative; there is no comparison between this and SNPA, for example. But given what's on the shelves at Quality or Tops, Saranac's is definitely not depressing.) ************* Guy Gregory wrote earlier: >> OK, so Bass isn't actually an IPA, but I like it. I have driven, in the late 70's or early 80's, about 60 miles to have one from a tap, and pay the princely sum of 2.50 per pint at the time for the pleasure.... << respondo I used to like Bass, and think it good. Either it has changed, or I have (and I know I have, but maybe we *both* have?). After not tasting it for a bit over a year, I had a bottle a couple months ago and it was all I could do to get through it. Tasted brown sugary, strange. Certainly not like an IPA, and not even like what I consider a pale ale. Complained to the barkeep , who cracked another bottle for the house taster. He said it tasted "normal" to him. I poured some out of his bottle into a glass and it was the same as mine. Not skunky, just bad. I'll never ask for another Bass unless I'm somewhere that has it on tap and they give out free samplers. YUK!!!! - -- Return to table of contents
From: andy anderson <andy at dnaandfp.demon.co.uk> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 14:01:08 +0100 Subject: British IPA Greetings, Uh-oh, here's where I get into trouble by lurching out of lurker mode. And given the quantity of HBD these days, my response will undoubtedly be OBE by the time it reaches your screen. Nevertheless ... "Dave Hinkle" <Dave.Hinkle at aexp.com> writes on the subject of IPA: >Maybe the question is best answered at the source of this style. >Help me out here Brits, but in my travels through England, I don't >recall ever seeing an IPA in a pub. IPA style was originated in >England, but are there any contemporary commercial examples >still produced there? Especially, anything in bottles that we Yanks >might be able to get a hold of? To give you some background, I'm not a Brit, but an American who has been living in England for the past two years. As a homebrewer in the U.S. I have made numerous American Pale Ales (APA), and as an imbiber in England, I've sampled just about everything I could find, including British India Pale Ales (IPA). We all know the story of the original IPA's, the long transit times to India, the wreck of an East Indiaman on English shores, and the resulting demand for IPA on English shores. However, that is the past. The IPA which is the hearty, hoppy, and strong ale-of-choice of hopheads the world over can only be found in the U.S. Here in Britain, there are some IPA's to be found, but in general they are lower in alcohol than even the normal bitter. A typical English IPA will have an OG of around 1.038 with a bitterness of around 15-20 IBU's (my estimation of IBU's). Over here, the term IPA is used more for marketing purposes than as a style description. In fact if you enter a pub and find an IPA on draft, the landlord is usually advertising it as the cheapest ale on the premises (that's because it's one-step removed from water, IMHO). There are occasionally micro-brewers which offer a stronger, hoppier IPA, but it is usually marketed as a throw-back to the days of old and is only a seasonal beer. These days, the only time I buy a pint of IPA in England is if it is one I've never tried before. Invariably it is also the last pint of that particular IPA which I order. So, unless you are reviewing 150-year old brewing texts, stop looking to England for information on the creation of IPA. The U.S. is where you will find the closest thing to the IPA's of old. Cheers, Andy - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Work EMail address: andy at dnaandfp.demon.co.uk Home EMail address: andy at fpusa.demon.co.uk - --------------------------------------------------------------------- Return to table of contents
From: AJN <neitzkea at frc.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 11:04:01 -0400 (EDT) Subject: energizer bunny yeast A few days ago, I posted that my wheat beer had been in the fermenter almost three weeks, and it was still going. Well, it just pased the three week period. I decided to take a hydrometer reading Saturday, it read 1.000, the problem is... it's still going! I'm using W51, I think. Should I expect it to get to, or go below 1.000? I would be worring right now, but I tasted it, it was flatt but very very good! This *is* the best beer I have ever made. It was like having a mouth full of cloves, not overpowering, but definitly cloves and cloudy too (this I expected). Private e-mail is fine on my question, thanks. _________________________________________________________________________ Arnold J. Neitzke Internet Mail: neitzkea at frc.com Brighton, Mi. Return to table of contents
From: Kirk Boley <Kirk.Boley at vmic.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 12:42:34 -0500 Subject: The gravity of molasses... Hi all, I'm making a holiday spiced beer which is happily fermenting as we read. One of the ingredients I used was a pint of natural (no sulfur, no preservatives) blackstrap molasses. My question: Does anyone have any idea what this contributed to the OG of my wort? TIA. Kirk Boley kboley at juno.com <--- private replies to this address, please Return to table of contents
From: "Palmer.John" <palmer at ssdgwy.mdc.com> Date: 14 Oct 1996 09:42:39 U Subject: re: SS Tanks Jeff asks about some Stainless tanks he got from the scrap yard: >The outer shell is 25" tall with a 12" diameter. They >hold about 13 gallons of water. The inside of the tank is stamped with >"059 304 HT92955". What does that mean? (Metallurgists?) Well, I am not positive, but this lots to me like the Heat Lot code. 304 is the alloy, its what all sanitary stainless tanks are made of. HT probably stands for Heat Treat but I doubt that the rest of the number is the date, 9/29/55 would be a bit old, even for a scrap yard. The 059 might be part of an overall code, indicating the batch of steel that this tank was produced from. Sounds like a great deal! John John J. Palmer - Metallurgist for MDA-ISS M&P johnj at primenet.com Huntington Beach, California Palmer House Brewery and Smithy - www.primenet.com/~johnj/ Return to table of contents
From: jltaylor at ix.netcom.com (John Taylor) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 17:55:14 GMT Subject: Galveston Brewing Company This weekend I had the chance to tour Galveston Brewing Company. The Oatmeal Stout that I had was GREAT. The equipment that they use, converted dairy equipment, was interesting to look at. The converstions might give me some ideas for the future. (Where is that ad for the local welding school). - -------------------------------------------- John Taylor [JLTaylor at ix.netcom.com] Brew Stud pico-Brewery Austin, Texas <<Cofounder>> Specializing in hand crafted ales & meads Return to table of contents
From: "Ted Hull" <THull at brwncald.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 96 7:27:04 EDT Subject: brew in tallahassee/dateline howdy, just wanted to let the collective know about a great *little* place to get a beer in tallahassee, florida. it's called the leon pub, and it's on 6th street. i was there visiting saturday and was quite impressed. the booth behind me was full of chefs from local restaurants talking about mashing pumpkin (the general comment was that it's a PITA). the barmaid was a bit gruff, and she apparently cares more about the beer at times than the customers, but what a selection! i enjoyed my first anchor old foghorn (on tap, no less), but all told the selection filled and entire page in small type. and the prices were excellent, with most beers for $3 or less. give it a try if you get an opportunity. also, i got back just in time to catch the dateline story. did stone(d) phillips mention at the end that all budweiser says st. louis, missouri on the label? if not, they probably deserve some nasty email for being a bit biased in their coverage. and i'm sure a-b is just concerned about the customer's well-being. yeah, right. ted hull atlanta, ga Return to table of contents
From: "Gregory, Guy J." <GGRE461 at ecy.wa.gov> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 96 11:03:00 PDT Subject: RE: Wild Hops, RedHook, Dateline jander <jander at wasatch.com> in his Wild Hops Recap notes the bad news:: "definitely not for use as flavor or aroma hops -- a definite grassy smell reminiscent of alfalfa; and 2) I wound up with a *lot* of "brainy" material in the cooled wort. " I don't know about the "brainy" material, but I had a grassy smell from some homegrown Northern Brewer hops this year. I picked three varieties, and ceased drying the NB's first, because they seemed "ready". Well, after freezing, they reminded me of a hayfield, grassy and dank, while the varieties which dried another day have excellent hop character. Perhaps they didn't get dry? - Michael Caprara <mcaprara at awwarf.com> states categorically, regarding Blue Moon: "Hey, just because it is brewed by Coors doesn't mean it is not good. Besides, Red Hook is Budweiser...." Red Hook is brewed by the Red Hook Brewery in Seattle. I think their building another one back in the non-cascade hop east somewhere. Red Hook, to my knowledge, is most assuredly not Budweiser, though AB does own some of the company. I have detected no loss in quality since AB bought some stock. No interest, just a satisified consumer, blah, blah. The Dateline article on this topic was hardly news to many of us. I guess I agree with the Micro's and AB on this, that the brewery of origin should be on the bottle. I do not find it suprising, though, that megabreweries can make good beer. What I find suprising is that it took so long for the MBA's that run these outfits to realize that good beer is good, and people will drink it. I look forward to Bud labeling each beer to it's specific brewery of origin as well, not just a litany of each of their breweries on the label. Hopefully, one day, they will produce vast quantities of beer that tastes good. Wow. BTW, Bud's date of birth advertising is kinda catchy, isn't it? It ain't enough to make me buy one, though. cheers GuyG4 at aol.com Guy Gregory Lightning Creek Home Brewery Fell off the barley truck last week, Beer born yesterday Return to table of contents
From: TheTHP at aol.com Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 11:52:00 -0400 Subject: Chilling Greetings all Ye Knowledgable Masses, I have a question. Is adding my 2.5 gal of nearling boiling Wort to 2.5 gal cold water and then chilling the entire 5 gal the best way to go? What effect does this have on the wort? Chilling the 2.5 gal of hot wort and adding that to the cold water be less rough on the beer. Is this beneficial? Background info: I am a partial mash/extract brewer (not for much longer: ) My current batch is a Nut brown ale My brew pot is only 3 gal My current process it to gently & carefully pour Hot wort into a 5 gal pale with 2.5 gal of cold water. the pale has a tap, to which is attached flexible tubing which is attached to a 25 ft copper coil. the coil rests 20 lb of Ice, sprinkled with road salt, and toped off with water. Wort flows through ciller into a few more inches of flexible tubing and into the neck of my 5 or 6.5 gal fermenter. Usually comes out at a convienent 68 degrees or below in winter time. Comments and suggestions appreciated. Thanks Phil Wilcox Poison Frog Home Brewery Home of KneeDeep Ale and Dart Frog Dortmunder Return to table of contents
From: edyaz at epix.net Date: Mon, 14 Oct 96 12:04:06 PDT Subject: Papazian Palace Bitter recipe Over the weekend I made a the Palace Bitter from The New Complete Joy of Homebrewing. I'm just over 48 hours past brewing, and the beer is definitely in active fermentation (My blow hose passes air bubbles ever 2 seconds.), however there is no kraeusen to be seen. The carboy shows some residual foam, but only 1-2 inches. I know that bitters can have a tendency to stay a little flat, but I expected more foam than this. Has anyone else had a similar situation with the Palace Bitter. I used a dry ale yeast and followed the recipe exactly, except for 1 lb. crystal male instead of 12 oz. Feel free to answer here or direct private email to edyaz at epix.net. Thanks. - ------------------------------------- Name: Edward T. Yashinsky E-mail: edyaz at epix.net Date: 10/14/96 Time: 12:04:07 PM This message was sent by Chameleon - ------------------------------------- Return to table of contents
From: Scott Murman <smurman at best.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 11:08:31 -0700 Subject: Re: Dateline NBC piece On Sun, 13 Oct 1996 21:51:36 -0400 MrMike656 at aol.com wrote: > > I hope you caught the Jim Koch bash on Dateline NBC on this past Sunday. I caught it by accident. While I agree with you that it was a biased piece, I did find one fact disturbing. When discussing Oregon Brewing Co., and unit I have absolutely no love or respect for, lo and behold they are actually owned by Jim Koch and the Boston Brewing Co. Now if this isn't intentionally trying to mislead the consumer using false labeling than what is? (For those of you geographically challenged, Oregon Brew is a yuppie brew that is totally a marketing gimmic. The beer isn't even very good. Somewhat like a certain Boston Lager). If these quasi-investigative reporters had spent more time on the implications of that, they might have been more effective convincing people there's something fishy in Boston. SM Return to table of contents
From: Mark Warrington <76322.2102 at CompuServe.COM> Date: 14 Oct 96 15:09:29 EDT Subject: Re: Wyeast info on Web <From: Charles Capwell <chas at A119019.sat1.as.crl.com> <Date: Sat, 12 Oct 1996 22:17:18 -0500 (CDT) <Subject: Wyeast Page? < <I was just curious, does Wyeast(or any other yeast producer) have a homepage? <Or is there another source for info on Wyeast on the 'net? I'm asking 'cause <I've got 20 megs of space to fill with web stuff and if there isn't a <comprehensive listing of Wyeast products out there, I thought I'd take up part <of it with the data off a Wyeast paphlet I have here. And if there are others <who have similar data for other yeast producers I'd gladly put it up there, <too. That is providing you mail/fax me a copy of it. :> < <I have done a search on Alta Vista and Yahoo for Wyeast and came up <effectivley empty handed. (There were some references but mainly to web <order forms). < <- -Chas <(chas at crl.com) Try the following URL for Wyeast info: http://www.homebrew.inter.net/homebrew/wyeast.html Everything you could want to know! Mark Warrington Tri-State Brewers http://users.aol.com/tristateb/welcome.html (until the Brewery account we have at http://alpha.rollanet.org/~tristate/welcome.html gets back up for updated web pages) Return to table of contents
From: Ken Sullivan <kj at nts.gssc.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 13:47:31 -0600 Subject: Chest Freezers >Mike wrote asking if anyone had experience with lagering in a chest freezer... Well a quick story.. After telling my wife I could get started homebrewing for only $50 ;-) I walked out of the homebrew shop with the beginners complete kegging system! ($400) only to find out that scince it was the beginning of summer, I couldn't brew lagers (the wife's favorite). I then begged and convinced her that we had to buy a chest freezer! We bought a GE 8.5 cu.ft. chest freezer and hooked up a Hunter AirStat controller. Cost was about $325 for the freezer. If you have the space, get a bigger one. I can fit 1 carboy and 2 corny kegs and about 2 cases on the shelf. Make that only one case on the shelf. The unit is very quiet, doesn't run very often because the lowest temp the AirStat will reach is 39-40F. I have made some pretty awesome Amber Wheat Lagers with it!! Empty, I can pick it up by myself. I love having the chest freezer! I wish it was bigger or had the capability for 2 separate compartments and temperatures. Maybe, I'll just buy another one ;-) Enjoy! KJ Return to table of contents
From: Ken Sullivan <kj at nts.gssc.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 14:02:14 -0600 Subject: A really cool immersion wort chiller I made Hi all, Get out your propane torch, copper pipe and pipe cutters! I designed and made a truly great wort chiller! The design uses 50' of 1/2" copper pipe. I started by winding 4 spirals of copper pipe that would just fit into my 5 gallon SS pot. Each of the spirals connects to a manifold pipe for both the water in and water out. For the manifold, I used straight 3/4" copper pipe with tees and end caps. Each manifold has a hose connection. I attached each spiral to sit at a different level in the brew pot, so one sits on the bottom, then another about 2" above that and so on. The top spiral sits just below the top of a 4.5 gallon brew. I have timed the chilling and can easily drop boiling wort to 70F in 10 mins by gently lifting the chiller 1/2" up and down. There is enough space in the center of the spirals to drop in a hop bag for the aroma addition during cooling. Best of all, no solder connections ever come in contact with the wort. To attach the two manifolds and hose connections together, I wrapped copper wire around them numerous times and then soldered the wire to the chiller. One tight custom unit! KJ Return to table of contents
From: Jim Busch <busch at eosdev2.gsfc.nasa.gov> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 16:20:10 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Ca in PU Joe asks: <Jim Busch - can you help out does Pils Urq. add more all along <the way, to the water, mash, sparge and kettle...? I think AJ deLange may be a better source of this info, but as I understand they do not add calcium to any portion of the brewing process. If anyone knows better please speak up, but this is what I have understood to be the practice. Very long acid rests to bring the pH down. Jim Busch See Victory Brewing at: http://www.victorybeer.com/ Return to table of contents
From: Michael Gerholdt <gerholdt at ait.fredonia.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 96 17:24:17 -0500 Subject: sorry, George I recently posted that I found a statement written by George De Piro to be patronizing. It's the truth ... I do. However, I have always found George's posts illuminating and helpful, and his attitude friendly.I didn't intend my remarks to be a personal slam, though that's the way they sound. My spell checker works ok but I need an update on my attitude checker. There is quite a bit of nitpicking here and I didn't mean to add to that ... guess I did though. Apologies to all for that. - -- Return to table of contents
From: WayneWaan at aol.com Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 17:35:05 -0400 Subject: Blue Moon, etc. As the former Brewmaster of the SandLot Brewery at Coors Field I can give you all the definitive word on the Blue Moon Brews. The recipes are all the work of Dr. Keith Villa, who works in Brewing Research and Development at Coors Brewing Co. in Golden. The first few beers released were mostly Keith's ideas. Blue Moon Brewing Co. is a part of Unibev, which is the specialty beer marketing division of Coors. Jim Sabia, who is the brand manager for Blue Moon, is now telling Keith what to make based on marketing surveys. "If such and such sells make a beer like it." The first commercial example of the Blue Moon Belgian Wit was brewed an the SandLot Brewery under the name of Belly Slide Belgian Wit. All of the R&D on the product however, was done in Golden in the pilot brewery and in the Micron brewery, which is what Brewing R&D call their five gallon brewery. Blue Moon Brewing Co. uses a Denver, CO address because that is where the SandLot Brewery is located and is, of cource, owned by Coors. Unibev has just taken over control of the SandLot Brewery from Brewing R&D, which is why I am now unemployed, and will probably be making more Blue Moon products down there. The SandLot Brewery is just a 10 bbl brewhouse, so it cannot make any beer for sale outside of the restaurant adjacent to it, which is owned by the Rockies and ARAMARK, who operates all the concessions for Coors Field. At first, all the Blue Moon beers were made by F.X. Matt, but now all are made by Hudepohl-Schoenling in Cincinnati. I believe that they may expand to a brewer in the Pacific NW, either Ranier or Blitz-Weinhardt. There should be a release of the Harvest Pumpkin Ale out now and, in development, are another fruit beer and another Belgian-Style ale. As far as the thread about IPA's go, there is nothing wrong with American hops in an IPA!!!! I won two gold medals at the GABF for my Vail Pale Ale which just used Centennials and Cascades. Most British brewers have become too afraid of hops lately and it is up to American Brewers to help them along the way. A couple of years ago Thom Thomlinson (Tom Cat Brewing) and Garret Oliver (Brooklyn Brewing) went over to the UK to teach a course on IPA!!! There is the style known as English-Style Pale Ale for those that care for English hops. An IPA ,in my mind, should be a pale (little to no caramel malt) very bitter (60-75 IBU) slightly high gravity(1.060 to 1.070) ale. What hops and malt used should be up to the brewer!! A wonderfull example from Colorado Springs uses Southern Cross hops from New Zealand. Vail Pale Ale started at 1.060 and had 63 IBU. I used 4 hop additions in the kettle, at 90min., 30min, 10min, and at the end of the boil. I also dry-hopped with whole cone hops for 3 weeks to get the aroma I feel an IPA needs. My favorite IPA is, of course, one I brewed myself, but the current brew coming out of Vail isn't too bad, and Anchor Liberty is suberb, if it is fresh. Pints Pub does have Pilsner Urquell on tap and it is as fresh as the one I had in Germany. They are also finally getting their 3 bbl brewery up and running to brew just cask conditioned real ale. Finally if anyone out there is looking for a Brewmaster or a Brewing Consultant I am available just E-Mail me. Thanks for the bandwidth. Wayne Waananen, Littleton, CO Return to table of contents
From: Alex Santic <alex at brainlink.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 17:53:08 -0400 (EDT) Subject: Acidifying lager mash Ive been following this thread with some interest, although it has concerned itself primarily with acidifying the mash using lactic acid. For my first lager, a Bohemian-style Pils, Ive been planning to start with distilled water and add calcium chloride to bring Ca up to 50 ppm. Based on my current understanding, this should have the desired effect on mash pH without compromising the flavor of the brew. - -- Alex Santic - alex at salley.com Silicon Alley Connections, LLC 527 Third Avenue #419 - NYC 10016 - 212-213-2666 - Fax 212-447-9107 http://www.salley.com Return to table of contents
From: "V.J. Mitchell" <VJMitchell at asu.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 16:02:29 -0700 Subject: Maple Ale or Stout I have recently bottled my first batch of homebrew, a nut brown ale. I tasted a fantastic maple stout 8 or 9 years ago in Newfoundland Canada and am very curious about producing a batch of my own. I am also interested in maybe a maple porter or even a maple brown ale. I have read many pieces on using maple syrup, amount vary from 1-2 quarts to 1 - -1 1/2 cups. Any advise would be really appriciated. I want to produce abatch of homebrew to drink not pour over my waffles!! Thanks. Vince Mitchell VJMitchell at asu.edu Return to table of contents
From: "Brian Krause" <bkrause at gwis.com> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 19:35:47 -0400 Subject: Marris Otter Pale Ale Malt This is a multi-part message in MIME format. - ------=_NextPart_000_01BBBA06.E60E7D60 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Fellow Homebrewers... My local homebrew supply store (Grape & Granary, Akron Ohio) told me about a malt called MARRIS OTTER PALE ALE MALT. Was wondering if anyone has had any experience with this malt. It was suggested that it would be a good choice for a Old Style Scotch Ale. - ---- Brian G. Krause - -------- BKRAUSE at GWIS.COM - ------------ "Sit down, take your shoes off, Have a Homebrew!!" - ------=_NextPart_000_01BBBA06.E60E7D60 Content-Type: text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable <html><head></head><BODY bgcolor=3D"#FFFFFF"><p><font size=3D1 = color=3D"#000000" face=3D"Arial">Fellow Homebrewers...<br><br>My local = homebrew supply store (Grape &amp; Granary, Akron Ohio) told me about a = malt called MARRIS OTTER PALE ALE MALT. &nbsp;Was wondering if anyone = has had any experience with this malt. &nbsp;It was suggested that it = would be a good choice for a Old Style Scotch Ale.<br><br>---- = &nbsp;Brian G. Krause<br>-------- &nbsp;<font = color=3D"#0000FF"><u>BKRAUSE at GWIS.COM</u><font = color=3D"#000000"><br>------------ &nbsp;&quot;Sit down, take your shoes = off, &nbsp;Have a Homebrew!!&quot;</p> </font></font></font></body></html> - ------=_NextPart_000_01BBBA06.E60E7D60-- Return to table of contents
From: FelixTKatt at gnn.com (Mark Andrizzi) Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 19:55:19 Subject: Hard Cider Hi All, I know that this is a brewing digest and that I am asking about cider but I figured that this is the best forum for just such a question (at least for my purposes). I have been a homebrewer for over 5 years and do extract and all-grain brewing, and have been a member of this digest for quite some time. I got a wild hair to make hard cider this fall (for the first time) and was wondering as to a "best recipe" that a fellow homebrewer may have used in the past. I have already looked in the Cats Meow, but am looking for a recipe that has been tried and performed by another fellow "lover of wonderful home brewed beers". I would appreciate any recipes that have been used and enjoyed in the past. Feel free to send in private or global post (though I know that many would not necessarily be interested in the recipes). TIA and understand that I already have 5 gallons of fresh Cider and will be performing my magic in the next 48 hours. Mark Andrizzi "Brew Well and Brew Often" Head Brewmeister of homebrewed "Monkey Butt Beers"tm Return to table of contents
From: bob rogers <bob at carol.net> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 1996 20:14:35 -0400 Subject: chocolate beer George De Piro says: > Dale asks about using chocolate and coffee in beer (a la Redhook > double black brewed with Starbucks Coffee-a marketing dream...) > > CRUCIAL things: It's incredibly bitter in a chalky, unpleasant way. > Mash at high temp (156-158F) and use an unattenuative yeast to provide > plenty of residual sweetness to balance and support the chocolate (I my favorite seasoning book: _a_matter_of_taste_ by humphrey 1965 reports that in ancient times, chocolate was balanced with vanilla. the vanilla "brings out the flavor of chocolate and coffee." has anyone tried it in beer?? the proportions used in the mexican drink chocolatl are: 1oz chocolate to 1 teaspoon vanilla. bob: brewing in the heart of the bible belt bob rogers bob at carol.net Return to table of contents
From: Michael Gerholdt <gerholdt at ait.fredonia.edu> Date: Mon, 14 Oct 96 20:09:27 -0500 Subject: Sorghum Report: Part A I am one of the lucky three who received sorghum malt. Here is a progress report. Recently I asked some questions regarding "Ancient Grains" breakfast cereal. This cereal has no oils, dyes or preservatives ... nothing alien to beer except perhaps Sea Salt. The ingredients are organic by California legal standards (no chemical fertilizers/pesticides for three years). Ingredients include spelt, quinoa, kamut and millet, as well as wheat bran, barley flour , barley malt extract and sea salt (last listed). That's it. I figured that since my homebrew supply shop was short on everything in the world at the time, I could use this cereal as a source of grains that might have been used in Africa. Millet is commonly used, as either the base for beer or along with sorghum. So .... I took a couple pounds of mixed pale malts (bottom of the bins, mix and match) to mash with 26 oz of the Ancient Grains ... to provide the enzymes. I mashed low, medium and high for lots of time. Iodine tested positive for starch. I never got rid of starch in this beer. After mashing this stuff for about three hours, I let it sit, to sour. After 24 hours, the sour smell was barely evident. I let it sit another 24 hours, and the sour smell was a bit stronger ... though not overpowering. I heated water, and added the porridge to it, brought it to a boil, then simmered it for about 45 minutes. Cooled to 160 and added the sorghum malt (2 kilos ... 4.4 lb). Mixed and mashed for a long, long time (about 4 hours). When I grabbed the clear liquid at the top, it showed some starch present. When I mixed and tested gruel, it appeared to be pure starch. I added boiled and cooled water to bring the OG down to 1.050. Added some corn sugar to that water. Throughout this process I was careful about general cleanliness bit not about sanitation. I hydrated some Edme yeast and pitched when the temp was at about 108^ F. Because I never boiled the sorghum, wild yeasts and bacteria will join the Edme in fermenting the sugars that are there. The porridge-like affair showed activity about three hours after I pitched the yeast. I will take it still in the primary to the homebrewing club meeting on Wednesday, where I will strain it into a SS kettle and we'll ladel it into glasses to drink. I'll post part B with comments from club members. - -- Return to table of contents