FORUM ON BEER, HOMEBREWING, AND RELATED ISSUES Digest Janitor: janitor@hbd.org *************************************************************** THIS YEAR'S HOME BREW DIGEST BROUGHT TO YOU BY: Northern Brewer, Ltd. Home Brew Supplies http://www.northernbrewer.com 1-800-681-2739 Support those who support you! Visit our sponsor's site! ********** Also visit http://hbd.org/hbdsponsors.html ********* Contents: Re: Star San bubbles in bottles (John Palmer) Re: Star San bubbles in bottles ("Gary Smith") Re: Star San questions (Kent Fletcher) Re: Yeast Wrangling (David Radwin) Fall European Beer Trip ("Fred Waltman") re: Star San question ("Mark Tumarkin") judging comments ("Mark Tumarkin") Corny Poppet Valves (Tony Barnsley) Burner salvaging (R.A.)" <rbarrett at ford.com> RE: giddy ("Steven Parfitt") Pat, pat, pat (Brian Lundeen) Re: Brian's judging story (Bill Wible) List Member ("David Craft") Fw: Star San proposal ("The Madcap")
* * Show your HBD pride! Wear an HBD Badge! * http://hbd.org/cgi-bin/shopping * * Beer is our obsession and we're late for therapy! * Send articles for __publication_only__ to post@hbd.org If your e-mail account is being deleted, please unsubscribe first!! To SUBSCRIBE or UNSUBSCRIBE send an e-mail message with the word "subscribe" or "unsubscribe" to request@hbd.org FROM THE E-MAIL ACCOUNT YOU WISH TO HAVE SUBSCRIBED OR UNSUBSCRIBED!!!** IF YOU HAVE SPAM-PROOFED your e-mail address, you cannot subscribe to the digest as we cannot reach you. We will not correct your address for the automation - that's your job. HAVING TROUBLE posting, subscribing or unsusubscribing? See the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org. The HBD is a copyrighted document. The compilation is copyright HBD.ORG. Individual postings are copyright by their authors. ASK before reproducing and you'll rarely have trouble. Digest content cannot be reproduced by any means for sale or profit. More information is available by sending the word "info" to req at hbd.org or read the HBD FAQ at http://hbd.org. JANITOR on duty: Pat Babcock and Karl Lutzen (janitor@hbd.org)
---------------------------------------------------------------------- Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 21:50:50 -0700 From: John Palmer <jjpalmer at altrionet.com> Subject: Re: Star San bubbles in bottles Gary wonders about the effect of Star San bubbles in his drained, sanitized bottles on his beer's head retention and flavor: I too, was squeamish at one time about this but since I was bottling a friend's beer who had twisted my arm to brew a batch for him, I went ahead and did it like Five Star said to. And you know what? I couldn't taste any difference in the beer, there weren't any carbonation problems, and the head retention was normal! Since then I, and other members of our club, (Crown of the Valley Brewers in Pasadena, CA) have routinely left the bubbles in sanitized carboys and bottles with no problems and no worries. Hope this helps, John John Palmer john at howtobrew.com www.realbeer.com/jjpalmer www.howtobrew.com - the free online book of homebrewing Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 00:06:10 -0500 From: "Gary Smith" <mandolinist at interlync.com> Subject: Re: Star San bubbles in bottles Thanks for the reply, Gad I hate the thought of maybe, just maybe botching 9 gal from my first run of the RIMS. Especially if the botch was during the last step in bacteria control... Of course we won't talk about how I forgot to shut off the valve from the boilkettle to the hlt & added an extra 2 gal of hot water to the mash to dilute it before I boiled cause of siphon action. The wated slipped back & under the false bottom so I didn't see it. I had to boil for an extra 2 hours to get the spec grav back to beer standards... Ah the pleasure of running the first batch with a 1 tier rims setup & answering the myriad questions of an interested nieghbor while discovering my rims nuances. (If he becomes a brewer I'll write it off to 'dues' it was my turn to pay & be happy). Jus' a bit too much bittering but I made it, I'll drink it. Gary KA1J > > Gary wonders about the effect of Star San bubbles in his drained, > sanitized bottles on his beer's head retention and flavor: > I too, was squeamish at one time about this but since I was bottling a > friend's beer who had twisted my arm to brew a batch for him, I went > ahead and did it like Five Star said to. And you know what? I couldn't > taste any difference in the beer, there weren't any carbonation > problems, and the head retention was normal! > Since then I, and other members of our club, (Crown of the Valley > Brewers in Pasadena, CA) have routinely left the bubbles in sanitized > carboys and bottles with no problems and no worries. > Hope this helps, > John > > John Palmer > john at howtobrew.com > www.realbeer.com/jjpalmer > www.howtobrew.com - the free online book of homebrewing Gary Gary Smith http://musician.dyndns.org A mother takes twenty years to make a man of her boy, and another woman makes a fool of him in twenty minutes. - Robert Frost - Return to table of contents
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:13:51 -0700 (PDT) From: Kent Fletcher <fletcherhomebrew at yahoo.com> Subject: Re: Star San questions Gary was concerned about residual foam left by my favorite sanitizer. A few "NO"s are in order here. No, you can't get all of the "bubbles" out of the bottles, but if you look closely, you'll notice there is No liquid remaining after draining. No, Star San contains No soap. No, Star San will not hurt yeasties, carboys seemingly half filled with Star San foam pose No problems with fermentation. No, it will definitely not affect head retention. And lastly, No rinse, No infection, No worries! Kent Fletcher brewing in So Cal Return to table of contents
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:15:03 -0700 From: David Radwin <dradwin at sbcglobal.net> Subject: Re: Yeast Wrangling I have had repeated success culturing yeast from Chimay bottles (both large and small sizes) using the techniques described in Brewing the World's Great Beers by Dave Miller. Of course, you get a Chimay-tasting beer, more or less. I'm sure many others have had the same experience. I have read that Sierra Nevada Pale Ale has live yeast as well, as well as many Belgian beers, but I have no personal experience with them. > Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 10:36:42 -0400 > From: Matt Benzing <benzim at rpi.edu> > Subject: Yeast Wrangling > > I would like to try to wrangle yeast from a bottle conditioned beer. I have > heard that some bottle conditioned beers are filtered and then injected > with a dummy yeast, not the yeast that they were fermented with. Does > anyone know which products still contain the true yeast? I am looking at > Harvey's Elizabethan Ale, Harvey Imperial Extra Double Stout (aka A. le Coq > Imperial Stout), Bluebird Bitter, and Salopian Entire Butt...pretty much > all the bottle conditioned beers my local store carries. - -- David Radwin news at removethispart.davidradwin.com Return to table of contents
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 22:16:48 -0700 From: "Fred Waltman" <fwaltman at attbi.com> Subject: Fall European Beer Trip As we have for the last 4 years, a bunch of us are going over to Europe this fall to drink some beer. On the agenda is the Karakterbier Festival in Poperinge, Belgium, the 24 Hours of Belgian Beer in Antwerp and visits to Dusseldorf, Cologne and Bamberg (in time for the release of the bock beers!). If you are planning your own trip in late October-early November check out our schedule at www.StickeWarriors.com and maybe we can get together for a beer or six. Speaking of Bamberg and Franconia, I am also working on a new resource for beer travelers, www.FranconiaBeerGuide.com -- it is still very much a work in progress, but it may be useful to somebody planning a beer trip in the area. Fred Waltman Los Angeles, CA Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 06:58:25 -0400 From: "Mark Tumarkin" <mark_t at ix.netcom.com> Subject: re: Star San question Gary, You asked about the remaining Star San in the bottle affecting yeast performance and taste. I don't think you'll have any problem. I've only used Star San a few times but other brewers in my club use it regularly. I don't detect any flavor and the yeast & fermentations seem fine (same with idodophor). I am planning on switching once my iodophor runs out. Mainly because it doesn't stain plastic and seems to keep better long term - though you can 'refresh' your solution of either one. A suggestion for getting more of the bubbles out (would work for either sanitizer) - move your hands circularly as you hold the bottles upside down to drain. This gets the fluid inside moving around the bottles like water down a drain & seems to make them run out more cleanly & completely. Mark Tumarkin Hogtown Brewers Gainesville, FL Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:14:18 -0400 From: "Mark Tumarkin" <mark_t at ix.netcom.com> Subject: judging comments Brian, While talking about judges descriptions, you wrote: "Although stranger coincidences have happened, one would have to assume that the same judge wrote these two reviews. The weird part is the competitions for these two beers were a year apart. Interpret this as you like, what it says to me is this. There is (was) a judge out there who, rather than writing individualized reviews for individual beers, preferred to just call up macros as needed. That strikes me as lazy, or at least jaded, and probably not very effective judging. Judges, feel free to slap me down if you think I'm being too harsh on this kind of thing." I won't slap you down, though this particular example seems a bit extreme. I know that one thing I've been thinking about re my own judging is overuse of same vocabulary & phrases. I think it's way too easy to use the same wording repetitively. I have thought that it might be interesting to see 20 of my own score sheets for a particular style of beer. It might appear that I'd judged the exact same beer many times. I think this is less so for problem beers or really excellent beers, but for those in the middle I probably use the same words too frequently. I've started trying to look at the other judges score sheets (if time permits when we're done) to see what phrases, words, etc someone else used for the same flavors, faults etc while it's still fresh in my mind. It is way too easy to fall back on a limited set of phrases and words. I look at the beer reviews of folk like MJ, Protz, etc with awe. While their poetic descriptions may be out of place on a judging score sheet, they're way better than what I often turn out. If we want to be good judges, we have to keep thinking about things like this & trying to improve ourselves and the feedback we give to the brewers. Mark Tumarkin Hogtown Brewers Gainesville, FL Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 12:32:30 +0100 From: Tony Barnsley <tony.barnsley at blackpool.gov.uk> Subject: Corny Poppet Valves Hi all, Here in the UK we are quite lucky in that we have a couple of sources of Corny kegs that are not extortionate. (7.50 USD each uncleaned and untested) but our supplies of 'spares' are very limited. Poppet valves are our biggest problem. We know that there are at least 4 types, but our supplier can only get us one type which does not fit in all kegs. Now there's a surprise! Does anyone know of a wholesale supplier of poppet valves in the US that we can contact to bulk order a reasonable quantity? Perhaps one of the retailers reading this would be willing to negotiate prices for a bulk order of Corny bits? Thanks In Advance - -- Wassail! The Scurrilous Aleman (ICQ 46254361) Schwarzbad Lager Brauerei, Blackpool, Lancs, UK Email Disclaimer is: http://www.blackpool.gov.uk/democracy/corpdocs/EmailDisclaimer.htm This message has been scanned by F-Secure Anti-Virus for Microsoft Exchange as part of the Council's e-mail and internet policy. Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 07:34:06 -0400 From: "Barrett, Bob (R.A.)" <rbarrett at ford.com> Subject: Burner salvaging With all this salvage talk the past few days I have been wondering if anyone has ever made a homebrew set up from a discarded water heater burner or burners? How do the BTU's compare to the 175,000-200,000 BTU's of the Cajun Cooker? What else do you need to do to be able to use it? How does it attach to the framing of your brewing stand? Do you have any pictures? Is one particular brand better than another? Bob Barrett We Make the Beer We Drink!!! Ann Arbor, MI (2.8, 103.6) rennerian Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 09:26:57 -0400 From: "Steven Parfitt" <the_gimp98 at hotmail.com> Subject: RE: giddy Darell Posta: >Erik ( ShoesBrew3 at aol.com ) admits to getting giddy when a new brew is >on tap at the local brew-pub. I too frequently experience the "giddy >factor", which for me occurs when I realize that a batch that I bottled >a week or so ago is now ready to sample...YIPEEE! at # at ! >Beyond the obvious motivations for brewing (the taste of fresh ale, >the fun of 'cooking', the pleasure derived from making >your friends happy, etc..) I believe that there is something more >intrinsic to it. That is, the activity itself, the challenge of >managing >the myriad factors that go into a good brew,.......... >perhaps also the >direct and concrete feedback that one gets.... >Psychologists call this by various names, but one is 'effectance', ie >the >sense that one has had an effect...and some (White, for example) >believe >that this type of motivation is itself innate,...not socially > >inculcated.... I was thinking I was just a Brew-a-holic! I am in withdrawl right now. I have just moved, and can't get to my brew stuf to make a batch, and although I have plenty of beer on hand (I planned ahead for the rest of the year for LHBC Comps, etc), I want to brew. For me it is a hectic and tiring process when I brew, but I never brew quite the same. Often I do party gyle or split batches where I chill half the wort and start one batch, then continue the boil with spice additions, different hops, or just higher gravity to produce a second batch. My brew days often run 10 or 12 hrs from start to finish cleanup. There is something about trying different recipes, tweaking the process that is addictive to me.. rev Steven, -75 XLCH- Ironhead Nano-Brewery http://thegimp.8k.com Johnson City, TN [422.7, 169.2] Rennerian "Fools you are... who say you like to learn from your mistakes.... I prefer to learn from the mistakes of others and avoid the cost of my own." Otto von Bismarck Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 10:07:13 -0500 From: Brian Lundeen <BLundeen at rrc.mb.ca> Subject: Pat, pat, pat No, I'm not trying to get our janitor's attention, just reassuring Gary Smith, who wrote: > > I am using my first run with Star San. I just soaked the bottles > for about 5 min & then hung them upside down to dry but > there's sooo many bubbles left behind. I called the people I > bought it from and they said not to worry, that's the way is is > but it will be no problem whatsoever. > > It must be OK because so many people like it. > > Reassurances would be appreciated. Star San residue is not yeast inhibiting the way Iodophor or chlorine are. It also imparts no flavour. Take a sip of the stuff (in properly diluted form of course) if you don't believe me. I was over at randomly appearing poster Ralph Link's place (which is out in the country) and demonstrated this to him. I did remark to him that his well water tasted like excrement (changed because Pat,pat,pat's filters even go after the Scottish version of the usual term), but other than that, it is really quite innocuous. Now I suppose some day some "black hole of fun" (or scientist, as they are commonly known) will show that dodecylbenzenesulfonic acid causes your liver, kidneys and frontal lobes to melt into virtually indistinguishable blobs. Until that time, I will highly recommend Star San to anyone who'll listen as an easy to use, reusable, effective and not horrendously expensive sanitizer. And if you find a place that sells the stuff by the gallon, like I did, you're way ahead on the last point, too. Cheers Brian Lundeen Killin' da bugs at [314,829] aka Winnipeg Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 11:52:33 -0400 From: Bill Wible <bill at brewbyyou.net> Subject: Re: Brian's judging story Brian Lundeen writes about poor judge comments, and what he perceived to be laziness by a judge who apparently used canned comments. Brian, there is so much going on here. It sounds like these might not even have been judge's comments at all, but could have been something an editor made up. Or it might have been a 'cut and paste' problem where they inadvertently used the same comments twice. Even if they were real judge's comments, it's been my experience that the people who are BJCP judges come from a variety of backgrounds and jobs. We're not all master degree college educated people. Yes, there are alot of programmers and engineers walking around with the BJCP style guidelines in their PDA's at these competitions, but you'll also find guys (and girls) from all sorts of other backgrounds as well. Just like the mixes that make most homebrew clubs, you'll find blue collar people along with the white collar people. There are plumbers, carpenters, and painters along with the engineers, doctors, programmers, and corporate executives. There are even some older guys who are retirees. The plumbers and carpenters are usually not required to write anything as part of their job. Any skill that isn't used regularly does deteriorate. Some of the people have no college, most were never english majors, and for some, English is not even their native language. Remember we had a professional brewer on hbd here from Germany whose native language was German. Not that long ago, he was attacked rather brutally over faulty English in one of his posts. Sadly, we lost that guy and his expertise for good over that insensitivity. Just bear in mind that not all judges are equal. Yes, like everything else, there are good and bad. But just because someone's grammar or English isn't excellent, it doesn't mean they're stupid or they can't judge beer. And canned comments like the one you quoted are still far better than some of the ones I've gotten. I've had sections on scoresheets that were returned to me that had 3 letters in the whole section. Something like 'DMS'. That was the whole comment section. Sometimes, I can even understand something like that, especially from a larger competition with alot of entries. Competitions are held in donated or very cheaply rented spaces, usually at an area bar or restaurant. The competition has a set amount of time to finish, then these places want their space back. So sometimes judges are rushed, and they have to go a little quicker than they might like. Complaining about judge comments is nothing new. If you search HBD and judgenet, you'll find this has been going on forever. Let's admit it, how many of us really enter a competition 'just to get feedback'? Nah, some people might say that, but I don't believe it. We're all trying for ribbons. It seems the guys who get a 38 and a first place award every time out usually don't care as much about what the judges actually wrote, now do they? And you'll notice its the same guys every time. You don't hear from them about quality of comments. Its usually guys who got low scores or who didn't get a ribbon that are doing all the complaining 'about the judges'. Bill Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 20:16:59 -0400 From: "David Craft" <chsyhkr at bellsouth.net> Subject: List Member Is Phil Sides on this List? I have a question for you about a recent judging. Please respond to me directly. Sorry for the interruption, We now return you to your programming already in progress. David B. Craft Battleground Brewers Homebrew Club Crow Hill Brewery and Meadery Greensboro, NC Return to table of contents
Date: Thu, 15 Aug 2002 23:32:48 -0300 From: "The Madcap" <atomheartbarrett at datafull.com> Subject: Fw: Star San proposal "Gary Smith" wrote this about the Star San > I am using my first run with Star San. I just soaked the bottles > for about 5 min & then hung them upside down to dry but > there's sooo many bubbles left behind. I called the people I > bought it from and they said not to worry, that's the way is is > but it will be no problem whatsoever. > > Seems like the bubbles would indicate some kind of surfactant > (soap) & that would reduce head retention. I wonder about it's > effects on the yeast when I bottle (if it's a sanitizer won't it > make it hard for the yeast if there's bubble residue left behind > after hanging to dry)? Gary, if I were you I'd probably do this, split the batch in two before I bottle it and use some bottles sanitized with Star San and some bottles sanitized with alcohol. I don't know how Star San works, I've never even heard of it, down here in Argentina but by doing this you'd compare how does it affect the head of your beer or the work of the yeast if it does it. If you don't trust Star San you could use only a few bottles sanitized with it. The Madcap Laughs At The Man In The Border Return to table of contents
HTML-ized on 08/16/02, by HBD2HTML v1.2 by KFL webmaster at hbd.org, KFL, 10/9/96 |